Evaluation the Efficiency of Electrical Stimulation Advanced Methods on Management of Bowel and Bladder Functions in Spinal Cord Injury Subject; A Systematic Review of Literature

Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is defined as damage to spinal cord which results in loss of function, sensation and mobility depends on level of injury [1]. The injury incidence varied from a country to another country between 14 and 55 new cases per million populations each year [1-4]. These subjects miss their abilities to stand and walk and have to use various assistive devices to restore their abilities to walk and to ambulate from a place to place [5-8]. They suffer from joint contracture, inability to control bowel and bladder functions, problems with digestive system and cardiovascular impairment [9].

Various treatment approaches have been used for SCI to restore their abilities to stand and walk [6, 7]. However, bowel and bladder function control is another issue which should be emphasized [9-13]. Elbert study showed that bowel problems occur in 27% to 62% of the patients with SCI [14]. Moreover, the time spent to manage bowel and bladder is another important issue. Bowel and bladder function and automatic dysreflexia elimination seems to be the 1^st and 2^nd highest priorities for 39.7% and 38% of quadriplegia and paraplegia, respectively [15]. It should be emphasized that impaired bladder emptying is one of the important factor of urinary infection and stone formation, which finally lead to hydronephrosis and renal damage. Different approaches have being used to help SCI individuals to manage their bowel and bladder functions includes conventional method, stimulation of sacral nerve or abdominal muscles and surgery [11, 12, 16-19]. Intermittent catherization, indwelling catherization, manual expression and use of reflex bladder contraction are some of the conventional methods used in this regard [20]. Bowel management should be used for the subjects with SCI in order to achieve regular and predictable bowel empty at social acceptable time and place, avoid constipation and faecal incontinence and to manage bowel within reasonable time. Actually, various steps have been used to manage bowel and bladder functions includes change in dietary patterns and life style, abdominal massage, oral laxatives, digital anal stimulation, anal plugs, trans anal irrigation and electrical stimulation therapies.

Electrical stimulation includes magnetic stimulation use of sacral nerve or deep muscles which has been used to improve the social performance of bowel and bladder system [21, 22]. Various approaches have been recommended to be used for the subjects with spinal cord injury to manage their bowel and bladder functions. There are some reviews on the efficiency of diet and medicine use which supports the effects of these approaches on bowel and bladder functions management. However, the effects of other types of interventions are still controversial. Therefore, the main question posted here is that: which one of the aforementioned methods, except medicine and diet can be used successfully for this group of subjects to enhance their bowel and bladder function control in a social way. The purpose of this study was to determine the most user friendly approach of bowel and bladder control in SCI subjects based on the available literature.

Materials and Methods

A search was done in some data bases include PubMed, ISI web of knowledge, Scopus, and Google scholar between 1960 and 2020. Some keywords such as bowel and bladder management, functional electrical stimulation (FES), magnetic stimulation, exercise therapy, manual bowel and bladder management were used in combination with spinal cord injury. The papers were selected based on their titles and abstracts. Finally the papers were selected based on the following criteria:

1. The papers were published in English

2. Focus on the aforementioned key words

Type of Studies

Although the emphasize of this study was to focus mostly on randomized control trial (RCTs), due to lack of these studies on this topic, we included other type of studies. However, low level evidences such as abstracts, conference articles, editorials, comments and expert opinions were excluded from the final list.

Type of Participants

We intended to include people with spinal cord injuries.

Type of Interventions

Only studies that focus on various interventions use to control bowel and bladder functions in SCI were included and we excluded the studies on diet and medicines.

Secondary Outcomes

Any adverse effects reported in the included studies were considered as secondary outcomes.

The studies Selection

Two researchers independently screened the articles based on the inclusion criteria to determine their suitability. This was done mostly based on the abstracts and titles. If there was any sense of disagreement, a third researcher was enrolled.

Data Extraction and Management

In this review, data extraction was based on population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO). We tried to include duration of follow up, outcome assessed and also we reported any adverse effects of the mentioned treatment approaches. Some parameters such as number of selected subjects, lesion type, lesion level, procedure used, and final outcomes were summarized.

Quality Assessment and Determination of the Bias Risk

The studies quality was evaluated by Pedro tool using. Actually Pedro scale was developed to measure methodological quality of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials in physical therapy. However, now it has been used to assess the quality of studies with different health care interventions such as exercise, psychological, behavioral interventions and medical and pharmacological interventions [23]. This scale has a high degree of reliability to assess the quality of various research studies. This scale comprises 11 items includes inclusion criteria and source, random allocation, allocation concealment, baseline comparability, subjects blinding, therapists blinding, assessment blinding, follow up, intention to treat analysis, between group comparison and point estimate and variability [23,24].

Results

Based on the aforementioned key words, 100 paper were selected. Forty-three papers were selected after screening the papers based on titles and abstracts. Finally, 21 papers were selected in which 3 research were on abdominal muscles stimulation [21, 22, 25], one on tibial nerve stimulation [26], 8 papers on stimulation of sacral nerve root and conus medularis [16, 18, 27-32],  2 on stimulation and exercise combination [33, 34], 4 on brindley bladder control use [35-38] and 3 on sacralizotomy in combination with implantation of anterior sacral stimulator [39-41]. Tables 1-4 also show the quality of studies selected in this review article. As it can be seen, the quality of the papers on abdominal muscles stimulation various between 6 and 7. For the papers on stimulation of tibial nerve, the quality was 6. The quality of the papers on stimulation of sacral nerve root and conus medularis varied between 5 and 6. There were only two papers on stimulation and exercise combination with quality of 5-6. Most of the papers published on brindley bladder control had quality between 5 and 6.

Tables 1-4 summarized the methods and the outcomes of the studies. As it can be seen from these tables, the number of subjects was high in some studies. Moreover, most of the subjects were monitored for a long period of time. The results of the reviewed studies can be summarized as follow:

Neuro-electrical-muscle-stimulation (NEMS) significantly decreased force dutal capacity and influence colonic transit, Functional-magnetic-stimulation (FMS) is able to stimulate colon and reduce colon transmit time (CTT), Functional magnetic stimulation can be used to treat neurological bowel dysfunction in SCI, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and exercise helps to improve function of bladder, Posterior sacral root rhizotomy seems to be a safe and effective method, Sacral rhizotomy combined with implantation of anterior sacral root stimulation is valuable method to restore bladder function in SCI suffer from hyperactive bladder, Sacral anterior root stimulator helps SCI to achieve complete transited defection, and Most of the subjects received sacral nerve stimulation reported an improvement in quality of life.

Discussion

There is no doubt that most of the subjects with spinal cord injury missed their abilities to control their bowel and bladder functions. This limits their daily performance and also their social activities. Various methods have been used to restore the abilities of these subjects to control their bowel and bladder function. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a method recommended in this regard. Various methods of stimulation have being used for SCI subjects. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the published literature in this regard.

Stimulation of Tibial Nerve

There was only one study on tibial nerve stimulation to control bowel and bladder function [26]. The quality of this study based on Pedro scale was 6. The results of this study showed that it was an effective method to treat bowel and bladder function insufficiency in the subjects with partial spinal cord injury [26]. It should be emphasized that stimulation was performed for four weeks and were repeated every two months for three times, however, as the number of studies done on this topic was small, it is not easy to recommend this method (approach) to manage bowel and bladder function in this group of subjects.

Stimulation of Sacral Nerve Root and Conus Medularis

This is another approach to manage bowel and bladder functions in SCI. There were 7 studies published on this topic. Valleys et al., [32]  showed that using this method frequency of bowel movement significantly increased and time dedicated to bowel movement decreased. In the study of Michelson et al., [27] on 177 patients, the subjects were monitored for a period of 6 years. They concluded that sacral nerve stimulation is a simple method with minimal side effects, which provides excellent output to control bowel and bladder functions. Due to the number of subjects participated in these studies, and duration of follow up, it can be concluded that stimulation of sacral nerve root is a good approach to manage bowel and bladder function in SCI subjects.

Stimulation of Abdominal Muscles

As it can be seen in Table 1, there were 3 studies on abdominal muscles stimulation of SCI bowel function in individuals. The number of the subjects in these studies varied between 2 and 22 patients. The results of these studies showed that the subjects had an improvement in bowel function. Moreover, it influenced the colonic transit time.

Brindley Bladder Control

This is the other method recommended for SCI subjects. There were 4 studies published on this topic. Based on the results of the study of Egon et al., [35] bladder capacity increased after use of this method. Errection was also possible follow the use of this approach. Increased bladder capacity, complete bladder empting in most of the subjects, decreased in urinary tract infection, increased in activity of transverse column to rectum and improved quality of life were the advantages mentioned for use of this method [35, 36,37, 38].

Sacralizotomy with Anterior Sacral Stimulation

The results of the most studies showed that this method is an effective approach to help SCI subjects to manage their bowel and bladder function. However, the main complication which has been reported by using of this method, may be its influence on sexual function and erection in male SCI individuals. Schurch et al., [40]  showed that bladder capacity increased significantly with no major complications. The other advantages mentioned for this approach includes decreased in bowel program time, improved quality of life, improved socialization, decreased feeling of depression and improved self-image [39, 41].

Stimulation and Exercise

The other approach which consists of a stimulation and exercise combination was also recommended by Buhroo et al., [33]. The quality of their study was acceptable as 20 male subjects with SCI participated in this study. Some exercise was used to strength the lower abdomen and bladder muscles. Although there was only one study on this topic which confirmed that the physiotherapeutic procedure has tremendous potential to achieve improvement in control of bowel and bladder function.

From above mentioned studies and based on the results of quality assessment, it can be concluded that bowel and bladder control is not a big issue for this group of subjects in a social acceptable manner. Although stimulations of the muscles and nerve seems to be an improved approach to control bowel and bladder function, there are some issues that need to be resolved. Decreasing the stimulation electrodes infection risk, decreasing the side effects of this procedure on sexual performance of SCI subjects, and decreasing the threshold of stimulation are some problems which should be solved in future studies.

Conclusion

Based on the results of the studies done on functional electrical stimulation use for bowel and bladder functions management, this method seems to be successful for SCI subjects. Improved quality of life, socialization, and increased bowel and bladder functions are some advantages of using this procedure. It seems that strengthening of abdominal muscles, stimulation of these muscles, and combination of abdominal muscles stimulation and strengthening of abdominal muscles can be used as the first step to manage bowel and bladder functions in SCI subjects. Although other methods use have been also recommended for these subjects, it seems to be costlier and required especial facilities. Last but not least is that most of the studies done on limited number of subjects and mostly on male participants. Also no comparison was done between the outputs of various treatment approaches. Therefore, it is recommended to do a big study to cover the mentioned important comparisons.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) (IR.SUMS.REC.1397.587)

Conflict of Interests: None declared.

Consent for publication: Both authors agree with the publication of this article

Funding: This study was supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS)

Authors'' contributions: MTK: Concept and design; AFA: Analysis and interpretation; MTK: Data Collection; MTK & AFA: Writing the Article; MTK: Final Approval.

Acknowledgements: Not applicable