LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,483
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,259
Heydari, Zhaleh, Aminian, Gholamreza, Biglarian, Akbar, Shokrpour, Maryam, Mardani, Mohammad Ali. (1401). Comparison of the Modified Lumbar Pelvic Belt with the Current Belt on Low Back and Pelvic Pain in Pregnant Women. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(3), 309-318. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2111-1427
Zhaleh Heydari; Gholamreza Aminian; Akbar Biglarian; Maryam Shokrpour; Mohammad Ali Mardani. "Comparison of the Modified Lumbar Pelvic Belt with the Current Belt on Low Back and Pelvic Pain in Pregnant Women". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12, 3, 1401, 309-318. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2111-1427
Heydari, Zhaleh, Aminian, Gholamreza, Biglarian, Akbar, Shokrpour, Maryam, Mardani, Mohammad Ali. (1401). 'Comparison of the Modified Lumbar Pelvic Belt with the Current Belt on Low Back and Pelvic Pain in Pregnant Women', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(3), pp. 309-318. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2111-1427
Heydari, Zhaleh, Aminian, Gholamreza, Biglarian, Akbar, Shokrpour, Maryam, Mardani, Mohammad Ali. Comparison of the Modified Lumbar Pelvic Belt with the Current Belt on Low Back and Pelvic Pain in Pregnant Women. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 12(3): 309-318. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2111-1427

Comparison of the Modified Lumbar Pelvic Belt with the Current Belt on Low Back and Pelvic Pain in Pregnant Women

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 10، دوره 12، شماره 3، شهریور 2022، صفحه 309-318    اصل مقاله (769.17 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2111-1427
نویسندگان
Zhaleh Heydari1؛ Gholamreza Aminian2؛ Akbar Biglarian3؛ Maryam Shokrpour4؛ Mohammad Ali Mardani* 2، 5
1PhD Candidate, Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2PhD, Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3PhD, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Social Determinants of Health Research center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4MD, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
5PhD, Red Crescent Society of Yazd Province, Yazd, Iran
چکیده
Background: Low back pain is one of the most common problems for pregnant women during pregnancy. Most belts are designed for supporting the surface of the symphysis pubis or upper anterior iliac spine without any support in the lumbar region.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the related effects between the new design and the current belt on the pain and function of pregnant women.
Material and Methods: In this randomized control trial study, 48 pregnant women with pelvic and lumbar pain participated. The participants were randomly divided into three groups: current belt, modified belt, and control. Pain intensity assessment, pelvic girdle (PG), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaires were utilized at the beginning of the study and three weeks later.
Results: The pain intensity decreased more in the modified belt group than in the current belt group. ODI and PG scores decreased in two belt groups after three weeks of follow-up. However, this decrease was greater in the modified belt group, there was no statistically significant difference.
Conclusion: The disability decreased in both groups using the belts, and their function was improved. Accordingly, the use of a modified belt with lumbar and PG support can significantly reduce back and pelvic pain in pregnant women compared to the current pelvic belt.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Pregnancy؛ Low Back Pain؛ Pelvic Pain؛ Orthosis؛ Function
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Ayanniyi O, Sanya AO, Ogunlade SO, Oni-Orisan MO. Prevalence and pattern of back pain among pregnant women attending ante-natal clinics in selected health care facilities. African Journal of Biomedical Research. 2006;9(3):149-56. doi: 10.4314/ajbr.v9i3.48898.
  2. Ramachandra P, Maiya AG, Kumar P, Kamath A. Prevalence of musculoskeletal dysfunctions among Indian pregnant women. J Pregnancy. 2015;2015:437105. doi: 10.1155/2015/437105. PubMed PMID: 25642349. PubMed PMCID: PMC4302374.
  3. Sehmbi H, D’Souza R, Bhatia A. Low Back Pain in Pregnancy: Investigations, Management, and Role of Neuraxial Analgesia and Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2017;82(5):417-36. doi: 10.1159/000471764. PubMed PMID: 28514779.
  4. Borg-Stein J, Dugan SA, Gruber J. Musculoskeletal aspects of pregnancy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(3):180-92. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000156970.96219.48. PubMed PMID: 15725792.
  5. Richardson CA, Snijders CJ, Hides JA, Damen L, Pas MS, Storm J. The relation between the transversus abdominis muscles, sacroiliac joint mechanics, and low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(4):399-405. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200202150-00015. PubMed PMID: 11840107.
  6. Barry-Greb TL, Harrison AL. Posture, gait, and functional abilities of the adolescent, pregnant, and elderly female. Orthop Phys Ther Clin North Am. 1996;5:1-22.
  7. Kluge J, Hall D, Louw Q, Theron G, Grové D. Specific exercises to treat pregnancy-related low back pain in a South African population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113(3):187-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.030. PubMed PMID: 21458811.
  8. Jessica Rose JGG. Human Walking 3rd Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 234.
  9. Soltani H, Fraser RB. A longitudinal study of maternal anthropometric changes in normal weight, overweight and obese women during pregnancy and postpartum. Br J Nutr. 2000;84(1):95-101. doi: 10.1017/s0007114500001276. PubMed PMID: 10961165.
  10. Kang XL, Ying BA, Zhang X, Qi J, Wu L. Force Analysis of the Support Belt and Pregnant Woman for Relieving the Pregnancy-related Waist Pain. Journal of Fiber Bioengineering and Informatics. 2018;11(4):217-26. doi: 10.3993/jfbim00302.
  11. Ritchie JR. Orthopedic considerations during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;46(2):456-66. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200306000-00024. PubMed PMID: 12808395.
  12. Biviá-Roig G, Lisón JF, Sánchez-Zuriaga D. Effects of pregnancy on lumbar motion patterns and muscle responses. Spine J. 2019;19(2):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.009. PubMed PMID: 30144534.
  13. Cheng PL, Pantel M, Smith JT, Dumas GA, Leger AB, Plamondon A, McGrath MJ, Tranmer JE. Back pain of working pregnant women: identification of associated occupational factors. Appl Ergon. 2009;40(3):419-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.11.002. PubMed PMID: 19084818.
  14. Gutke A, Boissonnault J, Brook G, Stuge B. The Severity and Impact of Pelvic Girdle Pain and Low-Back Pain in Pregnancy: A Multinational Study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018;27(4):510-7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6342. PubMed PMID: 28832267.
  15. Cameron L, Marsden J, Watkins K, Freeman J. Management of antenatal pelvic-girdle pain study (MAPS): A single centred blinded randomised trial evaluating the effectiveness of two pelvic orthoses. Int J Women’s Heal Care. 2018;3(2):1-9.
  16. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(6):794-819. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0602-4. PubMed PMID: 18259783. PubMed PMCID: PMC2518998.
  17. Mens JM, Pool-Goudzwaard A, Stam HJ. Mobility of the pelvic joints in pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009;64(3):200-8. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181950f1b. PubMed PMID: 19228440.
  18. Liddle SD, Pennick V. Interventions for preventing and treating low-back and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(9):CD001139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001139.pub4. PubMed PMID: 26422811. PubMed PMCID: PMC7053516.
  19. Glinkowski WM, Tomasik P, Walesiak K, Głuszak M, et al. Posture and low back pain during pregnancy - 3D study. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(8):575-80. doi: 10.5603/GP.2016.0047. PubMed PMID: 27629132.
  20. Bishop A, Holden MA, Ogollah RO, Foster NE, EASE Back Study Team. Current management of pregnancy-related low back pain: a national cross-sectional survey of U.K. physiotherapists. Physiotherapy. 2016;102(1):78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.02.003. PubMed PMID: 26050136.
  21. Wang SM, Dezinno P, Maranets I, Berman MR, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Kain ZN. Low back pain during pregnancy: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):65-70. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000129403.54061.0e. PubMed PMID: 15229002.
  22. Osterbauer PJ, De Boer KF, Widmaier R, Petermann E, Fuhr AW. Treatment and biomechanical assessment of patients with chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993;16(2):82-90. PubMed PMID: 8445358.
  23. Vleeming A, Buyruk HM, Stoeckart R, Karamursel S, Snijders CJ. An integrated therapy for peripartum pelvic instability: a study of the biomechanical effects of pelvic belts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(4):1243-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90615-2. PubMed PMID: 1566778.
  24. Damen L, Spoor CW, Snijders CJ, Stam HJ. Does a pelvic belt influence sacroiliac joint laxity? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17(7):495-8. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(02)00045-1. PubMed PMID: 12206939.
  25. Luukkainen RK, Wennerstrand PV, Kautiainen HH, Sanila MT, Asikainen EL. Efficacy of periarticular corticosteroid treatment of the sacroiliac joint in non-spondylarthropathic patients with chronic low back pain in the region of the sacroiliac joint. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002;20(1):52-4. PubMed PMID: 11892709.
  26. Yin W, Willard F, Carreiro J, Dreyfuss P. Sensory stimulation-guided sacroiliac joint radiofrequency neurotomy: technique based on neuroanatomy of the dorsal sacral plexus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(20):2419-25. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000085360.03758.C3. PubMed PMID: 14560094.
  27. Pennick V, Liddle SD. Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(8):CD001139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001139. PubMed PMID: 23904227.
  28. Oh JS. Effects of Pelvic Belt on Hip Extensor Muscle EMG Activity during Prone Hip Extension in Females with Chronic Low Back Pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(7):1023-4. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1023. PubMed PMID: 25140087. PubMed PMCID: PMC4135188.
  29. Bertuit J, Van Lint CE, Rooze M, Feipel V. Pregnancy and pelvic girdle pain: Analysis of pelvic belt on pain. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(1-2):e129-37. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13888. PubMed PMID: 28544276.
  30. Carr CA. Use of a maternity support binder for relief of pregnancy-related back pain. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003;32(4):495-502. doi: 10.1177/0884217503255196. PubMed PMID: 12903699.
  31. Arumugam A, Milosavljevic S, Woodley S, Sole G. Effects of external pelvic compression on form closure, force closure, and neuromotor control of the lumbopelvic spine--a systematic review. Man Ther. 2012;17(4):275-84. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.01.010. PubMed PMID: 22386280.
  32. Flack NA, Hay-Smith EJ, Stringer MD, Gray AR, Woodley SJ. Adherence, tolerance and effectiveness of two different pelvic support belts as a treatment for pregnancy-related symphyseal pain - a pilot randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:36. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0468-5. PubMed PMID: 25885585. PubMed PMCID: PMC4339641.
  33. Kordi R, Abolhasani M, Rostami M, Hantoushzadeh S, Mansournia MA, Vasheghani-Farahani F. Comparison between the effect of lumbopelvic belt and home based pelvic stabilizing exercise on pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain; a randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(2):133-9. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-00357. PubMed PMID: 23640314.
  34. Mens JM, Damen L, Snijders CJ, Stam HJ. The mechanical effect of a pelvic belt in patients with pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.016. PubMed PMID: 16214275.
  35. Szkwara JM, Milne N, Hing W, Pope R. Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses (DEFO) for Managing Pain, Functional Capacity, and Quality of Life during Prenatal and Postnatal Care: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(13):2408. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132408. PubMed PMID: 31284612. PubMed PMCID: PMC6651323.
  36. Quintero Rodriguez C, Troynikov O. The Effect of Maternity Support Garments on Alleviation of Pains and Discomforts during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. J Pregnancy. 2019;2019:2163790. doi: 10.1155/2019/2163790. PubMed PMID: 31467715. PubMed PMCID: PMC6699320.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,835
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 556


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب