پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,089 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,995 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 26,389,739 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,281,265 |
Exploring the Epistemological Tools and Sources of Science and Religion | ||
| Trends in Pharmaceutical Sciences | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 7، شماره 2، شهریور 2021، صفحه 93-104 اصل مقاله (406.38 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Review Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/tips.2021.90960.1093 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Maryam Shamsaei* 1؛ Abdollah Gholami2 | ||
| 1: Associate Professor of Quran, Hadith and Medicine Research Center and Department of Islamic Education of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant professor of Center for interdisciplinary research in Islamic Education and Health sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| One of the topics of modern theology in the field of theological studies is to explain the relationship between science and religion from the perspective of thinkers and researchers. Researchers in this field have different perspectives to express the relationship between science and religion in a way that includes conflict, differentiation, interaction and adaptation. The relationship between science and religion can be examined from different angles, so what is more important It examines the "relationship between religion and science" from an epistemological perspective. In this study, exploring epistemological factors means the tools and cognitive resources of the products of science and religion. This research, which is descriptive-analytical and library method, has analyzed the data after collecting documents. Discussion about the sources and tools of cognition in the two fields of science and religion, shows that based on the different epistemological foundations that we see in these two approaches, both in the definition of tools and sources of cognition and in the amount of knowledge and realism of sources there is a difference. While the scientific approach is based on the denial of abstract beings. Therefore, on the subject of the relationship between science and religion, it is appropriate to extend the discussion of the analysis of tools and resources to the discussion of "epistemological foundations" While analyzing the ontological foundations of both, the fate of many scientific controversies will be clarified in more depth. In that case, the commonalities and differences between science and religion become clear. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| religious science؛ modern science؛ epistemology؛ cognition tools؛ epistemological foundations | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Jaki S. The Relevance of Physics. Edinburg Scottish Academic press.1992,p.111,422 2. Anees,M.A. What Islamic Science is Not” MAASJ . Islamic Science,(Aligarh) ,1986,2(1),p.9-19 3. Iqbal, M. Review of The Islamization of Science: For Muslim Positions Developing an Islamic Modernityby life Stenberg. J Islamic Studies,1997, Vol.36,No.3 4. Golshani M. since secular science until religious knowledge”,Tehran: Institute Humanities science and cultural studies,1998,p.33 5. Kalin I,”Three views of Science in the Islamic World”in God,Life and the Cosmos:Christian and Islamic Perspectives,eds,Ted Peters,Muzaffar Iqbal.Syed Nomanul Haq.Ashgate,2002,p.43-75 # 6. Palmer K,Nonduality and The Western WorldView:Nondual Science in a Broder Context, International Society of Systems Science Conference,2004,p.1# 7. Meysamy, S,Mulla Sadra, Tehran: Namak,2018,p.64 # 8. Mesbah M, Mohammadi, A, Epistemology of Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute Publications,2018,p.106,206 # 9. Tabatabai, S.M.H, Principles of Philosophy and Method of Realism, Tehran: Sadra Publications, 2018,Vol.1,p.42,164 70. Ibn Sina, H. A, Alaei Encyclopedia, Theology and Natural Sciences, Tehran: Dehkhoda Publications ,1974,vol.1,p.334# 11. Javadi Amoli A,The Real Life of Man in the Quran, Qom: Captivity2003,p.120-121 # 12. Javadi Amoli A, Rahiq Makhtoum, vol. 1/1, Qom: Esra Publishing Center,2007,p.74 # 13. Nasr S.H, Philosophy in the Land of Prophethood, Translator: Baitullah Naderloo, Tehran: Translator ,2017,p.127# 14. Malekshahi H, Translation and description of Ibn Sina's allusions and punishments, Tehran: Soroush Publications ,2006,p.185# 15. Sadr al-Muta'allehin, The transcendent wisdom in the four intellectual journeys, Ch. III, Beirut, Dar Al-Ahya Al-Tarath Al-Arabi,1981, vol. 8 ,p.158# 16. Ibn Sina, H.A,. , Al-Isharat wa al-Tanbihat, Qom: Nashr al-Balaghah, vol. 3, 1996,p.232 # 17. Makarem Shirazi N, The Message of the Quran (Knowledge in the Holy Quran), Tehran: Islamic Library,2005,vol.1,p.135,156 ,234-253# 18. Motahari M, Wisdom and Science, Tehran: Motahar Insight,2012,p.20 # 19. Jafari M.T, Knowledge from a scientific point of view and from the perspective of the Quran, Islamic Culture Publishing Office,1981, p.189,195-196# 20. Javadi Amoli A, Epistemology in the Quran, Qom: Qom Seminary Management Center,2014,p.407,409 # 21. Nasri A, Return from the Quran "A Critique of the Prophetic Reading from the World", Tehran, Scientific and Cultural Publications,2019,p.140-146 # 22. Thompson M, Philosophy Tutorial, translated by Behrouz Hassani, Tehran: Nashr-e No,2018, p.26# 23. Hallingdale, R.J., History of Western Philosophy, translated by Abdolhossein Azarang, Tehran: Phoenix Publications,2005,p.186 # 24. June A. Price, Understanding Philosophy, Translator: Reza Alizadeh, Tehran: Rozaneh,2010, Volume 2 ,p.122# 25. Parsania H,Hadith Peymaneh, Qom: Maaref Publications,2001,p.113 # 26. Foroughi M.A, The Course of Wisdom in Europe, Tehran: Niloufar,1965,p.140 # 27. Paya A, Analytical Philosophy: Issues and Perspectives, Tehran: New Plan,2003,p.476-479,485 # 28. Fa’ali, M.T , An Introduction to Religious and Contemporary Epistemology, Qom: Deputy of Teachers' Affairs,1998,p.352-353,356 # 29. Galloway A, Pannenberg, Historical Theology, translated by Morad Farhadpour,1996,p.34 30. Dixon T, Science and Religion, Translator: Mohammad Dehghani, Tehran: Mahrmi ,2011,p.39-40 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 960 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 380 |
||