پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,089 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,995 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 26,494,845 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,295,077 |
The Effect of Different Foundation Materials on the Color of Monolithic Zirconia at Different Thicknesses | ||
| Journal of Dentistry | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 22، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 73، اسفند 2021، صفحه 252-259 اصل مقاله (467.04 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2021.85516.1131 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Elham Ansarifard1؛ Mina Mohghegh* 1؛ Maryam Pakniyat2؛ Rashin Giti1 | ||
| 1Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| 2Student, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Statement of the Problem: Monolithic zirconia restoration has been introduced to overcome the porcelain chipping. Different factors can affect the color of monolithic zirconia, so achieving the desired color in the restorations is considered as a challenge. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of different foundation materials on the color of monolithic zirconia at different thicknesses. Materials and Method: In this experimental study, thirty ceramic disks in three thicknesses (i.e. 0.6mm, 1.1mm and 1.5mm) were fabricated from high translucency shade A2 monolithic zirconia block. Disk shaped foundation materials were fabricated from nickel chromium alloy (Ni-Cr), non-precious gold alloy (NPG), zirconia, and shade A2 composite resin. The color was measured by a spectrophotometer. The color differences (∆E) in the control and the test groups were calculated. The data were analyzed using two way ANOVA and compared with the posthoc Tukey test (a=0.05). Results: ceramic thickness and foundation materials had a significant effect on the mean values of ∆E of monolithic zirconia ceramics (p = 0.001). The highest amount of ∆E value was observed in NPG, while Ni-Cr resulted in the lowest ∆E. Unacceptable results (∆E>2.25) were observed for monolithic zirconia ceramics on NPG foundation material with a thicknesses of 0.6 and 1.1mm. The mean L* values of all foundation materials were higher than those of the control group except for Ni-Cr. The highest a* was seen in NPG and the mean b* values of all tested foundation materials were higher than those of the control group except for Ni-Cr. Conclusion: Increasing the thickness of monolithic zirconia decreased the color mismatch. High translucent monolithic zirconia could mask the color of Ni-Cr and zirconia in all three thicknesses (∆E˂2.25), while it could not mask the color of NPG under thickness of 1.5mm. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Color؛ Thickness؛ Foundation؛ Ceramics؛ Zirconium؛ Gold Alloys | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Li Q, Yu H, Wang Y. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of core build-up composites on all-ceramic materials. Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 158-165.
[2] Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC, LeBeau D, Nunokawa G. Effect of abutment tooth color, cement color, and ceramic thickness on the resulting optical color of a CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced crown. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105:83-90.
[3] Dede DÖ, Armağanci A, Ceylan G, Celik E, Cankaya S, Yilmaz B. Influence of implant abutment material on the color of different ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 764-769.
[4] Jirajariyavej B, Wanapirom P, Anunmana C. Influence of implant abutment material and ceramic thickness on optical properties. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 819-825.
[5] Niu E, Agustin M, Douglas RD. Color match of machinable lithium disilicate ceramics: Effects of foundation restoration. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110: 501-509.
[6] Azer SS, Ayash GM, Johnston WM, Khalil MF, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of esthetic core shades on the final color of IPS Empress all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96: 397-401.
[7] Raptis NV, Michalakis KX, Hirayama H. Optical behavior of current ceramic systems. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26: 31-41.
[8] Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determin-ation of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97: 200-208.
[9] Ishikawa-Nagai S, Yoshida A, Sakai M, Kristiansen J, Da*Silva JD. Clinical evaluation of perceptibility of color differences between natural teeth and all-ceramic crowns. J Dent. 2009; 37: e57-e63.
[10] Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater. 2011; 27: 97-108.
[11] Nakamura T, Saito O, Fuyikawa J, Ishigaki S. Influence of abutment substrate and ceramic thickness on the colour of heat‐pressed ceramic crowns. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29: 805-809.
[12] Carames J, Tovar Suinaga L, Yu YCP, Pérez A, Kang M. Clinical advantages and limitations of monolithic zirconia restorations full arch implant supported reconstruction: case series. Int J Dent. 2015; 2015.
[13] Ilie N, Stawarczyk B. Quantification of the amount of light passing through zirconia: the effect of material shade, thickness, and curing conditions. J Dent. 2014; 42: 684-690.
[14] Suputtamongkol K, Tulapornchai C, Mamani J, Kamchatphai W, Thongpun N. Effect of the shades of background substructures on the overall color of zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns. J Adv prosthodont. 2013; 5: 319-325.
[15] Ozturk O, Uludag B, Usumez A, Sahin V, Celik G. The effect of ceramic thickness and number of firings on the color of two all-ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100: 99-106.
[16] Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Vallittu PK, Närhi TO, Lassila LV. The effect of staining and vacuum sintering on optical and mechanical properties of partially and fully stabilized monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34: 605-610.
[17] Pires LA, Novais PMR, Araújo VD, Pegoraro LF. Effects of the type and thickness of ceramic, substrate and cement on the optical color of a lithium disilicate ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 144-149.
[18] de*Azevedo Cubas GB, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Pereira-Cenci T. The effect of luting agents and ceramic thickness on the color variation of different ceramics against a chromatic background. Eur J Dent. 2011; 5: 245.
[19] Alqahtani MQ, Aljurais RM, Alshaafi MM. The effects of different shades of resin luting cement on the color of ceramic veneers. Dent Mater J. 2012; 31: 354-361.
[20] Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, Essig ME, Janowski GM. Evaluation of the optical properties of CAD-CAM generated yttria-stabilized zirconia and glass-ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107: 300-308.
[21] Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010; 38: e2-e16.
[22] Stevenson B, Ibbetson R. The effect of the substructure on the colour of samples/restorations veneered with ceramic: a literature review. J Dent. 2010; 38: 361-368.
[23] Kürklü D, Azer SS, Yilmaz B, Johnston WM. Porcelain thickness and cement shade effects on the colour and translucency of porcelain veneering materials. J Dent. 2013; 41: 1043-1050.
[24] Shimada K, Nakazawa M, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H. Influence of abutment materials on the resultant color of heat-pressed lithium disilicate ceramics. Dent Mater J. 2006; 25: 20-25.
[25] Dede DÖ, Sahin O, Özdemir OS, Yilmaz B, Celik E, Köroğlu A. Influence of the color of composite resin foundation and luting cement on the final color of lithium disilicate ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent.2017;117:138-143.
[26] Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88: 4-9.
[27] Capa N, Tuncel I, Tak O, Usumez A. The effect of luting cement and titanium base on the final color of zirconium oxide core material. J Prosthodont. 2017; 26: 136-140.
[28] Chu FC, Chow TW, Chai J. Contrast ratios and masking ability of three types of ceramic veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98: 359-364.
[29] Oh SH, Kim SG. Effect of abutment shade, ceramic thickness, and coping type on the final shade of zirconia all-ceramic restorations: in vitro study of color masking ability. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015; 7: 368-374.
[30] Smith T, Guild J. The CIE colorimetric standards and their use. Transaction of the Optical Society. 1931; 33: 73-134.
[31] Tabatabaian F, Masoomi F, Namdari M, Mahshid M. Effect of three different core materials on masking ability of a zirconia ceramic. J Dent (Tehran) 2016; 13: 340.
[32] Alghazali N, Burnside G, Moallem M, Smith P, Preston A, Jarad FD. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth. J Dent. 2012; 40: e10-e17.
[33] Ghinea R, Pérez MM, Herrera LJ, Rivas MJ, Yebra A, Paravina RD. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J Dent. 2010; 38: e57-e64.
[34] Shillingburg HT SD, Wilson EL, Cain JR, Mitchell DL, Blanco LJ, Kessler JC. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodo-ntics. 4th ed. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc: USA; 2012. p. 442-443. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,063 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 915 |
||
