LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,542
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,347
Ranjbar Omidi, Baharan, Heidari, Soolmaz, Farahbakhshpour, Fatemeh, Tavakolian Ardakani, Elham, Mirzadeh, Monirsadat. (1401). The Effect of Dental Adhesive Composition and Etching Mode on Microleakage of Bonding Agents in Primary Molar Teeth. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23(Supplement-September-2022), 393-401. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.90489.1497
Baharan Ranjbar Omidi; Soolmaz Heidari; Fatemeh Farahbakhshpour; Elham Tavakolian Ardakani; Monirsadat Mirzadeh. "The Effect of Dental Adhesive Composition and Etching Mode on Microleakage of Bonding Agents in Primary Molar Teeth". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23, Supplement-September-2022, 1401, 393-401. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.90489.1497
Ranjbar Omidi, Baharan, Heidari, Soolmaz, Farahbakhshpour, Fatemeh, Tavakolian Ardakani, Elham, Mirzadeh, Monirsadat. (1401). 'The Effect of Dental Adhesive Composition and Etching Mode on Microleakage of Bonding Agents in Primary Molar Teeth', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23(Supplement-September-2022), pp. 393-401. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.90489.1497
Ranjbar Omidi, Baharan, Heidari, Soolmaz, Farahbakhshpour, Fatemeh, Tavakolian Ardakani, Elham, Mirzadeh, Monirsadat. The Effect of Dental Adhesive Composition and Etching Mode on Microleakage of Bonding Agents in Primary Molar Teeth. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 23(Supplement-September-2022): 393-401. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.90489.1497

The Effect of Dental Adhesive Composition and Etching Mode on Microleakage of Bonding Agents in Primary Molar Teeth

Journal of Dentistry
مقاله 8، دوره 23، Supplement-September-2022، آذر 2022، صفحه 393-401    اصل مقاله (715.33 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2021.90489.1497
نویسندگان
Baharan Ranjbar Omidi1؛ Soolmaz Heidari1؛ Fatemeh Farahbakhshpour2؛ Elham Tavakolian Ardakani* 2؛ Monirsadat Mirzadeh3
1Dept. of Operative Dentistry, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
2Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
3Dept. of Community Medicine, Metabolic Disease Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
چکیده
Statement of the Problem: The dilemma of microleakage at the composite-tooth interface is still a major challenge in operative dental practice.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the microleakage of universal adhesive with self-etch and total-etch bonding strategies for restoration of class-II primary molar cavities.
Materials and Method: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 75 extracted primary molars. Class-II cavities were prepared in mesial or distal surfaces. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups of Adper Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE; St Paul, MN, USA), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Noritake, Osaka, Japan), G-Bond (GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan), G-Premio Bond (GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) with total-etch mode and G-Premio Bond with self-etch mode. Cavities were also restored with Nano-hybrid resin composite (Grandio, VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany) and incubated for 24 hours, followed by thermocycling at 1500× between 5-55°C within a dwell time of 20 seconds. Later, the cavities were placed in 1M silver nitrate solution and evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Finally, microleakage was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively. One tooth in each group was prepared and evaluated under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test and Chi-square test (p< 0.05).
Results: The microleakage values were significantly different in the study groups (p< 0.05). The highest level of microleakage was noted in G-Bond and the lowest in G-Premio Bond with total etching. There was a significant correlation between the qualitative and quantitative measurements of microleakage.
Conclusion: The G-Premio Bond yielded acceptable results in terms of microleakage in total-etch and self-etch modes. However, additional etching is recommended to improve the quality of bonding.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Dental leakage؛ Dental etching؛ Tooth؛ Deciduous؛ Molar
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  • Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Wegley C. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent. 2007; 32: 179-184.
  • Fruits TJ, Knapp JA, Khajotia SS. Microleakage in the proximal walls of direct and indirect posterior resin slot restorations. Oper Dent. 2006; 31: 719-727.
  • Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017; 8: 1-17.
  • Samimi P, Barekatain M, Alaei S. Comparison of microleakage of composite restorations using fifth and sixth generation dentin bonding agent: an in vivoJ Contemp Dent Pract. 2012; 13: 632-636.
  • Wong J, Tsujimoto A, Fischer NG, Baruth AG, Barkmeier WW, Johnson EA, et al. Enamel Etching for Universal Adhesives: Examination of Enamel Etching Protocols for Optimization of Bonding Effectiveness. Oper Dent. 2020; 45: 80-91.
  • Suzuki S, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Imai A, Tsujimoto A, Sai K, et al. Bond durability of universal adhesive to bovine enamel using self-etch mode. Clin Oral 2018; 22: 1113-1122.
  • Sadek FT, Moura SK, Ballester RY, Muench A, Cardoso PEC. The effect of long-term storage on microleakage of composite resin restorations–qualitive and quantitative evaluation. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003; 17: 261-266.
  • Bore*Gowda V, Sreenivasa* Murthy BV, Hegde S, Venkataramanaswamy SD, Pai VS, Krishna R. Evaluation of gingival microleakage in class II composite restorations with different lining techniques: an in vitro Scientifica (Cairo). 2015; 2015: 896507.
  • El-Damanhoury HM, Gaintantzopoulou M. Effect of thermocycling, degree of conversion and cavity configuration on the bonding effectiveness of all-in-one adhesives. Oper Dent. 2015; 40: 480-491.
  • Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D'Arcangelo C, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014; 29: 295-308.
  • Alvarenga FAS, Pinelli C, Loffredo LCM. Reliability of marginal microleakage assessment by visual and digital methods. Eur J Dent. 2015; 9: 1-5.
  • Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Kimmes NS. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre-etched enamel. Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 1187-1194.
  • Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001; 17: 430-444.
  • Lopes GC, Marson FC, Vieira LC, de Caldeira AM, Baratieri LN. Composite bond strength to enamel with self-etching primers. Oper Dent. 2004; 29: 424-429.
  • Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015; 43: 765-776.
  • Yoshida Y, Van*Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res. 2000; 79:709-714.
  • Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004; 83: 454-458.
  • GC America Inc. available at: https://www.gcamerica. com/products
  • Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, et al. Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent. 2014; 39: 489-99.
  • Tian F, Zhou L, Zhang Z, NiuL, Zhang L, Chen C, et al. Paucity of Nanolayering in Resin-Dentin Interfaces of MDP-based Adhesives. J Dent Res. 2016; 95: 380-387.
  • Iwai H, Fujita K, Iwai H, Ikemi T, Goto H, Aida M, et al. Development of MDP-based one-step self-etch adhesive--effect of additional 4-META on bonding performance. Dent Mater J. 2013; 32: 1-9.
  • Navarra CO, Cadenaro M, Frassetto A, Fontanive L, Di*Lenarda R, Breschi L. Degree of Conversion of Self-etch Adhesives: In Situ Micro-Raman Analysis. Oper Dent. 2016; 41: 501-510.
  • Perdigão J, Lopes MM, Gomes G. In vitro bonding performance of self-etch adhesives: II--ultramorphological evaluation. Oper Dent. 2008; 33: 534-49.
  • Gupta A, Tavane P, Gupta PK, Tejolatha B, Lakhani AA, Tiwari R, et al. Evaluation of microleakage with total etch, self etch and universal adhesive systems in class V restorations: an in vitroJ Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11: ZC53-ZC56.
  • Chandra PV, Harikumar V, Ramkiran D, Krishna MJ, Gouda MV. Microleakage of class V resin composites using various self-etching adhesives: an in vitroJ Contemp Dent Pract. 2013; 14: 51-55.
  • Duddu MK, Muppa R, Panthula P, Srinivas NCh. Comparison of shear bond strength and microleakage of three commercially available seventh generation bonding agents in primary anterior teeth: an in vitroJ Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015; 33: 116-121.
  • Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Irie M, Ogawa T, et al. Nanolayering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin. Acta Biomater. 2011; 7: 3187-3195.
  • Sezinando A, Serrano ML, Pérez VM, Muñoz RA, Ceballos L, Perdigão J. Chemical Adhesion of Polyalkenoate-based Adhesives to Hydroxyapatite. J Adhes Dent. 2016; 18: 257-265.
  • Knirsch MS, Bonifácio CC, Shimaoka AM, Andrade AP, Carvalho RC. Bonding effectiveness of different adhesion approaches to unground versus ground primary tooth enamel. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2009; 10: 83-89.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,476
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,167


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب