LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,089
تعداد مقالات9,995
تعداد مشاهده مقاله26,176,395
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله7,235,782
Kermanian, Vahid, Taheri, Abdolmajid, Raeisi, Elham, Aazami, Mathias Hossain, Dayani, Mohamad-Ali, Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush. (1402). The Rationality to Requesting in-ward Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(4), 367-376. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009-1192
Vahid Kermanian; Abdolmajid Taheri; Elham Raeisi; Mathias Hossain Aazami; Mohamad-Ali Dayani; Daryoush Shahbazi-Gahrouei. "The Rationality to Requesting in-ward Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 4, 1402, 367-376. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009-1192
Kermanian, Vahid, Taheri, Abdolmajid, Raeisi, Elham, Aazami, Mathias Hossain, Dayani, Mohamad-Ali, Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush. (1402). 'The Rationality to Requesting in-ward Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(4), pp. 367-376. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009-1192
Kermanian, Vahid, Taheri, Abdolmajid, Raeisi, Elham, Aazami, Mathias Hossain, Dayani, Mohamad-Ali, Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush. The Rationality to Requesting in-ward Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 13(4): 367-376. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009-1192

The Rationality to Requesting in-ward Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 9، دوره 13، شماره 4، مهر و آبان 2023، صفحه 367-376    اصل مقاله (1.04 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009-1192
نویسندگان
Vahid Kermanian1؛ Abdolmajid Taheri1؛ Elham Raeisi* 2؛ Mathias Hossain Aazami3؛ Mohamad-Ali Dayani1؛ Daryoush Shahbazi-Gahrouei4
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Kashani and Hajar University Hospitals, School of Medicine, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
2Department of Medical Physics and Radiology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
3Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Kashani and Hajar University Hospitals, School of Medicine, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
4Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده
Background: Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable diagnostic tool by its non-invasive/non-ionizing nature.
Objective: This study aims to determine justification of MRI in hospitalized patients at a tertiary provincial referent medical center in a one-year period.
Material and Methods: In the present retrospective and descriptive cross-sectional study, 438 admitted patients referred for MRI during 2017 were selected using systematic random sampling. The age, gender, investigated organ, the specialty of requesting physician, MRI with and without contrast, MRI diagnostic outcome were collected using checklists. Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were used for data analysis.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 42±26 years-old and female represented 53% of enrolled patients. The most and less prevalent investigated organs were the cerebrum and the orbit. After excluding cancer diagnosis, cancer staging, and therapeutic follow-up exams, MRI request was oriented in 64.3% and 77.2% of positive results was concordant with aforementioned diagnostic orientation (P<0.001). Oriented diagnostic MRI requesting is influenced by age, medical specialists and, investigated organ (P<0.001). The positive MRI is influenced significantly by oriented MRI request, gender, medical specialists and investigated organ (P<0.001). The diagnosis concordance of MRI is influenced significantly by oriented MRI request, medical specialists and investigated organ (P<0.001). 
Conclusion: Appropriate implementation of medical imaging requires boosting employed rationality by the concerned physicians. The current suboptimal results to requesting MRI rationality should mandate supplementary educational programs as to incite the medical corpus more closely implementing the published medical practice guidelines.

تازه های تحقیق

Vahid Kermanian (Google Scholar)

Elham Raeisi (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Magnetic Resonance Imaging؛ Rational Use؛ Admitted Patient؛ Diagnostic Imaging؛ Appropriateness؛ Cross Sectional Study؛ Data Analysis
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Grover VP, Tognarelli JM, Crossey MM, Cox IJ, Taylor-Robinson SD, McPhail MJ. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Principles and Techniques: Lessons for Clinicians. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(3):246-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2015.08.001. PubMed PMID: 26628842. PubMed PMCID: PMC4632105.
  2. Van Beek EJR, Kuhl C, Desmond P, Ehman RL, Gong Q, Gold G, Gulani V, et al. Value of MRI in medicine: More than just another test? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(7):e14-e25. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26211. PubMed PMID: 30145852. PubMed PMCID: PMC7036752.
  3. McGowan JC. Basic principles of magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2008;18(4):623-36. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2008.06.004. PubMed PMID: 19068405.
  4. Hui M. Chapter 20: basic principles of magnetic resonance imaging, Molecular Imaging Probes for Cancer Research, World Scientific Chen XX, editor. 2012. p. 581-609.
  5. Hennig J, Speck O, Koch MA, Weiller C. Functional magnetic resonance imaging: a review of methodological aspects and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;18(1):1-15. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10330. PubMed PMID: 12815634.
  6. Schröder FF, Post CE, Wagenaar FC, Verdonschot N, Huis in’t Veld RM. MRI as Diagnostic Modality for Analyzing the Problematic Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;51(2):446-58. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26874. PubMed PMID: 31332865. PubMed PMCID: PMC7003732.
  7. Taylor SA, Mallett S, Ball S, Beare S, Bhatnagar G, Bhowmik A, Boavida P, Bridgewater J, Clarke CS, Duggan M, Ellis S. Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI versus standard imaging pathways for metastatic disease in newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer: the prospective streamline L trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(6):523-32. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30090-6. PubMed PMID: 31080129. PubMed PMCID: PMC6529610.
  8. Miles A, Taylor SA, Evans RE, Halligan S, Beare S, Bridgewater J, Goh V, Janes S, Navani N, Oliver A, Morton A. Patient preferences for whole-body MRI or conventional staging pathways in lung and colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(7):3889-900. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06153-4. PubMed PMID: 30937589. PubMed PMCID: PMC6554244.
  9. Heverhagen JT, Pfestroff K, Heverhagen AE, Klose KJ, Kessler K, Sitter H. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective evaluation of patients with suspected appendicitis (diamond). J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35(3):617-23. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22854. PubMed PMID: 22033948.
  10. Gómez-García JM, Gómez-Romero FJ, Arencibia-Jiménez M, Navarro-Gracia JF, Sánchez-Mollá M. Appropriateness of magnetic resonance imaging requested by primary care physicians for patients with knee pain. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018;30(7):565-70. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy067. PubMed PMID: 29635290.
  11. Katti G, Ara SA, Shireen A. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–A review. International Journal of Dental Clinics. 2011;3(1):65-70.
  12. Bianco A, Zucco R, Lotito F, Pavia M. To what extent do hospitalised patients receive appropriate CT and MRI scans? Results of a cross-sectional study in Southern Italy. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018125. PubMed PMID: 29440209. PubMed PMCID: PMC5829596.
  13. Hendee WR, Becker GJ, Borgstede JP, Bosma J, Casarella WJ, Erickson BA, et al. Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. 2010;257(1):240-5. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100063. PubMed PMID: 20736333.
  14. Baker LC. Acquisition of MRI equipment by doctors drives up imaging use and spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(12):2252-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1099. PubMed PMID: 21134927.
  15. Nevedal AL, Lewis ET, Wu J, Jacobs J, Jarvik JG, Chou R, Barnett PG. Factors Influencing Primary Care Providers’ Unneeded Lumbar Spine MRI Orders for Acute, Uncomplicated Low-Back Pain: a Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(4):1044-51. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05410-y. PubMed PMID: 31832927. PubMed PMCID: PMC7174262.
  16. Baloescu C. Diagnostic Imaging in Emergency Medicine: How Much Is Too Much? Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72(6):637-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.06.034. PubMed PMID: 30146444.
  17. Gidwani R, Sinnott P, Avoundjian T, Lo J, Asch SM, Barnett PG. Inappropriate ordering of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: are providers Choosing Wisely? Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(2):e68-76. PubMed PMID: 26881322.
  18. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB. Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(6):1491-502. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1491. PubMed PMID: 18997204. PubMed PMCID: PMC2765780.
  19. Oikarinen H, Karttunen A, Pääkkö E, Tervonen O. Survey of inappropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging. Insights Imaging. 2013;4(5):729-33. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0276-2. PubMed PMID: 23949843. PubMed PMCID: PMC3781254.
  20. Bouëtté A, Karoussou-Schreiner A, Le Pointe H, Grieten M, de Kerviler E, et al. National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg. Insights Imaging. 2019;10(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0731-9. PubMed PMID: 31111303. PubMed PMCID: PMC6527721.
  21. Jahanmehr N, Bigdeli AS, Salari H, Mokarami H, KhodaKarim S, Damiri S. Analyzing inappropriate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prescriptions and resulting economic burden on patients suffering from back pain. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019;34(4):e1437-47. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2806. PubMed PMID: 31271228.
  22. Sadeghi A, Keshavarz K, Sadat Ahmadzadeh M, Yousefi A. Survey of appropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging services provided in shahid chamran hospital of Shiraz. Journal of Health Research in Community. 2015;1(3):33-40.
  23. Sedaghat M, Rashidian A, Hoseini SD. Is lumbosacral MRI in complementary health insured patients, requested based on scientific guidelines. Tehran Univ Med Sci. 2013;71(6):382-8.
  24. Sherman SL, Gulbrandsen TR, Lewis HA, Gregory MH, Capito NM, Gray AD, Bal BS. Overuse of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of moderate to severe osteoarthritis. Iowa Orthop J. 2018;38:33-7. PubMed PMID: 30104922. PubMed PMCID: PMC6047403.
  25. Vejdani M, Taleghani YM, Kachooei AR, Hosseini R, Salehi S, Foji S, Goudarzian M, Fattahzadeh-Ardalani G. Appropriateness of knee MRI prescriptions in a hospital of Birjand, 2014. Int J Sci Rep. 2015;1(8):299.
  26. Emery DJ, Shojania KG, Forster AJ, Mojaverian N, Feasby TE. Overuse of magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(9):823-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3804. PubMed PMID: 23529302.
  27. Barzin M, Alaee AR, Gholian Jooibari S. MRI findings in patients with headache referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital, Sari, Iran, from October 2007 to February 2009. J Mazand Univ Medical Sci. 2009;20(75):65-9.
  28. Khoury M, Tolentino M, Haj-Ahmad Z, Lilek C, Law MP. Assessing Appropriateness of CT and MRI Referrals for Headache and Lumbar: A Canadian Perspective on Patient-Centered Referrals. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019;50(4):506-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2019.08.007. PubMed PMID: 31734105.
  29. Wang KY, Yen CJ, Chen M, Variyam D, Acosta TU, Reed B, Wintermark M, Lincoln CM. Reducing Inappropriate Lumbar Spine MRI for Low Back Pain: Radiology Support, Communication and Alignment Network. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(1 Pt A):116-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.005. PubMed PMID: 28969974.
  30. Xu SS, Berkovitz N, Li O, Garvin G. Reduction in inappropriate MRI knee studies after implementation of an appropriateness checklist: Experience at a tertiary care centre. Eur J Radiol. 2020;123:108781. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108781. PubMed PMID: 31877510.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 17,941
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 257


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب