LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,418,366
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,295,997
Hamzian, Nima, Afareydoon, Saeid, Ghorbani, Mahdi, Abrisham, Seyed Mohammad Jalil, Roozmand, Zahra, Abdollahi-Dehkordi, Sepideh, Sepehr Javan, Morteza, Deevband, Mohammad Reza. (1400). Equivalent Dose and Risk of Exposure Induced Cancer Death of Different Organs due to Various Image Techniques of EOS Imaging System. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(3), 289-296. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2012-1242
Nima Hamzian; Saeid Afareydoon; Mahdi Ghorbani; Seyed Mohammad Jalil Abrisham; Zahra Roozmand; Sepideh Abdollahi-Dehkordi; Morteza Sepehr Javan; Mohammad Reza Deevband. "Equivalent Dose and Risk of Exposure Induced Cancer Death of Different Organs due to Various Image Techniques of EOS Imaging System". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 3, 1400, 289-296. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2012-1242
Hamzian, Nima, Afareydoon, Saeid, Ghorbani, Mahdi, Abrisham, Seyed Mohammad Jalil, Roozmand, Zahra, Abdollahi-Dehkordi, Sepideh, Sepehr Javan, Morteza, Deevband, Mohammad Reza. (1400). 'Equivalent Dose and Risk of Exposure Induced Cancer Death of Different Organs due to Various Image Techniques of EOS Imaging System', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(3), pp. 289-296. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2012-1242
Hamzian, Nima, Afareydoon, Saeid, Ghorbani, Mahdi, Abrisham, Seyed Mohammad Jalil, Roozmand, Zahra, Abdollahi-Dehkordi, Sepideh, Sepehr Javan, Morteza, Deevband, Mohammad Reza. Equivalent Dose and Risk of Exposure Induced Cancer Death of Different Organs due to Various Image Techniques of EOS Imaging System. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1400; 11(3): 289-296. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2012-1242

Equivalent Dose and Risk of Exposure Induced Cancer Death of Different Organs due to Various Image Techniques of EOS Imaging System

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 4، دوره 11، شماره 3، شهریور 2021، صفحه 289-296    اصل مقاله (895.94 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2012-1242
نویسندگان
Nima Hamzian1؛ Saeid Afareydoon2؛ Mahdi Ghorbani* 3؛ Seyed Mohammad Jalil Abrisham4؛ Zahra Roozmand5؛ Sepideh Abdollahi-Dehkordi6؛ Morteza Sepehr Javan7؛ Mohammad Reza Deevband3
1PhD, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2MSc, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
3PhD, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4MD, Department of EOS Imaging, Shahid Sadoughi General Hospital, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
5BSc, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
6MSc, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
7BSc, Department of EOS Imaging, Shahid Sadoughi General Hospital, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
چکیده
Background: Euronext Paris Advanced Orthopedic Solutions (EOS) system is a new radiography system, capable of obtaining two-dimensional and three-dimensional images from bony structures in the body.
Objective: The aim of this study is to estimate equivalent dose and the risk of exposure induced cancer death (REID) in different organs of body due to EOS imaging system.
Material and Methods: In this experimental study, totally 120 patients were evaluated for various imaging techniques of lower limb, full spine and whole body. Equivalent dose and REID for colon, liver, lung, stomach, breast, bladder, ovary, blood cells (leukemia) and other organs were calculated using PCXMC software (version 2.0.1.2) based on Monte Carlo simulation of X-ray and human phantoms. The data on imaging technique, including age, sex, kVp, dose area product (DAP), mA, focal to detector distance were introduced as the input of PCXMC.
Results: The maximum equivalent dose (mSv) due to EOS imaging system, was estimated for the bladder 0.240±0.066 for the full body technique and 0.240±0.093 for the lower limb technique, respectively, in both males and females. The maximum organ REID (incidence per million) due to EOS imaging system was estimated for lungs as 2.59±1.0 and 2.53±0.9, for the full body technique in both males and females, respectively.
Conclusion: Generally, the equivalent dose and REID by EOS imaging system in different organs of body is low due to the low radiation dose received by the body in different techniques and views.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Radiation Dosage؛ Radiography؛ Radiation Effects؛ Risk of Exposure induced Cancer Death؛ EOS Imaging System
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Branchini M, Del Vecchio A, Gigliotti CR, Loria A, Zerbi A, Calandrino R. Organ doses and lifetime attributable risk evaluations for scoliosis examinations of adolescent patients with the EOS imaging system. Radiol Med. 2018;123(4):305-13. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0828-5. PubMed PMID: 29164365.
  2. Melhem E, Assi A, El Rachkidi R, Ghanem I. EOS(®) biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations. J Child Orthop. 2016;10(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0713-0. PubMed PMID: 26883033. PubMed PMCID: PMC4763151.
  3. Hui SCN, Chu WCW. Supplementary Addendum to “Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD “John Sevastic Award” Winner in Imaging Research”. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018;13:1. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0148-5. PubMed PMID: 29435497. PubMed PMCID: PMC5795282.
  4. Law M, Ma WK, Chan E, Lau D, Mui C, Cheung K, Yip L, Lam W. Evaluation of cumulative effective dose and cancer risk from repetitive full spine imaging using EOS system: Impact to adolescent patients of different populations. Eur J Radiol. 2017;96:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.09.006. PubMed PMID: 29103466.
  5. Pedersen PH, Petersen AG, Østgaard SE, Tvedebrink T, Eiskjær SP. EOS micro-dose protocol: first full-spine radiation dose measurements in anthropomorphic phantoms and comparisons with EOS standard-dose and conventional digital radiology. Spine. 2018;43(22):E1313-21. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002696. PubMed PMID: 30383725.
  6. Chiron P, Demoulin L, Wytrykowski K, Cavaignac E, Reina N, Murgier J. Radiation dose and magnification in pelvic X-ray: EOS™ imaging system versus plain radiographs. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(8):1155-59. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.07.018. PubMed PMID: 28942025.
  7. Ben Abdennebi A, Aubry S, Ounalli L, Fayache MS, Delabrousse E, Petegnief Y. Comparative dose levels between CT-scanner and slot-scanning device (EOS system) in pregnant women pelvimetry. Phys Med. 2017;33:77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.008. PubMed PMID: 27993442.
  8. Yvert M, Diallo A, Bessou P, Rehel JL, Lhomme E, Chateil JF. Radiography of scoliosis: Comparative dose levels and image quality between a dynamic flat-panel detector and a slot-scanning device (EOS system). DiagnInterv Imaging. 2015;96(11):1177-88. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.06.018. PubMed PMID: 26282052.
  9. Delin C, Silvera S, Bassinet C, Thelen P, Rehel JL, Legmann P, Folinais D. Ionizing radiation doses during lower limb torsion and anteversion measurements by EOS stereoradiography and computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(2):371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.026. PubMed PMID: 24291000.
  10. Abrisham SMJ, Bouzarjomehri F, Nafisi-Moghadam R, Sobhan MR, Gadimi M, Omidvar F. A comparison of patients absorption doses with bone deformity due to the EOS imaging and digital radiology. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017;5(3):145-48. PubMed PMID: 28656161. PubMed PMCID: PMC5466858.
  11. Tapiovaara M, Siiskonen T. PCXMC, A Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations. Report STUK-A139; Helsinki, Finland: Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority; 2008.
  12. ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. PubMed PMID: 18082557.
  13. Alrehily F, Hogg P, Twiste M, Johansen S, Tootell A. Scoliosis imaging: An analysis of radiation risk in the CT scan projection radiograph and a comparison with projection radiography and EOS. Radiography. 2019;25(3)68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.02.005. PubMed PMID: 31301794.
  14. Escott BG, Ravi B, Weathermon AC, Acharya J, Gordon CL, Babyn PS, et al. EOS low-dose radiography: a reliable and accurate upright assessment of lower-limb lengths. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2013;95(23) e1831-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00989. PubMed PMID: 24306706.
  15. Hui SCN, Pialasse JP, Wong JYH, Lam T, Ng BKW, Cheng JCY, et al. Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD “John Sevastic Award” Winner in Imaging Research. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016;11:46. doi: 10.1186/s13013-016-0106-7. PMCID: PMC5198497. PubMed PMID: 28035336.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,035
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 475


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب