پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,170 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,690 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 60,830,853 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,275,854 |
Comparative Effect of two Types of Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of New Composite to Old Composite | ||
| Journal of Dentistry | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 22، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 73، اسفند 2021، صفحه 229-234 اصل مقاله (377.32 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2021.84910.1106 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Seyedeh Maryam Tavangar1؛ Reza Tayefeh Davalloo2؛ Tayebeh Rostamzadeh2؛ Farideh Darabi2؛ Seyed Mohammad Ali Mirabolghasemi3؛ Reza Ahmadi* 2 | ||
| 1Dept. of Operative Dentistry, Dental Sciences Research Center, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. | ||
| 2Dept. of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. | ||
| 3General Dentist, Rasht, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Statement of the Problem: Composite restoration failures may occur because of different factors. In these situations, the repair of a composite restoration has many advantages over replacement such as saving time, lower cost, and lower risk of excessive removal of sound tooth structure and subsequent pulp exposure. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of two surface treatments on shear bond strength (SBS) of new composite to old composite. Materials and Method: In this in vitro study ,60 composite discs were fabricated using a plexiglass mold measuring 4 mm in thickness and 7 mm in diameter, and were randomly divided into three groups (n=20). In group 1, the bonding procedure was done with no modification. After roughening of one surface in all remaining samples, chloroform (CHCl3) was applied on the surface of samples in group 2 and phosphoric acid 35% was applied on the surface of the samples in group 3. PermaSeal was then applied in all samples and new composites were bonded to the surface. The samples were stored in distilled water for one week and were then subjected to 500 thermal cycles and shear bond strength between two layers of composite and mode of failures were evaluated. Results: The lowest and the highest SBS values of repair composite to old composite were noted in groups 3 and 1, respectively and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).The difference between groups 1 and 2 was not significantly different (p = 0.197). The mode of failure was mixed in all samples of groups 2 and 3 and cohesive in group 1. Conclusion: After grinding, the surface treatment with phosphoric acid did not increase the SBS of new composite to old composite, while chloroform increased the SBS almost to the level of the baseline in control group. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Poly methyl Methacrylate؛ Composite Resins؛ PermaSeal؛ Chloroform؛ Dental Bonding | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Lucena-Martín C, González-López S, de Mondelo JMNR. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthe Dent. 2001; 68: 161-166.
[2] Sharif MO, Catleugh M, Merry A, Tickle M, Dunne SM, Brunton P, et al. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: Resin composite. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 17: CD005971.
[3] Park SS, Nam W, Eom AH, Kim DS, Choi GW, Choi KK. The study of fractural behavior of repaired composite. J Korean Academ Conserv Dent. 2010; 55: 181-121.
[4] Dall'Oca S, Papacchini F, Radovic I, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Repair potential of a laboratory-processednano-hybrid resin composite. J Oral Sci. 2008; 50: 403-412.
[5] Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, James C. Broome summitt’s fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach. 4th ed. Quintessence Publishing: Hanover Park, IL 60133; 2013. p. 556.
[6] Blum IR, Lynch CD, Wilson NH. Factors influencing repair of dental restorations with resin.composite. J Clin Cosmec Invest Dent. 2014; 6: 81.
[7] Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV. Studevant’s art & science of operative dentistry. 6th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences: St. Louis; 2013. p. 122.
[8] Özcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GAP, Bottino MA. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 1276-1282.
[9] Bonstein T, Garlapo D, John D, Bush P. Evaluation of Varied Repair Protocols Applied to Aged Composite Resin. J Adhesive Dent. 2005; 7: 41-49.
[10] Ahmadizenouz Gh, Esmaeili B, Taghvaei A, Jamali Z, Jafari T, Amiri*Daneshvar F, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016; 10: 9–16.
[11] Hemadri M, Saritha G, Rajasekhar V, AmitPachlag K, Purushotham R, Kishore Kumarreddy V. Shear bond strength of repaired composites using surface treatments and repair materials: an in vitro Study. J Int Oral Health. 2014; 6: 22–25.
[12] Shen C, Colaizzi FA, Birns B. Strength of denture repairs as influenced by surface treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52: 844-848.
[13] Weiner S, Krause AS, Nicholas W. Esthetic modification of removable partial denture teeth with light-cured composites. J of Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57: 381-384.
[14] Celik EU, Ergücü Z, Türkün LS, UK Ercan. Tensile bond strength of an aged resin composite repaired with different protocols. J Adhes Dent. 2011; 13: 359-366.
[15] Frencken JE, Peters MC, Manton DJ, Leal SC, Gordan VV, Eden E. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries- a review: Report of a FDI task group. Int Dent J. 2012; 62: 223-243.
[16] Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 528-534.
[17] Vankerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, van Beylen M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surfaces of composite resins. J Dent Res. 1982; 61: 791-795.
[18] Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Investig. 2009; 13: 317-323.
[19] Da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent. 2012; 40: 513-521.
[20] Melo MA, Moysés MR, Santos SG, Alcântara CE, Ribeiro JC. Effects of different surface treatments and accelerated artificialaging on the bond strength of composite resin repairsn. Braz Oral Res. 2011; 25: 485-491.
[21] Bacchi A, Consani RL, Sinhoreti MA, Feitosa VP, Cavalcante LM, Pfeifer CS, et al. Repair bond strength inaged methacrylate- and silorane-based composites. J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15: 447-452.
[22] Gupta S, Parolia A, Jain A, Kundabala M, Mohan M, de*Moraes*Porto ICC. A comparative effect of various surface chemical treatments on the resin composite-composite repair bond strength. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015; 33: 245.
[23] Junior S, Ferracane J, Bona A. influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mat. 2009; 25: 442-451.
[24] Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R, Skibbe D, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Repair Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composite after Different Surface and Bonding Treatments. Materials. 2016; 9: 547.
[25] Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent. 2008; 36: 969–976.
[26] Rotstein I, Cohenca N, Teperovich E, Moshonov J, Mor C, Roman I, et al. Effect of chloroform, xylene, and halothane on enamel and dentin microhardness of human teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999; 87: 366–368.
[27] Rehman K, Khan FR, Aman N. Comparison of orange oil and chloroform as gutta-percha solvents in endodontic retreatment. J Contemp Dent Prac.2013; 14: 478.
[28] Azar MR, Khojastehpour L, Iranpour N. A comparison of the effectiveness of chloroform in dissolving resilon andgutta- percha. J Dent Tehran. 2011; 8: 19–24.
[29] Vajrabhaya LO, Suwannawong SK, Kamolroongwarakul R, Pewklieng L. Cytotoxicity evaluation of gutta-percha solvents: Chloroform and GP-Solvent (limonene). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho Oral Radio Endo. 2004; 98: 7569.
[30] Ribeiro DA, Matsumoto MA, Marques ME, Salvadori DM. Biocompatibility of gutta-perchasolvents using in vitro mammalian test-system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho Oral Radio Endo. 2007; 103: e106-e109.
[31] Johann J, Martos J, Silveira LF, Del*Pino FA. Use of organic solvents in endodontics: A review. Rev Clin Pesq Odontol. 2006; 2: 393-399.
[32] McDonald MN, Vire DE. Chloroform in the endodontic operatory. J Endo. 1992; 18: 301-303. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,406 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,818 |
||
