پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,093 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,030 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 27,417,527 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,569,890 |
Comparative Outcomes Analysis of Single-Port versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Colon Cancer | ||
| Iranian Journal of Colorectal Research | ||
| دوره 6، Issues 2-3، شهریور 2018، صفحه 1-6 اصل مقاله (117.9 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research/Original Article | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Seyed Vahid Hosseini1؛ Mohammed Abdzaid Akool2؛ Mozhdeh Zamani* 1 | ||
| 1Colorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jabir Ibn Hayyan Medical University, Najaf, Iraq | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: In recent years, single-port laparoscopic colectomy (SPLC) has been introduced as a new technique for colorectal surgery. Despite several studies, available results are too sparse to accurately identify differences between SPLC and conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC). In a continuing effort, the aim of this study was to compare these two techniques in colon cancer patients. Methods: 76 patients with colon cancer who underwent either SPLC or MPLC took part in this study. Demographic data and complications such as age, gender, operative time, hospital stay, intra-operative blood volume loss, and internal organ injury were assessed. The patients were followed up for 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS software using Student’s t-test, Chi-square test, or Fisher’s exact test. Results: The complications were similar in both SPLC and MPLC groups. Operative time was significantly lower in SPLC (P = 0.003). No significant differences were observed in other factors (P > 0.05). Conclusions: According to studies conducted so far, it seems that the difference in the surgeon’s experience, types of the colorectal diseases, and types of the colorectal resection may affect the outcomes like operative time and hospital stay. Therefore, further coherent investigations with larger datasets are essential for a detailed comparison. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Colon Cancer؛ Single-Port Laparoscopy؛ Multiport Laparoscopy؛ Hemicolectomy | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Kim SJ, Choi BJ, Lee SC. Comparative analysis of outcomes after multiport and single-port laparoscopic colectomy in emergency situations: Is single-port laparoscopic colectomy safe and feasible? Asian J Surg. 2018;41(1):20–9. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.008. [PubMed: 27592126].
2. Ghahramani L, Eghlimi H, Bananzadeh A, Hosseini SV, Izadpanah A, Safarpour AR, et al. Evaluating the Efficacy of Open Versus Laparoscopic Abdominoperianal Resection in Management of Patients with Low Rectal Cancer. Ann Colorec Res. 2015;2(3).
3. Ghaem H, Amiri Z, Kianpour F, Rezaianzadeh A, Hosseini SV, Khazraei H. Comparing Recurrence and Complications After Laparoscopy and Laparotomy Surgery among Patients Suffering from Colorectal Cancer, Shiraz, Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(7):3111–6. [PubMed: 27509938].
4. Brockhaus AC, Sauerland S, Saad S. Single-incision versus standard multi-incision laparoscopic colectomy in patients with malignant or benign colonic disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and assessment of the evidence. BMC Surg. 2016;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016- 0187-5. [PubMed: 27756272]. [PubMed Central: PMC5070079].
5. Akshay K, Sameer R. Single Incision Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) with Conventional Instruments: A Single Centre Experience. J Dent Med Sci. 2016;1(15):112–5. doi: 10.9790/0853-15071112115.
6. Chen WT, Chang SC, Chiang HC, Lo WY, Jeng LB, Wu C, et al. Singleincision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(6):1887–92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1481-4. [PubMed: 21359907].
7. Hosseini SV, Solhjou Z, Pourahmad S, Rahimikazerooni S, Gabash KM, Bagherpourjahromi A, et al. The early outcome of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Adv biomed res. 2015;4.
8. Barbaros U, Dinccag A. Single incision laparoscopic splenectomy: the first two cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(8):1520–3. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0869-8. [PubMed: 19365695].
9. Raman JD, Cadeddu JA, Rao P, Rane A. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: initial urological experience and comparison with naturalorifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. BJU Int. 2008;101(12):1493–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07586.x. [PubMed: 18325059].
10. Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginesta C, Benarroch G, Garcia-Valdecasas JC. [Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILS): Initial experience]. Cir Esp. 2009;85(5):317–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2009.01.003. [PubMed: 19286170].
11. Hosseini SV, Hosseini SA, Al-Hurry A, Khazraei H, Ganji F, Sadeghi F. Comparison of Early Results and Complications between Multiand Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Clinical Study. Iran J Med Sci. 2017;42(3):251–7. [PubMed: 28533573]. [PubMed Central: PMC5429493].
12. Saber AA, Elgamal MH, Itawi EA, Rao AJ. Single incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS): a novel technique. Obes Surg. 2008;18(10):1338–42. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9646-0. [PubMed: 18688685].
13. Ahmed K, Wang TT, Patel VM, Nagpal K, Clark J, Ali M, et al. The role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):378–96. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1208-6. [PubMed: 20623239].
14. Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(8):823–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463- 1318.2008.01660.x. [PubMed: 18684153].
15. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(10):1013–6. doi: 10.1007/s00384- 008-0519-8. [PubMed: 18607608].
16. Vilcea I, Maggiori L, Burcos T, Panis Y. Single Port Right Colectomy: Surgical Technique. Chirurgia Bucharest. 2016;111(4):358–64.
17. Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(11):1549–54. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e85875. [PubMed: 20940605].
18. Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(1):72–80. discussion 80-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.010. [PubMed: 21420878].
19. Kim SJ, Ryu GO, Choi BJ, Kim JG, Lee KJ, Lee SC, et al. The shortterm outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):933–40. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318237826b. [PubMed: 22107740].
20. Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, Nagle DA, YoungFadok TM, Lee EC, et al. Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):66–9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182378442. [PubMed: 22104563].
21. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Mereu A, Binda B, Brachini G, et al. Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study. Am J Surg. 2012;204(1):115–20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.005. [PubMed: 22178484].
22. Madhoun N, Keller DS, Haas EM. Review of single incision laparoscopic surgery in colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(38):10824–9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10824. [PubMed: 26478673]. [PubMed Central: PMC4600583].
23. Vasilakis V, Clark CE, Liasis L, Papaconstantinou HT. Noncosmetic benefits of single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a case-matched comparison with multiport laparoscopic technique. J Surg Res. 2013;180(2):201–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.063. [PubMed: 22626560].
24. Chambers WM, Bicsak M, Lamparelli M, Dixon AR. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in complex colorectal surgery: a technique offering potential and not just cosmesis. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(4):393– 8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02158.x. [PubMed: 20002691].
25. Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2729–34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2262-z. [PubMed: 22538676].
26. Bulut O, Nielsen CB, Jespersen N. Single-port access laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: initial experience with 10 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(7):803–9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182147b4d. [PubMed: 21654246].
27. Gaujoux S, Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Ferron M, Panis Y. Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of single port access colorectal surgery: a single institutional case-matched study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(3):629–34. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1780-7. [PubMed: 22125169].
28. Champagne BJ, Lee EC, Leblanc F, Stein SL, Delaney CP. Singleincision vs straight laparoscopic segmental colectomy: a case-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(2):183–6. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fd48af. [PubMed: 21228666].
29. Waters JA, Guzman MJ, Fajardo AD, Selzer DJ, Wiebke EA, Robb BW, et al. Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(11):1467–72. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f23ca0. [PubMed: 20940593].
30. Fung AK, Aly EH. Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1353–64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8834. [PubMed: 22961513]. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 165 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 111 |
||