تعداد نشریات | 20 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,149 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,415,520 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,291,328 |
Evaluation of the Realization of the Management and Leadership Axis in the National Accreditation Standards Program in Shiraz Hospitals, Iran, 2017 | ||
Health Management & Information Science | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 7، شماره 3، مهر 2020، صفحه 142-148 اصل مقاله (324.34 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Seyedmojtaba Pishva* 1؛ Moghaddeseh Mohammadian2؛ Parvin ghiasy3؛ ebrahim beiraghipanah4 | ||
11. Excutive master of Business Administration (EMBA), Department of Management, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch, Shiraz, Iran 2. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
2Department of management, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch, Shiraz, Iran | ||
3Chief of accreditation office, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
4Young and Elite Researchers Club,Islamic Azad University, Kish Branch,Kish Iland. | ||
چکیده | ||
Introduction: Accreditation is one of the standard assessment systems in hospitals used for its importance, efficiency, and critical role in improving health care services. According to the statistics, one of the primary accreditation axes is the management and leadership axis. Considering the close relationship between management and clinical issues in hospitals. This study aims to evaluate the realization of the management and leadership unit in Shiraz hospitals. Method: The research population in this applied field study includes 33 public and private hospitals in Shiraz (i.e., charitable, military, and affiliated hospitals). According to the Ministry of Health's announced checklist, all data was gathered from the hospital accreditation program during 2017 (the latest overall accreditation) completed by trained assessors. The accreditation certificate was issued. All data regarding Shiraz hospitals were collected from the accreditation portfolio of hospitals after obtaining the necessary permits. Data was analyzed in inferential levels using SPSS25 software. Results: The study results demonstrated that the average percentage of realization of the sub-axes of the governing team, executive management team, quality improvement, error management, disaster risk, and human resources management in public hospitals were higher than those of private and affiliated ones. The average percentage of realization of the sub-axes of supply and accommodation management and food management increased in private hospitals than those of the public ones. Conclusion: The results showed that the average achievement percentage of six sub-axes was higher in public hospitals than the private and affiliated ones. Therefore, it reveals that public hospitals have paid more attention to infrastructural issues while working on the leadership axis than the other hospital types. The higher achievement percentage is necessary to deliver better service to patients. The public hospitals manifested a better performance in meeting the standards of this axis. The study conducted on these criteria showed that infrastructural issues had been paid more attention while being developed. Meanwhile, it is also required to pay more attention to the promotion of the processes as well as infrastructural matters to improve the level of safety and the services provided to patients | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
National Accreditation؛ Management؛ and Leadership axes؛ Hospital quality management | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Baker SL, Beitsch L, Landrum LB, Head R. The role of performance management and quality improvement in a national voluntary public health accreditation system. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007;13(4):427-9. doi: 10.1097/01. PHH.0000278039.46518.45.
2. Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20(3):172 83. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn005. 3. Organization WH. Guidelines for safe recreational water environments: Coastal and fresh waters. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. 4. Buetow SA, Wellingham J. Accreditation of general practices: challenges and lessons. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(2):129-35. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.129. 5. Mosadeghrad AM, Akbari-sari A, Yousefinezhadi T. Evaluation of hospital accreditation standards. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017;23(153):43-54. 6. Greenfield D, Pawsey M, Hinchcliff R, Moldovan M, Braithwaite J. The standard of healthcare accreditation standards: a review of empirical research underpinning their development and impact. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:329. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12 329. 7. Verstraete A, van Boeckel E, Thys M, Engelen F. Attitude of laboratory personnel towards accreditation. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 1998;11(1):27-30. doi: 10.1108/09526869810199629. 8. Chen J, Rathore SS, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. JCAHO accreditation and quality of care for acute myocardial infarction. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22(2):243-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.243. 9. Mosadeghrad AM, Akbari-sari A, Yousefinezhadi T. Evaluation of hospital accreditation standards. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017;23(153):43-54. 10. Peter TF, Rotz PD, Blair DH, Khine AA, Freeman RR, Murtagh MM. Impact of laboratory accreditation on patient care and the health system. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134(4):550-5. doi: 10.1309/AJCPH1SKQ1HNWGHF. 11. Mate KS, Rooney AL, Supachutikul A, Gyani G. Accreditation as a path to achieving universal quality health coverage. Global Health. 2014;10:68. doi: 10.1186/s12992-014-0068-6. 12. Pomey MP, Contandriopoulos AP, Francois P, Bertrand D. Accreditation: a tool for organizational change in hospitals? Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2004;17(2-3):113-24. doi: 10.1108/09526860410532757. 13. Tofighi S, Fallah MS, Khajehazad M. Quality evaluation of educational leadership in Baqiyatallah Hospital using Baldrige Excellence Model (2010). The Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. 2012;16(2):65-70. 14. Ministry of Health &Medical Education. A look at hospital accreditation standards, Seda publishing company. Tehran, Iran; 2008. [Persian] 15. Rooney AL, Van Ostenberg PR. Licensure, accreditation, and certification: approaches to health services quality: Citeseer; 1999. 16. Donahue KT, vanOstenberg P. Joint Commission International accreditation: relationship to four models of evaluation. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12(3):243-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.3.243. 17. Ministary of health and treatment. National accreditation standards of Iranian Hospitals. The New Generation. 2016. 18. Nekoei-Moghadam M, Amiresmaili M, Iranemansh M, Iranmanesh M. Hospital accreditation in Iran: A qualitative case study of Kerman hospitals. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018;33(2):426-33. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2480. 19. Bohigas L, Asenjo MA. Hospital accreditation in Catalunya: an assessment of the performance in quality of hospitals. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1995;10(3):201-8. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740100306. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,636 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 737 |