پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,089 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,995 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 26,377,782 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,278,521 |
A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, Race and Protaper Rotary Systems | ||
| Journal of Dentistry | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 22، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 72، آذر 2021، صفحه 193-197 اصل مقاله (350.76 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2020.84776.1100 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammadreza Nabavizadeh1؛ Mohammad Mehdi Shokouhi* 2؛ Mojgan Kheirandish3؛ Safoora Sahebi2؛ Nooshin Sadatshojaee2؛ Abbas Abbaszadegan2 | ||
| 1Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 2Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| 3Dental Student, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Statement of the Problem: One of the annoying problems related to almost all root canal preparation systems, which may cause flare-ups and impairment in the healing process is the extrusion of intracanal debris. Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the amount of apically-extruded debris during root canal preparation using Medin (MEDIN Co., Czech Republic) rotary system compared with two common rotary systems, including Protaper (Dentsply Maillefer., Switzerland) and RaCe (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland). Materials and Method: Sixty mandibular premolars with single canal were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20). The root canals were prepared with Medin, Protaper and RaCe rotary instruments based on their manufacturers’ instructions. The debris were collected into pre-weighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the pretreatment weight of the vials. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test at a 5% significance level. Results: Medin instrument caused significantly less debris extrusion in comparison with Protaper and Race (p < 0.05). The differences between the Protaper and Race rotary systems were not statistically significant (p = 0.752). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Medin rotary system produced less apical extrusion than Protaper and Race. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Apical extrusion؛ Debris؛ Endodontic treatment؛ Rotary file | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Gavini G, Santos Md, Caldeira CL, Machado MEdL, Freire LG, Iglecias EF, et al. Nickel–titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art. Braz Oral Res. 2018; 32(suppl 1): e67.
[2] Tanalp J, Güngör T. Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2014; 47: 211-221.
[3] Holland R, De*Souza V, Nery M, De*Mello W, Bernabé P, Otoboni*Filho J. Tissue reactions following apical plugging of the root canal with infected dentin chips: a histologic study in dogs' teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho. 1980; 49: 366-369.
[4] Bidar M, Moradi S, Forghani M, Bidad S, Azghadi M, Rezvani S, et al. Microscopic evaluation of cleaning efficiency of three different Nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Iran Endo J. 2010; 5: 174.
[5] Moradi S, Talati A, Zadeh AM. Centering ability and dentin removal of rotary systems in curved root canals. Iran Endo J. 2009; 4: 91.
[6] Talati A, Moradi S, Forghani M, Monajemzadeh A. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in curved root canals. Iran Endo J. 2013; 8: 55.
[7] Azar NG, Ebrahimi G. Apically‐extruded debris using the ProTaper system. Aust Endo J. 2005; 31: 21-23.
[8] Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive and HyFlex instruments. Iran Endo J. 2014; 40: 1638-1641.
[9] Garlapati R, Venigalla BS, Patil JD, Raju R, Rammohan C. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using K3, Mtwo, RaCe and protaper rotary systems: An in vitro study. J Conser Dent (JCD). 2013; 16: 300.
[10] Tasdemir T, Er K, Çelik D, Aydemir H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris using three rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Dent Scien. 2010; 5: 121-125.
[11] Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endo. 1991; 17: 275-279.
[12] Tanalp J, Kaptan F, Sert S, Kayahan B, Bayirl G. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho Oral Radio Endod. 2006; 101: 250-257.
[13] Kustarci A, Akdemir N, Siso SH, Altunbas D. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris using two engine driven and step-back instrumentation techniques: an in-vitro study. Euro J Dent. 2008; 2: 233.
[14] Soi S, Yadav S, Sharma S, Sharma M. In vitro comparison of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation of mandibular premolars with manual and rotary instruments. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Pros. 2015; 9: 131.
[15] Altundasar E, Nagas E, Uyanik O, Serper A. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho Oral Radio Endod. 2011; 112: e31-e35.
[16] Rzhanov EA, Belyaeva TS. Design features of rotary root canal instruments. Endo Pract Today. 2012; 6: 29-39.
[17] Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Critical evaluation of root canal transportation by instrumentation. Endo Top. 2013; 29: 110-124.
[18] Elmsallati EA, Wadachi R, Suda H. Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel‐titanium files with different pitch: a pilot study. Aust Endo J. 2009; 35: 65-69.
[19] VandeVisse JE, Brilliant JD. Effect of irrigation on the production of extruded material at the root apex during instrumentation. J Endo. 1975; 1: 243-246.
[20] Fairbourn DR, McWalter GM, Montgomery S. The effect of four preparation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris. J Endo. 1987; 13: 102-108.
[21] Gkampesi S, Mylona Z, Zarra T, Lambrianidis T. Assessment of apical extrusion of debris during endodontic retreatment with 3 rotary nickel-titanium retreatment systems and hand files. Balkan J Dent Med. 2016; 20: 22-28.
[22] Verma M, Meena N, Kumari RA, Mallandur S, Vikram R, Gowda V. Comparison of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using instrumentation techniques with two operating principles: An in vitro study. J Conser Dent (JCD). 2017; 20: 96. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,931 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,149 |
||
