LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,485
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,272
Erfanian Arghavanian, Fatemeh, Heydari, Abbas, Noghani Dokht Bahmani, Mohsen, Latifnejad Roudsari, Robab. (1399). An Ethno-phenomenological Study of Pregnant Women’s Experiences regarding Household Roles. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 8(4), 282-294. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.84685.1228
Fatemeh Erfanian Arghavanian; Abbas Heydari; Mohsen Noghani Dokht Bahmani; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari. "An Ethno-phenomenological Study of Pregnant Women’s Experiences regarding Household Roles". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 8, 4, 1399, 282-294. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.84685.1228
Erfanian Arghavanian, Fatemeh, Heydari, Abbas, Noghani Dokht Bahmani, Mohsen, Latifnejad Roudsari, Robab. (1399). 'An Ethno-phenomenological Study of Pregnant Women’s Experiences regarding Household Roles', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 8(4), pp. 282-294. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.84685.1228
Erfanian Arghavanian, Fatemeh, Heydari, Abbas, Noghani Dokht Bahmani, Mohsen, Latifnejad Roudsari, Robab. An Ethno-phenomenological Study of Pregnant Women’s Experiences regarding Household Roles. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1399; 8(4): 282-294. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.84685.1228

An Ethno-phenomenological Study of Pregnant Women’s Experiences regarding Household Roles

International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery
مقاله 1، دوره 8، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 32، دی 2020، صفحه 282-294    اصل مقاله (432.57 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.84685.1228
نویسندگان
Fatemeh Erfanian Arghavanian1، 2؛ Abbas Heydari1؛ Mohsen Noghani Dokht Bahmani3؛ Robab Latifnejad Roudsari* 1، 2
1Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran;
2Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran;
3Department of Social Sciences, School of Literature and Humanity, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran;
چکیده
Background: Household labor has been indicated as a feminine role even in the present millennium, in which gender role orientations have been changed. As pregnancy is an important time for studying the division of household labor, this study aimed to discover the meaning of the pregnant women’s experiences of household roles.
Methods: An ethno-phenomenological study, in which van Manen approach to phenomenology was its core and focused ethnographic approach was its supplementary component, was used to conduct this study. 25 pregnant women with maximum variation were recruited via the purposeful sampling during 2016-2017 in Mashhad, Iran. In-depth semi-structured interviews, vignette interviews as well as observations were used for data collection. Six-step van Manen’s descriptive-interpretive phenomenological approach was used for concurrent data collection and analysis. MAXQDA, version 10, was used for data organization.
Results: Data analysis led to the emergence of an overarching theme entitled: “couples’ preservation, keeping up and protection of the household roles”. This was derived from two subthemes including the mother’s efforts to play the household roles and spouse confrontation with the household chores.
Conclusion: The consequence of all endeavors of pregnant women along with their husbands develops the experience of preserving and maintaining the importance of household roles. As pregnancy is an important period for considering division of household responsibilities, it is necessary to design and implement gender sensitive programs to empower pregnant women and their families as well.
 
کلیدواژه‌ها
Experience؛ Household؛ Pregnant women-women’s role
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Khamseh A. Gender Roles Patterning and Cultural Stereotypes in Girl Students. Women’s Studies (Sociological & Psychological). 2005;2:115-34. [In Persian]
  2. Safiri K, Zare Z. Feeling incoherence between social and family roles in women. Women’s Studies (Sociological & Psychological). 2006;4:47-70. [In Persian]
  3. Gochman DS. Handbook of Health Behavior Research II: Provider Determinants. 1st ed. US: Springer; 1997.
  4. Bem SL. The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1974;42:155-62.
  5. Brannon L. Gender: Psychological Perspectives. 7th ed. US: Routledge; 2016.
  6. Abolqsemi A, Sheybani H, Narimani M, Ganji M. Relationship of Androgyny and Neuroticism with Quality of Life in Infertile and Fertile Women. Women’s Studies (Sociological & Psychological). 2008;6:47-61. [In Persian]
  7. Davoodi M. Study the value of homework. Tehran: Ministry of Science, Research and Technology; 2017. [Cited 2 August 2020]. http://www.ararc.ir/sites/default/files/%D9%85%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%87%20%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B2%D8%B4%20%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%20%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86%DA%AF%DB%8C.pdf
  8. Barati SH, Moradkhani M, Enayat H. The division of gender labor from the perspective of Islam. The Islamic Journal of Women and the Family. 2014;2:139-54. [In Persian]
  9. Serajzadeh H, Javaheri F. Gender Egalitarian Attitude Among University Students and Its Related Contextual and Attitudinal Variables. Iranian Journal of Sociology. 2006;7:3-40. [In Persian]
  10. Ehteshamzadeh P. Women’s Gender Role Development And Family Sanity. Woman and Culture. 2010;1:51-65. [In Persian]
  11. Nitsche N, Grunow D. Housework over the course of relationships: Gender ideology, resources, and the division of housework from a growth curve perspective. Advances in Life Course Research. 2016;29:80-94.
  12. Rezvani M, Zanjanizadeh H. A Study on Factors Affecting Division of Labor in Family (Case Study of Married Female Working for Ministry of Education in Mashhad). Women Studies (Sociological and Psychological). 2016;13:29-60. [In Persian]
  13. Maaref M, Khalili S, Hejazi E, Lavasani MG. The Relationship between Identity Style, Gender Role and Marital Satisfaction in Married Couples. Journal of Psychology. 2015;18:365-80. [In Persian]
  14. Bostan H. A Review of Gender roles` theories. Women in Development & Politics. 2006;4:5-31. [In Persian]
  15. Eftekhar H, Montazeri A, Nikbakht Nasrabadi A, et al. Gender-based sexual roles: A mixed methods study in Iranian families. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2014;19:28-35.
  16. Mumtaz Z, Salway SM. Gender, pregnancy and the uptake of antenatal care services in Pakistan. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2007;29:1-26.
  17. Toomey RB, Updegraff KA, Umaña-Taylor AJ, Jahromi LB. Gender role attitudes across the transition to adolescent motherhood in Mexican-origin families. Family Process. 2015;54:247-62.
  18. Schober P. The parenthood effect on gender inequality: Explaining the change in paid and domestic work when British couples become parents. European Sociological Review. 2013;29:74-85.
  19. Newkirk K, Perry-Jenkins M, Sayer AG. Division of Household and Childcare Labor and Relationship Conflict Among Low-Income New Parents. Sex Roles. 2017;76:319-33.
  20. Lindsey LL. Gender roles: a sociological perspective. 6th ed. US: Routledge; 2015.
  21. Jahanbaksh Z, Yousefi N, Keshavarz Afshar H. Change, Challenges, and Marital Satisfaction Transition to Parenthood among Iranian Women. Journal of Counseling Research. 2014;13:64-79. [In Persian]
  22. Holloway I, Wheeler S. Qualitative research in nursing and health care. 3rd ed. US: Willy Blackwell; 2010.
  23. Erfanian Arghavanian F, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Heydari A, Bahmani MND. Pregnant women’s experiences of social roles: An ethnophenomenological study. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2020;25:31-9.
  24. Morse JM. Mixing qualitative methods. Qualitative Health Research. 2009;19:1523-4.
  25. Morse JM. Simultaneous and sequential qualitative mixed method designs. Qualitative Inquiry. 2010;16:483-91.
  26. Maggs‐Rapport MPhil F. Combining methodological approaches in research: ethnography and interpretive phenomenology. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2000;31:219-25.
  27. Van Manen M. Researching lived experience. Human Science for an action Sensitive Pedagogy. 2nd ed. US: Routledge; 1997.
  28. Polit DF, Beck CT. Study guide for essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
  29. Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
  30. Hoodbhoy Z, Qureshi RN, Iqbal R, Muhabat Q. Household chores as the main source of physical activity: Perspectives of pregnant Pakistani women. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 2018;68:565-9.
  31. Mangeli M, Ramezani T, Mangeli S. The Effect of Educating about Common Changes in Pregnancy Period and the Way to Cope with them on Marital Satisfaction of Pregnant Women. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2009;8:305-13. [In Persian]
  32. Ali T, Krantz G, Gul R, et al. Gender roles and their influence on life prospects for women in urban Karachi, Pakistan: a qualitative study. Global Health Action. 2011;4:7448.
  33. Abbott P, Wallace C. An introduction to sociology: feminist perspectives. 1st ed. US: Routledge; 1997.
  34. Simbar M, Nahidi F, Ramezani Tehrani F, Ramezankhani A. Fathers’ Educational Needs about Perinatal Care: A Qualitative Approach. Hakim Research Journal. 2009;12:19-31. [In Persian]
  35. Eskandari N, Simbar M, Vadadhir A, Baghestani A. Exploring Fatherhood Based on Iranian Men`s Experiences: A Qualitative Research. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2015;25:69-83. [In Persian]
  36. Chin R, Hall P, Daiches A. Fathers’ experiences of their transition to fatherhood: a metasynthesis. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2011;29:4-18.
  37. Summers JA, Boller K, Schiffman RF, Raikes HH. The meaning of” good fatherhood:” Low-income fathers’ social constructions of their roles. Parenting. 2006;6:145-65.
  38. Pleck EH, Pleck JH. Fatherhood ideals in the United States: Historical dimensions. In: Lamb Me (editor). The role of the father in child development. 3rd ed. US: Wiley; 1997.
  39. Lamb ME, Pleck JH, Charnov EL, Levine JA. A biosocial perspective on paternal behavior and involvement. In: Lancaster JB, Altmann J, Rossi AS, Sherrod LR, eds. Parenting across the life span: Biosocial dimensions. UK: Aldine Publishing Company; 1987. p. 111–42.
  40. Mbekenga CK, Lugina HI, Christensson K, Olsson P. Postpartum experiences of firsttime fathers in a Tanzanian suburb: A qualitative interview study. Midwifery. 2011;27:174-80.
  41. Mortazavi F, Keramat A. The Study of Male Involvement in Prenatal Care in Shahroud and Sabzevar, Iran. Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal. 2012;6:66-74. [In Persian]
  42. Mannino CA, Deutsch FM. Changing the division of household labor: A negotiated process between partners. Sex Roles. 2007;56:309-24.
  43. Bartley SJ, Blanton PW, Gilliard JL. Husbands and Wives in Dual-Earner Marriages: Decision-Making, Gender Role Attitudes, Division of Household Labor, and Equity. Marriage & Family Review. 2005;37:69-94.
  44. Bianchi SM, Sayer LC, Milkie MA, Robinson JP. Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces. 2012;91:55-63.
  45. World Health Organization. Environmental health in emergencies: Vulnerable groups. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. [Cited 5 August 2020]. Available from: http://www.who.int/environmental_health_emergencies/vulnerable_groups/en/.
  46. Erfanian Arghavanian F, Heydari A, Noghani Dokht Bahmani M, Latifnejad Roudsari R. An Account of Iranian Pregnant Women’ Experiences of Spousal Role: An Ethnophenomenological Exploration. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2020;8:2404-18.
  47. Erfanian Arghavanian F, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Heydari A, Noghani Dokht Bahmani M. Men’s confrontation with pregnancy from women’s point of view: an ethno phenomenological approach. Journal of Caring Sciences. 2019;8:231-9.  
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,817
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,623


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب