LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,438
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,224
Keshavarz, Marzieh, Eslami, Jamshid, Abedi-Firouzjah, Razzagh, Mortazavi, Seyed Alireza, Abbasi, Samaneh, Mortazavi, Ghazal. (1401). How Do Different Physical Stressors’ Affect the Mercury Release from Dental Amalgam Fillings and Microleakage? A Systematic Review. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(3), 227-236. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009-1175
Marzieh Keshavarz; Jamshid Eslami; Razzagh Abedi-Firouzjah; Seyed Alireza Mortazavi; Samaneh Abbasi; Ghazal Mortazavi. "How Do Different Physical Stressors’ Affect the Mercury Release from Dental Amalgam Fillings and Microleakage? A Systematic Review". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12, 3, 1401, 227-236. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009-1175
Keshavarz, Marzieh, Eslami, Jamshid, Abedi-Firouzjah, Razzagh, Mortazavi, Seyed Alireza, Abbasi, Samaneh, Mortazavi, Ghazal. (1401). 'How Do Different Physical Stressors’ Affect the Mercury Release from Dental Amalgam Fillings and Microleakage? A Systematic Review', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(3), pp. 227-236. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009-1175
Keshavarz, Marzieh, Eslami, Jamshid, Abedi-Firouzjah, Razzagh, Mortazavi, Seyed Alireza, Abbasi, Samaneh, Mortazavi, Ghazal. How Do Different Physical Stressors’ Affect the Mercury Release from Dental Amalgam Fillings and Microleakage? A Systematic Review. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 12(3): 227-236. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009-1175

How Do Different Physical Stressors’ Affect the Mercury Release from Dental Amalgam Fillings and Microleakage? A Systematic Review

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 2، دوره 12، شماره 3، شهریور 2022، صفحه 227-236    اصل مقاله (1.06 M)
نوع مقاله: Systematic Review
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009-1175
نویسندگان
Marzieh Keshavarz1؛ Jamshid Eslami2؛ Razzagh Abedi-Firouzjah3؛ Seyed Alireza Mortazavi4؛ Samaneh Abbasi5؛ Ghazal Mortazavi* 6
1MSc, Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, School of Nursing, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3MSc, Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
4MD, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
5MSc Student, Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
6DDS, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده
Background: Approximately 50% of dental amalgam is elemental mercury by weight. Accumulating body of evidence now shows that not only static magnetic fields (SMF) but both ionizing and non-ionizing electromagnetic radiations can increase the rate of mercury release from dental amalgam fillings. Iranian scientists firstly addressed this issue in 2008 but more than 10 years later, it became viral worldwide.
Objective: This review was aimed at evaluating available data on the magnitude of the effects of different physical stressors (excluding chewing and brushing) on the release of toxic mercury from dental amalgam fillings and microleakage.
Material and Methods: The papers reviewed in this study were searched from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus (up to 1 December 2019). The keywords were identified from our initial research matching them with those existing on the database of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). The non-English papers and other types of articles were not included in this review.
Results: Our review shows that exposure to static magnetic fields (SMF) such as those generated by MRI, electromagnetic fields (EMF) such as those produced by mobile phones; ionizing electromagnetic radiations such as X-rays and non- Ionizing electromagnetic radiation such as lasers and light cure devices can significantly increase the release of mercury from dental amalgam restorations and/or cause microleakage.
Conclusion: The results of this review show that a wide variety of physical stressors ranging from non-ionizing electromagnetic fields to ionizing radiations can significantly accelerate the release of mercury from amalgam and cause microleakage.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Amalgam؛ Mercury؛ Magnetic Resonance Imaging؛ Microleakage؛ Radiation؛ Electromagnetic؛ Radiofrequency
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Branco V, Caito S, Farina M, Teixeira da Rocha J, Aschner M, Carvalho C. Biomarkers of mercury toxicity: Past, present, and future trends. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2017;20(3):119-54. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2017.1289834. PubMed PMID: 28379072. PubMed PMCID: PMC6317349.
  2. Diaz Barriga F. Modulators of mercury risk to wildlife and humans in the context of rapid global change. Ambio. 2018;47(2):170-97. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-1011-x. PubMed PMID: 29388128. PubMed PMCID: PMC5794686.
  3. Hawley DM, Hallinger KK, Cristol DA. Compromised immune competence in free-living tree swallows exposed to mercury. Ecotoxicology. 2009;18(5):499-503. doi: 10.1007/s10646-009-0307-4. PubMed PMID: 19322655.
  4. Lewis CA, Cristol DA, Swaddle JP, Varian-Ramos CW, Zwollo P. Decreased immune response in zebra finches exposed to sublethal doses of mercury. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;64(2):327-36. doi: 10.1007/s00244-012-9830-z. PubMed PMID: 23229191.
  5. Hu XF, Eccles KM, Chan HM. High selenium exposure lowers the odds ratios for hypertension, stroke, and myocardial infarction associated with mercury exposure among Inuit in Canada. Environ Int. 2017;102:200-6. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.03.002. PubMed PMID: 28279481.
  6. Zhang QF, Li YW, Liu ZH, Chen QL. Exposure to mercuric chloride induces developmental damage, oxidative stress and immunotoxicity in zebrafish embryos-larvae. Aquat Toxicol. 2016;181:76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.10.029. PubMed PMID: 27821350.
  7. Crowe W, Allsopp PJ, Watson GE, Magee PJ, Strain JJ, Armstrong DJ, Ball E, McSorley EM. Mercury as an environmental stimulus in the development of autoimmunity–A systematic review. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2017;16(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.09.020. PubMed PMID: 27666813.
  8. Tchounwou PB, Ayensu WK, Ninashvili N, Sutton D. Environmental exposure to mercury and its toxicopathologic implications for public health. Environ Toxicol. 2003;18(3):149-75. doi: 10.1002/tox.10116. PubMed PMID: 12740802.
  9. Steuerwald U, Weihe P, Jørgensen PJ, Bjerve K, Brock J, Heinzow B, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Grandjean P. Maternal seafood diet, methylmercury exposure, and neonatal neurologic function. J Pediatr. 2000;136(5):599-605. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2000.102774. PubMed PMID: 10802490.
  10. Basu N, Stamler CJ, Loua KM, Chan HM. An interspecies comparison of mercury inhibition on muscarinic acetylcholine receptor binding in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;205(1):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.09.009. PubMed PMID: 15885266.
  11. Clarkson TW, Magos L. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006;36(8):609-62. doi: 10.1080/10408440600845619. PubMed PMID: 16973445.
  12. Scheuhammer AM, Sandheinrich MB. Recent advances in the toxicology of methylmercury in wildlife. Ecotoxicology. 2008;17(2):67-8. doi: 10.1525/california/9780520271630.003.001.
  13. Depew DC, Basu N, Burgess NM, Campbell LM, et al. Toxicity of dietary methylmercury to fish: derivation of ecologically meaningful threshold concentrations. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2012;31(7):1536-47. doi: 10.1002/etc.1859.
  14. Bridges KN, Soulen BK, Overturf CL, Drevnick PE, Roberts AP. Embryotoxicity of maternally transferred methylmercury to fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol Chem. 2016;35(6):1436-41. doi: 10.1002/etc.3282. PubMed PMID: 26471903.
  15. Landler L, Painter MS, Coe BH, Youmans PW, Hopkins WA, Phillips JB. High levels of maternally transferred mercury disrupt magnetic responses of snapping turtle hatchlings (Chelydra serpentina). Environ Pollut. 2017;228:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.050. PubMed PMID: 28501632.
  16. Wada H, Cristol DA, McNabb FA, Hopkins WA. Suppressed adrenocortical responses and thyroid hormone levels in birds near a mercury-contaminated river. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(15):6031-8. doi: 10.1021/es803707f. PubMed PMID: 19731714.
  17. Hopkins BC, Willson JD, Hopkins WA. Mercury exposure is associated with negative effects on turtle reproduction. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(5):2416-22. doi: 10.1021/es304261s. PubMed PMID: 23360167.
  18. Tartu S, Lendvai ÁZ, Blévin P, Herzke D, et al. Increased adrenal responsiveness and delayed hatching date in relation to polychlorinated biphenyl exposure in Arctic-breeding black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2015;219:165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.12.018. PubMed PMID: 25796954
  19. Woods JS, Heyer NJ, Russo JE, Martin MD, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of catechol-O-methyltransferase modify the neurobehavioral effects of mercury in children. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2014;77(6):293-312. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2014.867210. PubMed PMID: 24593143. PubMed PMCID: PMC3967503.
  20. Woods JS, Heyer NJ, Russo JE, Martin MD, Farin FM. Genetic polymorphisms affecting susceptibility to mercury neurotoxicity in children: Summary findings from the Casa Pia Children’s Amalgam Clinical Trial. Neurotoxicology. 2014;44:288-302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.07.010. PubMed PMID: 25109824. PubMed PMCID: PMC4176692.
  21. Suzuki T, Imura N, Clarkson TW. Advances in mercury toxicology. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
  22. Hartwig A, Asmuss M, Ehleben I, Herzer U, et al. Interference by toxic metal ions with DNA repair processes and cell cycle control: molecular mechanisms. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(Suppl 5):797-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s5797.9. PubMed PMID: 12426134. PubMed PMCID: PMC1241248.
  23. Morales ME, Derbes RS, Ade CM, Ortego JC, et al. Heavy metal exposure influences double strand break DNA repair outcomes. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151367. PubMed PMID: 26966913. PubMed PMCID: PMC4788447.
  24. Nersesyan A, Kundi M, Waldherr M, Setayesh T, et al, Barcelos GR, Knasmueller S. Results of micronucleus assays with individuals who are occupationally and environmentally exposed to mercury, lead and cadmium. Mutat Res. 2016;770(Pt A):119-39. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.04.002. PubMed PMID: 27894681.
  25. Andreoli V, Sprovieri F. Genetic aspects of susceptibility to mercury toxicity: an overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(1):93. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010093. PubMed PMID: 28106810. PubMed PMCID: PMC5295343.
  26. McGuire T. Chronic mercury poisoning and mercury detoxification. Townsend Letter: The Examiner of Alternative Medicine. 2007;287:96-106.
  27. Gao Z, Ying X, Yan J, Wang J, Cai S, Yan C. Acute mercury vapor poisoning in a 3-month-old infant: A case report. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;465:119-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.12.019. PubMed PMID: 28027882.
  28. Mortazavi SMJ, Neghab M, Anoosheh SM, et al. High-field MRI and mercury release from dental amalgam fillings. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2014;5(2):101-5. PubMed PMID: 24748001. PubMed PMCID: PMC7767616.
  29. Berdouses E, Vaidyanathan TK, Dastane A, Weisel C, Houpt M, Shey Z. Mercury release from dental amalgams: an in vitro study under controlled chewing and brushing in an artificial mouth. J Dent Res. 1995;74(5):1185-93. doi: 10.1177/00220345950740050701. PubMed PMID: 7790596.
  30. Oskoee SS, Bahari M, Kimyai S, Rikhtegaran S, Puralibaba F, Ajami H. Effect of Nd: YAG laser pulse energy on mercury vapor release from the dental amalgam. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013;31(10):480-5. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3549. PubMed PMID: 24053716.
  31. Mortazavi SMJ, Mortazavi G. Ex Vivo Mercury Release from Dental Amalgam. Radiology. 2018;289(1):273-74. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181576. PubMed PMID: 30179106.
  32. Kursun S, Öztas B, Atas H, Tastekin M. Effects of X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging on mercury release from dental amalgam into artificial saliva. Oral Radiology. 2014;30(2):142-6. doi: 10.1007/s11282-013-0154-0.
  33. Mortazavi SMJ, Daiee E, Yazdi A, Khiabani K, Kavousi A, Vazirinejad R. Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use. Pak J Biol Sci. 2008;11(8):1142-6. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.1142.1146. PubMed PMID: 18819554.
  34. BBC. Metal fillings ‘leak mercury after scan’ - BBC News. BBC; 2018.
  35. Mortazavi G, Haghani M, Rastegarian N, Zarei S, Mortazavi SMJ. Increased release of mercury from dental amalgam fillings due to maternal exposure to electromagnetic fields as a possible mechanism for the high rates of autism in the offspring: introducing a hypothesis. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2016;6(1):41-6. PubMed PMID: 27026954. PubMed PMCID: PMC4795328.
  36. Mortazavi SMJ, Mortazavi G, Paknahad M. Mercury transmitted from mother’s with amalgam dental fillings to fetus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(5):594. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1180359. PubMed PMID: 27090019.
  37. Mortazavi SMJ, Mortazavi G, Paknahad M. Dental metal-induced innate reactivity in keratinocytes. Toxicol in Vitro. 2016;33:180-1. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.02.016. PubMed PMID: 26928047.
  38. Mortazavi SMJ, Mortazavi G, Paknahad M. Quantification of Hg excretion and distribution in biological samples of mercury-dental-amalgam users and its correlation with biological variables. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017;24(9):8889-90. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8530-7. PubMed PMID: 28160179.
  39. Unal Erzurumlu Z, Guler C, Uslu Cender E, Cakıcı EB, Cankaya S. The effect of 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations. Microsc Res Tech. 2019;82(11):1878-83. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23355. PubMed PMID: 31368622.
  40. Yilmaz S, Adisen MZ. Ex vivo mercury release from dental amalgam after 7.0-T and 1.5-T MRI. Radiology. 2018;288(3):799-803. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172597. PubMed PMID: 29944087.
  41. Hosseini MA, Mehdizadeh AR, Sanipour L, Afrasyabi MR, Shiravani MH, Asmarian N, Zamani A. The assessment of mercury released from dental amalgams after exposure to Wi-Fi and X-Ray radiation in artificial Saliva. Eurasian J Anal Chem. 2018;13(2):em08. doi: 10.29333/ejac/84805.
  42. Paknahad M, Mortazavi SMJ, Shahidi S, Mortazavi G, Haghani M. Effect of radiofrequency radiation from Wi-Fi devices on mercury release from amalgam restorations. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2016;14:12. doi: 10.1186/s40201-016-0253-z. PubMed PMID: 27418965. PubMed PMCID: PMC4944481.
  43. Mortazavi G, Mortazavi SAR, Mehdizadeh AR. “Triple M” Effect: A Proposed Mechanism to Explain Increased Dental Amalgam Microleakage after Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2018;8(1):141-6. PubMed PMID: 29732349. PubMed PMCID: PMC5928305.
  44. Mortazavi SMJ, Nazhvani AD, Paknahad M. Synergistic Effect of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields of Dental Light Cure Devices and Mobile Phones Accelerates the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2019;9(2):227-32. PubMed PMID: 31214528. PubMed PMCID: PMC6538905.
  45. Akgun OM, Polat GG, Illca AT, Yildirim C, Demir P, Basak F. Does magnetic resonance imaging affect the microleakage of amalgam restorations? Iran J Radiol. 2014;11(3):e15565. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.15565. PubMed PMID: 25763074. PubMed PMCID: PMC4341166.
  46. Shahidi SH, Bronoosh P, Alavi AA, Zamiri B, et al. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38(7):470-4. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30077669. PubMed PMID: 19767518.
  47. Berglund A, Bergdahl J. Influence of low frequency magnetic fields on the intra-oral release of mercury vapor from amalgam restorations. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(2 Pt 1):671-4. PubMed PMID: 9584915.
  48. Müller-Miny H, Erber D, Möller H, Müller-Miny B, Bongartz G. Is there a hazard to health by mercury exposure from amalgam due to MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;6(1):258-60. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880060146. PubMed PMID: 8851439.
  49. Paknahad M, Nazhvani AD, Jarideh S, Mozdarani H, et al. Increased Mercury release due to exposure to electromagnetic radiation as a limiting factor for using dental amalgam. Int J Radiat Res. 2016;14(4):355-9. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.14.4.355.
  50. Pioch T, Matthias J. Mercury vapor release from dental amalgam after laser treatment. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(1):600-2. doi: 10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-3-.x. PubMed PMID: 9527362.
  51. Austin DW, Spolding B, Gondalia S, Shandley K, et al. Genetic variation associated with hypersensitivity to mercury. Toxicol Int. 2014;21(3):236-41. doi: 10.4103/0971-6580.155327. PubMed PMID: 25948960. PubMed PMCID: PMC4413404.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,689
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 858


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب