تعداد نشریات | 20 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,149 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,415,485 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,291,272 |
Comparing Castability of Nickel-Chromium, Cobalt-Chromium, and Non-Precious Gold Color Alloys, Using two Different Casting Techniques | ||
Journal of Dentistry | ||
مقاله 2، دوره 23، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 74، خرداد 2022، صفحه 7-12 اصل مقاله (357.94 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2021.87573.1275 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Elham Ansarifard1؛ Mitra Farzin2؛ Arghavan Zohour Parlack3؛ Masumeh Taghva* 1؛ Razieh Zare4 | ||
1Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
2Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
3General Dentist, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
4Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
چکیده | ||
Statement of the Problem: The castability of nonprecious gold color alloy using torch/ centrifugal and induction/vacuum-pressure casting techniques has not been studied yet. Purpose: This study was conducted to compare the castability of nickel chromium, cobalt-chromium and nonprecious gold color alloy using torch/centrifugal and induction/ vacuum-pressure casting techniques. Materials and Method: In this in vitro study, a total number of 54 identical acrylic wax meshes were prepared and divided into 6 different groups of 9 each. Group 1: nickel-chromium alloy, which was casted with induction technique. Group 2: nickel-chromium alloy was casted with centrifugal technique. Group 3: cobalt-chromium alloy was casted with induction technique. Group 4: cobalt-chromium alloy was casted with centrifugal technique. Group 5: nonprecious gold color alloy was casted with induction technique. Group 6: nonprecious gold color alloy was casted with centrifugal technique. Then castability of specimens was measured using modified Whitlock’s method. The results were analyzed using two way ANOVA and post hoc tests. Results: ANOVA test revealed no statistically significant difference between different alloys with a p Value of 0.313. Moreover, it represented no significant differences within the groups regarding alloy types and casting techniques with a p Value of 0.511 and 0.682, respectively. Conclusion: No significant difference was found in the castability value of nickel-chromium, cobalt-chromium, and nonprecious gold color alloys. In addition, the castability value of three alloys tested in this study was not different by using torch/centrifugal or induction/vacuum-pressure casting machines. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Castability؛ Chromium Alloys؛ Non-Precious Gold Color (NPG)؛ Dental Casting Technique؛ Centrifugation | ||
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
مراجع | ||
[1] Roach M. Base metal alloys used for dental restorations and implants. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51: 603-627.
[2] Bahri D, Sadrnezhaad SK, Koosha S, Najmoddin N. Shear Bond Strength of Porcelain Veneering to Nickel-Chromium, Chromium-Cobalt, Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate. J Islamic Dent Assoc Iran. 2020; 32: 12-20.
[3] Lee JJ, Song KY, Ahn SG, Choi JY, Seo JM, Park JM. Evaluation of effect of galvanic corrosion between nickel-chromium metal and titanium on ion release and cell toxicity J Adv Prosthodont. 2015; 7: 172-177.
[4] Kim HR, Kim YK, Son JS, Min BK, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Comparison of in vitro biocompatibility of a Co–Cr dental alloy produced by new milling/post-sintering or traditional casting technique. Materials Letters. 2016; 178: 300-303.
[5] Ramírez-Ledesma AL, Roncagliolo P, Álvarez-Pérez MA, Lopez HF, Juárez-Islas JA. Corrosion Assessment of an Implantable Dental Co-Cr Alloy in Artificial Saliva and Biocompatibility Behavior. J Mat Engin Perform. 2020; 5: 1-4.
[6] Eliasson A, Arnelund CF, Johansson A. A clinical evaluation of cobalt-chromium metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures and crowns: A three- to seven-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98: 6-16.
[7] Barghi N, McKeehan-Whitmer M, Aranda R. Comparison of fracture strength of porcelain-veneered-to-high noble and base metal alloys. J Prosthet Dent.1987; 57: 23-32.
[8] Al*Jabbari YS. Physico-mechanical properties and prosthodontic applications of Co-Cr dental alloys: a review of the literature. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6: 138-145.
[9] Albadent. Available at: https://aalbadent.com/products/c-rown-bridge-alloys-fmc/npg
[10] Khaledi AAR, Sheykhian S, Khodaei A. Evaluation of retention of two different cast post-core systems and fracture resistance of the restored teeth. J Dent. 2015; 16: 121.
[11] Gholami F, Kohani P, Aalaei S. Effect of nickel-chromium and non-precious gold color alloy cast posts on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Iran Endod J. 2017; 12: 303-306.
[12] Presswood RG. The castability of alloys for small casting. J Prosth Dent. 1983; 50: 36-39.
[13] Guttal SS, Patil NP. Effect of sprue design on the castability and internal porosity in pure titanium castings. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38: e78-e82.
[14] Gomathi G. A comparative analysis of the influence of new and recast alloy combinations on castability, chemical analysis, microstructural properties of Ni-Cr Alloy. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2018; 7: 43-49.
[15] Watanabe I, Woldu M, Watanabe K, Okabe T. Effect of casting method on castability of titanium and dental alloys. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000; 11: 547-553.
[16] Satoh Y, Toyoma H, Ohki K, Kimura K, Shina Y, Mawda K. Studies on the castability of Co-Cr alloy for cast plates. Part 1: The effects of sprue attachment, direction to the wax plates and investment direction of refractory models. J Niton Univ Sch Dent. 1989; 31: 397-407.
[17] Satoh Y, Miyata M, Ono F, Ujiie X, Toyoma H, Ohki K, et al. Studies on the castability of Co-Cr alloy for cast plates. Part 2: effect of form of sprue attachment to the wax pattern. J Niton Univ Sch Dent. 1990; 32: 27-34.
[18] Shanley JJ, Ancowitz SJ, Fenster RK, Pelleu GB*Jr. A comparative study of the centrifugal and vacuum-pressure techniques of casting removable partial denture frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45: 18-23.
[19] Hinman RW, Tesk JA, Whitlock RP, Parry EE, Durkowski JS. A technique for characterizing casting behavior of dental alloys. J Dent Res.1985; 64: 134-138.
[20] Vaillant-Corroy AS, Corne P, De March P, Fleutot S, Cleymand F. Influence of recasting on the quality of dental alloys: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 205-211.
[21] Palaskar J, Nadgir DV, Shah I. Effect of recasting of nickel: chromium alloy on its castability. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010; 10: 160-164.
[22] Palaskar J, Nadgir DV, Shah I. Effect of recasting of nickel: chromium alloy on its castability. J Indian Prosth Soc. 2010; 10: 160-164.
[23] Sharma A, Rodrigues SJ, Shetty TB, Shenoy VK, Mundathaje M, Saldanha S. Evaluation of effect of recasting of nickel-chromium alloy on its castability using different investment materials: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2016; 27: 190.
[24] Imran M, Raza M, Sartaj Khan M, Hayat Y. Effect of Cobalt-Chromium Alloy Re-Use in Dentistry on its Castability Value. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017; 29: 270-274.
[25] Carreiro Ada F, Ribeiro RF, Mattos Mda G, Rodrigues RC. Evaluation of the castability of a Co-Cr-Mo-W alloy varying the investing technique. Braz Dent J. 2005; 16: 50-55.
[26] Thompson GA, Luo Q, Hefti A. Analysis of four dental alloys following torch/centrifugal and induction/vacuum-pressure casting procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110: 471-480.
[27] Martignoni M, Schönenberger A. Precision Fixed Prosthodontics: Clinical and Laboratory Aspects. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co.; 1990. p. 231-233. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,921 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,877 |