LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,113
تعداد مقالات10,208
تعداد مشاهده مقاله40,780,191
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله8,803,962
Pakniyat, Fatemeh, Mozdarani, Hossein, Nedaee, Hassan Ali, Mahmoudzadeh, Aziz, Salimi, Mahdieh, Gholami, Somayeh. (1401). Bystander Response Following High-Dose X-irradiation; Time-dependent Nature of GammaH2AX Foci and Cell Death Consequences. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(1), 17-28. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1053
Fatemeh Pakniyat; Hossein Mozdarani; Hassan Ali Nedaee; Aziz Mahmoudzadeh; Mahdieh Salimi; Somayeh Gholami. "Bystander Response Following High-Dose X-irradiation; Time-dependent Nature of GammaH2AX Foci and Cell Death Consequences". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 1, 1401, 17-28. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1053
Pakniyat, Fatemeh, Mozdarani, Hossein, Nedaee, Hassan Ali, Mahmoudzadeh, Aziz, Salimi, Mahdieh, Gholami, Somayeh. (1401). 'Bystander Response Following High-Dose X-irradiation; Time-dependent Nature of GammaH2AX Foci and Cell Death Consequences', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(1), pp. 17-28. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1053
Pakniyat, Fatemeh, Mozdarani, Hossein, Nedaee, Hassan Ali, Mahmoudzadeh, Aziz, Salimi, Mahdieh, Gholami, Somayeh. Bystander Response Following High-Dose X-irradiation; Time-dependent Nature of GammaH2AX Foci and Cell Death Consequences. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 13(1): 17-28. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1053

Bystander Response Following High-Dose X-irradiation; Time-dependent Nature of GammaH2AX Foci and Cell Death Consequences

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 3، دوره 13، شماره 1، فروردین و اردیبهشت 2023، صفحه 17-28    اصل مقاله (3.15 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1053
نویسندگان
Fatemeh Pakniyat1؛ Hossein Mozdarani* 2؛ Hassan Ali Nedaee1، 3؛ Aziz Mahmoudzadeh4؛ Mahdieh Salimi5؛ Somayeh Gholami3
1Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Malek-Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
5Department of Medical Genetics, Medical Biotechnology Institute, National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background: The paradigm shifts in target theory could be defined as the radiation-triggered bystander response in which the radiation deleterious effects occurred in the adjacent cells. 
Objective: This study aims to assess bystander response in terms of DNA damage and their possible cell death consequences following high-dose radiotherapy. Temporal characteristics of gH2AX foci as a manifestation of DNA damage were also evaluated.
Material and Methods: In this experimental study, bystander response was investigated in human carcinoma cells of HeLa and HN5, neighboring those that received high doses. Medium transfer was performed from 10 Gy-irradiated donors to 1.5 Gy-irradiated recipients. GammaH2AX foci, clonogenic and apoptosis assays were investigated. The gH2AX foci time-point study was implemented 1, 4, and 24 h after the medium exchange. 
Results: DNA damage was enhanced in HeLa and HN5 bystander cells with the ratio of 1.27 and 1.72, respectively, which terminated in more than two-fold clonogenic survival decrease, along with gradual apoptosis increase. GammH2AX foci temporal characterization revealed maximum foci scoring at the 1 h time-point in HeLa, and also 4 h in HN5, which remained even 24 h after the medium sharing in higher level than the control group.  
Conclusion: The time-dependent nature of bystander-induced gH2AX foci as a DNA damage surrogate marker was highlighted with the persistent foci at 24 h. considering an outcome of bystander-induced DNA damage, predominant role of clonogenic cell death was also elicited compared to apoptosis. Moreover, the role of high-dose bystander response observed in the current work clarified bystander potential implications in radiotherapy.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Bystander؛ High-Dose؛ GammaH2AX؛ DNA Damage؛ Survival؛ Apoptosis
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Nagasawa H, Little JB. Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of α-particles. Cancer Research. 1992;52(22):6394-6. PubMed PMID: 1423287.
  2. Morgan WF. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro. Radiation Research. 2003;159(5):567-80. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0567:NADEOE]2.0.CO;2. PubMed PMID: 12710868.
  3. Morgan WF. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: II. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vivo, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effects. Radiation Research. 2003;159(5):581-96. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0581:NADEOE]2.0.CO;2. PubMed PMID: 12710869.
  4. Buonanno M, De Toledo SM, Pain D, Azzam EI. Long-term consequences of radiation-induced bystander effects depend on radiation quality and dose and correlate with oxidative stress. Radiation Research. 2011;175(4):405-15. doi: 10.1667/RR2461.1. PubMed PMID: 21319986. PubMed PMCID: PMC3106980.
  5. Mothersill C, Seymour CB. Bystander and delayed effects after fractionated radiation exposure. Radiation Research. 2002;158(5):626-33. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2002)158[0626:BADEAF]2.0.CO;2. PubMed PMID: 12385640.
  6. Maguire P, Mothersill C, Seymour C, Lyng FM. Medium from irradiated cells induces dose-dependent mitochondrial changes and BCL2 responses in unirradiated human keratinocytes. Radiation Research. 2005;163(4):384-90. doi: 10.1667/rr3325. PubMed PMID: 15799693.
  7. Blyth BJ, Sykes PJ. Radiation-induced bystander effects: what are they, and how relevant are they to human radiation exposures? Radiation Research. 2011;176(2):139-57. doi: 10.1667/rr2548.1. PubMed PMID: 21631286.
  8. Mothersill C, Seymour C. Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 1997;71(4):421-7. doi: 10.1080/095530097144030. PubMed PMID: 9154145.
  9. Azzam EI, De Toledo SM, Little JB. Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from α-particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(2):473-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.473. PubMed PMID: 11149936. PubMed PMCID: PMC14611.
  10. Karagiannis TC, El-Osta A. DNA damage repair and transcription: Double-strand breaks: signaling pathways and repair mechanisms. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61(17):2137-47. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4174-0. PubMed PMID: 15338043.
  11. Little JB, Nagasawa H, Li GC, Chen DJ. Involvement of the nonhomologous end joining DNA repair pathway in the bystander effect for chromosomal aberrations. Radiation Research. 2003;159(2):262-7. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0262:IOTNEJ]2.0.CO;2. PubMed PMID: 12537532.
  12. Nagasawa H, Huo L, Little JB. Increased bystander mutagenic effect in DNA double-strand break repair-deficient mammalian cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 2003;79(1):35-41. PubMed PMID: 12556329.
  13. Yang H, Asaad N, Held KD. Medium-mediated intercellular communication is involved in bystander responses of X-ray-irradiated normal human fibroblasts. Oncogene. 2005;24(12):2096-103. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208439. PubMed PMID: 15688009.
  14. Hill MA, Ford JR, Clapham P, Marsden SJ, Stevens DL, Townsend KM, Goodhead DT. Bound PCNA in nuclei of primary rat tracheal epithelial cells after exposure to very low doses of plutonium-238 α particles. Radiat Res. 2005;163(1):36-44. doi: 10.1667/RR3282. PubMed PMID: 15606305.
  15. Kashino G, Suzuki K, Matsuda N, Kodama S, Ono K, Watanabe M, Prise KM. Radiation induced bystander signals are independent of DNA damage and DNA repair capacity of the irradiated cells. Mutat Res. 2007;619(1-2):134-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.02.005. PubMed PMID: 17395217. PubMed PMCID: PMC3004241.
  16. Prise KM, Folkard M, Kuosaite V, Tartier L, Zyuzikov N, Shao C. What role for DNA damage and repair in the bystander response? Mutat Res. 2006;597(1-2):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.06.034. PubMed PMID: 16414091.
  17. Mah LJ, El-Osta A, Karagiannis TC. γH2AX: a sensitive molecular marker of DNA damage and repair. Leukemia. 2010;24(4):679-86. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.6. PubMed PMID: 20130602.
  18. Sokolov MV, Smilenov LB, Hall EJ, Panyutin IG, Bonner WM, Sedelnikova OA. Ionizing radiation induces DNA double-strand breaks in bystander primary human fibroblasts. Oncogene. 2005;24(49):7257-65. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208886. PubMed PMID: 16170376.
  19. Hu B, Han W, Wu L, Feng H, Liu X, Zhang L, et al. In situ visualization of DSBs to assess the extranuclear/extracellular effects induced by low-dose α-particle irradiation. Radiation Research. 2005;164(3):286-91. doi: 10.1667/RR3415.1.
  20. Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WM. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J Cell Biol. 1999;146(5):905-16. doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.5.905. PubMed PMID: 10477747. PubMed PMCID: PMC2169482.
  21. Hu B, Wu L, Han W, Zhang L, Chen S, Xu A, et al. The time and spatial effects of bystander response in mammalian cells induced by low dose radiation. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27(2):245-51. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi224. PubMed PMID: 16150894.
  22. Yang H, Anzenberg V, Held KD. The time dependence of bystander responses induced by iron-ion radiation in normal human skin fibroblasts. Radiat Res. 2007;168(3):292-8. doi: 10.1667/RR0864.1. PubMed PMID: 17705636.
  23. Han W, Wu L, Hu B, Zhang L, Chen S, Bao L, et al. The early and initiation processes of radiation-induced bystander effects involved in the induction of DNA double strand breaks in non-irradiated cultures. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(Spec No 1):S7-12. doi: 10.1259/bjr/44550200. PubMed PMID: 17704329.
  24. Desouky O, Ding N, Zhou G. Targeted and non-targeted effects of ionizing radiation. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 2015;8(2):247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2015.03.003.
  25. Turesson I, Carlsson J, Brahme A, Glimelius B, Zackrisson B, et al. Biological response to radiation therapy. Acta Oncol. 2003;42(2):92-106. doi: 10.1080/02841860310004959. . PubMed PMID: 12801128.
  26. Prasanna A, Ahmed MM, Mohiuddin M, Coleman CN. Exploiting sensitization windows of opportunity in hyper and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(4):287. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.01.14. PubMed PMID: 24688774. PubMed PMCID: PMC3968552.
  27. Balcer-Kubiczek EK. Apoptosis in radiation therapy: a double-edged sword. Exp Oncol. 2012;34(3):277-85. PubMed PMID: 23070013.
  28. Billena C, Khan AJ. A Current Review of Spatial Fractionation: Back to the Future? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;104(1):177-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.073. PubMed PMID: 30684666. PubMed PMCID: PMC7443362.
  29. Gholami S, Nedaie HA, Longo F, Ay MR, Dini SA, Meigooni AS. Grid Block Design Based on Monte Carlo Simulated Dosimetry, the Linear Quadratic and Hug-Kellerer Radiobiological Models. J Med Phys. 2017;42(4):213-21. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_38_17. PubMed PMID: 29296035. PubMed PMCID: PMC5744449.
  30. Zhang D, Zhou T, He F, Rong Y, Lee SH, Wu S, Zuo L. Reactive oxygen species formation and bystander effects in gradient irradiation on human breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7(27):41622-36. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9517. PubMed PMID: 27223435. PubMed PMCID: PMC5173083.
  31. Mah LJ, El-Osta A, Karagiannis TC. GammaH2AX as a molecular marker of aging and disease. Epigenetics. 2010;5(2):129-36. doi: 10.4161/epi.5.2.11080. PubMed PMID: 20150765.
  32. Sedelnikova OA, Nakamura A, Kovalchuk O, Koturbash I, Mitchell SA, Marino SA, Brenner DJ, Bonner WM. DNA double-strand breaks form in bystander cells after microbeam irradiation of three-dimensional human tissue models. Cancer Res. 2007;67(9):4295-302. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4442. PubMed PMID: 17483342.
  33. Rothkamm K, Horn S. gamma-H2AX as protein biomarker for radiation exposure. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2009;45(3):265-71. PubMed PMID: 19861731.
  34. Costes SV, Chiolo I, Pluth JM, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Jakob B. Spatiotemporal characterization of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage foci and their relation to chromatin organization. Mutat Res. 2010;704(1-3):78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.12.006. PubMed PMID: 20060491. PubMed PMCID: PMC3951968.
  35. Rothkamm K, Barnard S, Moquet J, Ellender M, Rana Z, Burdak-Rothkamm S. DNA damage foci: Meaning and significance. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 2015;56(6):491-504. doi: 10.1002/em.21944. PubMed PMID: 25773265.
  36. Salimi M, Mozdarani H. [gamma]-H2AX as a protein biomarker for radiation exposure response in ductal carcinoma breast tumors: Experimental evidence and literature review. International Journal of Radiation Research. 2014;12(1):1.
  37. Prise KM, Schettino G, Folkard M, Held KD. New insights on cell death from radiation exposure. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):520-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70246-1. PubMed PMID: 15992701.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 21,317
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 392


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب