LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,089
تعداد مقالات9,995
تعداد مشاهده مقاله26,517,353
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله7,299,466
Hashem Boroojerdi, Motahareh, Rahimi, Abbas, Roostayee, Mohammad Mohsen, Talebian Moghaddam, Saeed, Yousefi, Mohammad, Shamounian, Edgar, Norouzi, Mahmoud. (1400). Thoracic and Lumbar Sagittal Spinal Curvature Adaptations between Elite Iranian Road and Speed Cyclists. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(3), 297-304. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1058
Motahareh Hashem Boroojerdi; Abbas Rahimi; Mohammad Mohsen Roostayee; Saeed Talebian Moghaddam; Mohammad Yousefi; Edgar Shamounian; Mahmoud Norouzi. "Thoracic and Lumbar Sagittal Spinal Curvature Adaptations between Elite Iranian Road and Speed Cyclists". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 3, 1400, 297-304. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1058
Hashem Boroojerdi, Motahareh, Rahimi, Abbas, Roostayee, Mohammad Mohsen, Talebian Moghaddam, Saeed, Yousefi, Mohammad, Shamounian, Edgar, Norouzi, Mahmoud. (1400). 'Thoracic and Lumbar Sagittal Spinal Curvature Adaptations between Elite Iranian Road and Speed Cyclists', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(3), pp. 297-304. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1058
Hashem Boroojerdi, Motahareh, Rahimi, Abbas, Roostayee, Mohammad Mohsen, Talebian Moghaddam, Saeed, Yousefi, Mohammad, Shamounian, Edgar, Norouzi, Mahmoud. Thoracic and Lumbar Sagittal Spinal Curvature Adaptations between Elite Iranian Road and Speed Cyclists. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1400; 11(3): 297-304. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1058

Thoracic and Lumbar Sagittal Spinal Curvature Adaptations between Elite Iranian Road and Speed Cyclists

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 5، دوره 11، شماره 3، مرداد و شهریور 2021، صفحه 297-304    اصل مقاله (545.61 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1058
نویسندگان
Motahareh Hashem Boroojerdi1؛ Abbas Rahimi* 1؛ Mohammad Mohsen Roostayee1؛ Saeed Talebian Moghaddam2؛ Mohammad Yousefi1، 3؛ Edgar Shamounian4؛ Mahmoud Norouzi5
1PhD, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2PhD, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3PhD, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Sports Biomechanic, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
4PhD. Department of Physical Education & Sport Sciences (Sport Management), Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
5MSc. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background: Despite existing some research on the effects of professional cycling on cyclist’s spinal curvature angles, no research is available concentrating on possible differences in various types of professional cycling. Road (outdoor) and speed (indoor) cyclists have different anthropometric and predominant postures during cycling. The current study aims to investigate if cyclists with different types of cycling may have dissimilar spinal curvature adaptations.
Objective: Forty-eight male subjects, including 16 elite road cyclists, 16 elite sprint cyclists and 16 non-athletes as the control group were recruited in this non-experimental study.
Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a spinal mouse was used to measure the thoracic and lumbar curvature angles in standing position.
Results: The mean values of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angles were found as follows: 48.3±7.2º & -20.3±7.2º for elite road cyclists; 46.6±8.1º & -22.5±7.7º for elite sprint cyclists; and 37.5±4.1º & -19±6.3º for the control group. The results confirmed that both the road and sprint cyclists showed significantly more hyper-kyphosis posture in their thoracic region when compared to the control group (p <0.05).
Conclusion: All road cyclists showed no significantly higher degrees of thoracic angle relative to the sprint cyclists (p>0.05). However, all the cyclists and the control groups showed a normal range of lumbar lordosis angle. As a conclusion, the results of this study confirmed that an elite cyclist may predispose these subjects to the risk of hyper-kyphotic posture. The road cycling may result in more hyper-kyphosis due to the longer time, spent in flexed position.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Lordosis؛ Kyphosis؛ Adaptations؛ Athletes
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Rajabi R, Doherty P, Goodarzi M, Hemayattalab R. Comparison of thoracic kyphosis in two groups of elite Greco-Roman and freestyle wrestlers and a group of non-athletic participants. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2008;42(3):229-32. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.033639.
  2. López-Miñarro PA, Alacid F, Rodríguez-García PL. Comparison of sagittal spinal curvatures and hamstring muscle extensibility among young elite paddlers and non-athletes. International Sport Med Journal. 2010;11(2):301-12.
  3. Muyor JM, López-Miñarro PA, Alacid F. Spinal posture of thoracic and lumbar spine and pelvic tilt in highly trained cyclists. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2011;10(2):355-61. PubMed PMID: 24149883. PubMed PMCID: PMC3761866.
  4. Muyor JM, López-Miñarro PA, Alacid F. Comparison of sagittal lumbar curvature between elite cyclists and non-athletes. Science & Sports. 2013;28(6):e167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2013.04.003.
  5. Kums T, Ereline J, Vain A. Spinal curvature and trunk muscle tone in rhythmic gymnasts and untrained girls. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2007;20(2-3):87-95. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2007-202-306.
  6. Grabara M. Comparison of posture among adolescent male volleyball players and non-athletes. Biology of Sport. 2015;32(1):79. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1127286. PubMed PMID: 25729154. PubMed PMCID: PMC4314608.
  7. Grabara M. Sagittal spinal curvatures in adolescent male basketball players and non-training individuals–a two-year study. Science & Sports. 2016;31(5):e147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2016.01.010.
  8. Bruno AG, Anderson DE, Agostino JD, Bouxesin M. The effect of thoracic kyphosis and sagittal plane alignment on vertebral compressive loading. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2012;27(10):2144-51. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1658. PubMed PMID: 22589006. PubMed PMCID: PMC3431452.
  9. Iorio JA, Jakoi AM, Singla A. Biomechanics of degenerative spinal disorders. Asian Spine Journal. 2016;10(2):377-84. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.377. PubMed PMID: 25114783. PubMed PMCID: PMC4843079.
  10. Do Rosário JL. Biomechanical assessment of human posture: a literature review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014;18(3):368-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.11.018. PubMed PMID: 25042306.
  11. Keorochana G, Taghavi S, Lee KB, Yoo JH. Effect of sagittal alignment on kinematic changes and degree of disc degeneration in the lumbar spine: an analysis using positional MRI. Spine. 2011;36(11):893-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f4d212. PubMed PMID: 21242877.
  12. Tin ST, Woodward A, Ameratunga S. Injuries to pedal cyclists on New Zealand roads, 1988-2007. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:655. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-655.
  13. Defraeye T, Blocken B, Koninckx E, Hespel P. Aerodynamic study of different cyclist positions: CFD analysis and full-scale wind-tunnel tests. Journal of Biomechanics. 2010;43(7):1262-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.025. PubMed PMID: 20171640.
  14. McEvoy MP, Wilkie K, Williams MT. Anterior pelvic tilt in elite cyclists—A comparative matched pairs study. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2007;8(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2006.09.022.
  15. Van Hoof W, Volkaerts K, O’Sullivan K, Verschueren S. Comparing lower lumbar kinematics in cyclists with low back pain (flexion pattern) versus asymptomatic controls–field study using a wireless posture monitoring system. Manual Therapy. 2012;17(4):312-17. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.02.012. PubMed PMID: 22436688.
  16. Malisoux L, Francaux M, Theisen D. What do single-fiber studies tell us about exercise training? Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2007;39(7):1051-60. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b13e318057aeb. PubMed PMID: 17596771.
  17. Aagaard P, Anderson JL. Effects of resistance training on endurance capacity and muscle fiber composition in young top-level cyclists. Scandinavian Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):e298-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01283.x. PubMed PMID: 17596771.
  18. Livanelioglu A, Kaya F, Nabiyev V, Demirkiran G. The validity and reliability of “Spinal Mouse” assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves. European Spine Journal. 2016;25(2):476-82. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3945-7. PubMed PMID: 25900295.
  19. Barrett E, McCreesh K, Lewis J. Reliability and validity of non-radiographic methods of thoracic kyphosis measurement: a systematic review. Manual Therapy. 2014;19(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.09.003. PubMed PMID: 24246907.
  20. López-Miñarro PA, Vaquer R, Alacid F, Isorna M. Comparison of sagittal spinal curvatures and pelvic tilt in highly trained athletes from different sport disciplines. Kinesiology. 2017;49(1). doi: 10.26582/k.49.1.2.
  21. Post R, Leferink V. Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(3):187-92. doi: 10.1007/s00402-004-0641-1. PubMed PMID: 14968367.
  22. Roghani T, Khalkhalizavieh M, Talebian S, Akbarzadeh A. Back Muscle Function in Older Women With Age-Related Hyperkyphosis: A Comparative Study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019;42(4):284-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.012. PubMed PMID: 31257003.
  23. Hsu CJ, Chang YW, Chou WY, Chiou CP, Chang WN, Wong CY. Measurement of spinal range of motion in healthy individuals using an electromagnetic tracking device. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2008;8(2):135-42. doi: 10.3171/SPI/2008/8/2/135. PubMed PMID: 18248285.
  24. Wojtys EM, Ashton-Miller JA, Huston LJ. The association between athletic training time and the sagittal curvature of the immature spine. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2000;28(4):490-98. doi: 10.1177/03635465000280040801. PubMed PMID: 10921639.
  25. Katzman W, Cawthon PM, Hicks GE. Association of spinal muscle composition and prevalence of hyperkyphosis in healthy community-dwelling older men and women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;67(2):191-95. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glr160. PubMed PMID: 21878482. PubMed PMCID: PMC3297013.
  26. Ashton-Miller JA. Thoracic hyperkyphosis in the young athlete: a review of the biomechanical issues. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2004;3(1):47-52. doi: 10.1249/00149619-200402000-00009. PubMed PMID: 14728914.
  27. Aroeira RM, Estevam B, Pertence AE, Greco M, Tavares JM. Non-invasive methods of computer vision in the posture evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016;20(4):832-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.02.004. PubMed PMID: 27814864.
  28. Kado DM, Huang MH, Karlamangla AS, Cawthon P, Katzman W, Hillier TA, Ensrud K, Cummings SR. Factors associated with kyphosis progression in older women: 15 years’ experience in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(1):179-87. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1728. PubMed PMID: 22865329. PubMed PMCID: PMC3693545.
  29. Dastmanesh S, Eskandari E, Shafiee GH. Relationship Between Physical Fitness Abilities, Trunk Range of Motion and Kyphosis in Junior High School Students. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research. 2013;13(1):79-84. doi: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.13.1.6482.
  30. Hirano K, Imagama SH, Hasegawa Y. Impact of back muscle strength and aging on locomotive syndrome in community living Japanese women. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2013;75(1-2):47. PubMed PMID: 23544268. PubMed PMCID: PMC4345697.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,087
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 442


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب