LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,541
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,346
Gheisari, Rasoul, Arasteh, Peyman, Estakhri, Firuzeh, Eatemadi, Hesamoddin, Jamshidi, Aida, Khoshnoud, Mohammad Javad, Mokhtari, Maral. (1399). The Safety and Side Effects of Amide-Based Local Anesthetics in Rats with Acetaminophen-Induced Hepatic Injury. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 45(5), 377-382. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2020.72596.0
Rasoul Gheisari; Peyman Arasteh; Firuzeh Estakhri; Hesamoddin Eatemadi; Aida Jamshidi; Mohammad Javad Khoshnoud; Maral Mokhtari. "The Safety and Side Effects of Amide-Based Local Anesthetics in Rats with Acetaminophen-Induced Hepatic Injury". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 45, 5, 1399, 377-382. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2020.72596.0
Gheisari, Rasoul, Arasteh, Peyman, Estakhri, Firuzeh, Eatemadi, Hesamoddin, Jamshidi, Aida, Khoshnoud, Mohammad Javad, Mokhtari, Maral. (1399). 'The Safety and Side Effects of Amide-Based Local Anesthetics in Rats with Acetaminophen-Induced Hepatic Injury', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 45(5), pp. 377-382. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2020.72596.0
Gheisari, Rasoul, Arasteh, Peyman, Estakhri, Firuzeh, Eatemadi, Hesamoddin, Jamshidi, Aida, Khoshnoud, Mohammad Javad, Mokhtari, Maral. The Safety and Side Effects of Amide-Based Local Anesthetics in Rats with Acetaminophen-Induced Hepatic Injury. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1399; 45(5): 377-382. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2020.72596.0

The Safety and Side Effects of Amide-Based Local Anesthetics in Rats with Acetaminophen-Induced Hepatic Injury

Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
مقاله 8، دوره 45، شماره 5، آذر 2020، صفحه 377-382    اصل مقاله (242.05 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article(s)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijms.2020.72596.0
نویسندگان
Rasoul Gheisari1؛ Peyman Arasteh* 2؛ Firuzeh Estakhri3؛ Hesamoddin Eatemadi1؛ Aida Jamshidi4؛ Mohammad Javad Khoshnoud5؛ Maral Mokhtari6
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2Shiraz Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
4Student Research Committee, Shiraz Dental School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
5Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
6Department of Pathology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده
Background: The use of amide-based local anesthetics is generally considered to be safe. However, the literature on their safety in patients with hepatic injury is scarce. For the first time, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of five commonly used amide-based local anesthetics in the setting of hepatic failure.
Methods: A total of 96 Sprague-Dawley rats were studied from September 2015 to September 2016 in the Animal Laboratory Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. They divided into three groups, namely a control, induced liver failure (LF), and non-LF groups. The rats were administered local anesthetic agents (lidocaine, prilocaine with felypressin, lidocaine with epinephrine, mepivacaine, articaine, and prilocaine). The effect of these drugs was evaluated by comparing the liver enzyme levels of the rats. The data were analyzed using SPSS software. The independent t test, one-way ANOVA, and the post hoc tests were used to compare groups. A p Results: In non-LF rats, mepivacaine, lidocaine, and lidocaine with epinephrine caused a significant increase in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level compared with the effect of prilocaine with felypressin and articaine. In non-LF rats, only mepivacaine resulted in a significant increase in AST level compared with lidocaine (P=0.007) and prilocaine with felypressin (P=0.044). In this group, only mepivacaine caused a significant increase in alanine transaminase (ALT) level compared with lidocaine (P=0.016). Whereas in the LF group, mepivacaine caused an increase in ALT level compared with the effect of both prilocaine with felypressin (P=0.009) and articaine (p <0.001). The use of mepivacaine in the LF group caused a significant increase in gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase level compared prilocaine with felypressin (P=0.039).
Conclusion: Articaine and prilocaine with felypressin local anesthetics induced the least change in hepatic enzyme levels in rats with abnormal hepatic function.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Anesthetics؛ Local drug-related side effects and adverse reactions؛ Safety؛ Liver failure؛ Rats, Sprague-Dawley
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Suzuki S, Gerner P, Lirk P. Local anesthetics. Pharmacology and Physiology for Anesthesia. New York: Elsevier; 2019. p. 390-411.
  2. Moore PA, Hersh EV. Local anesthetics: pharmacology and toxicity. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54:587-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.06.015. PubMed PMID: 20831923.
  3. Sobolewski B, Doman P, Stetkiewicz T, Oszukowski P, Wozniak P. The toxic impact of local anaesthetics in menopausal women: causes, prevention and treatment after local anaesthetic overdose. Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity syndrome. Prz Menopauzalny. 2015;14:65-70. doi: 10.5114/pm.2015.50001. PubMed PMID: 26327891; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4440200.
  4. Oda Y. Pharmacokinetics and systemic toxicity of local anesthetics in children. J Anesth. 2016;30:547-50. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2201-6. PubMed PMID: 27312980.
  5. Lirk P, Picardi S, Hollmann MW. Local anaesthetics: 10 essentials. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31:575-85. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000137. PubMed PMID: 25192265.
  6. Giovannitti JA, Jr., Rosenberg MB, Phero JC. Pharmacology of local anesthetics used in oral surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013;25:453-65. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2013.03.003. PubMed PMID: 23660127.
  7. Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012;59:90-101. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.2.90. PubMed PMID: 22822998; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3403589.
  8. Batista da Silva C, Berto LA, Volpato MC, Ramacciato JC, Motta RH, Ranali J, et al. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine for incisive/mental nerve block. J Endod. 2010;36:438-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.014. PubMed PMID: 20171359.
  9. Pogrel MA. Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks: a current update. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2012;40:795-7. PubMed PMID: 23316560.
  10. Olfert ED, Cross BM, McWilliam AA. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Animal Care; 1993.
  11. Council NR. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Kinokuniya: National Academies Press; 2010.
  12. Sonis ST, Tracey C, Shklar G, Jenson J, Florine D. An animal model for mucositis induced by cancer chemotherapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;69:437-43. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(90)90376-4. PubMed PMID: 2326035.
  13. Gaertner DJ. Anesthesia and analgesia for laboratory rodents. Anesthesia and analgesia in laboratory animals. 2008:240-97. doi: 10.1016/B978-012373898-1.00010-4.
  14. Rosenberg PH, Veering BT, Urmey WF. Maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics: a multifactorial concept. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29:564-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.08.003. PubMed PMID: 15635516.
  15. Cox B, Durieux ME, Marcus MA. Toxicity of local anaesthetics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2003;17:111-36. doi: 10.1053/bean.2003.0275. PubMed PMID: 12751552.
  16. Yapp KE, Hopcraft MS, Parashos P. Articaine: a review of the literature. Br Dent J. 2011;210:323-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.240. PubMed PMID: 21475282.
  17. Kambalimath DH, Dolas RS, Kambalimath HV, Agrawal SM. Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013;12:3-10. doi: 10.1007/s12663-012-0368-4. PubMed PMID: 24431806; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3589513.
  18. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block. Int Endod J. 2009;42:238-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01507.x. PubMed PMID: 19228214.
  19. Ogle OE, Mahjoubi G. Local anesthesia: agents, techniques, and complications. Dent Clin North Am. 2012;56:133-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.08.003. PubMed PMID: 22117947.
  20. Zink W, Graf BM. Local anesthetic myotoxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29:333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.02.008. PubMed PMID: 15305253.
  21. El-Boghdadly K, Pawa A, Chin KJ. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: current perspectives. Local Reg Anesth. 2018;11:35-44. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S154512. PubMed PMID: 30122981; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6087022.
  22. Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012;59:90-101. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.2.90. PubMed PMID: 22822998; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3403589.
  23. Tortamano IP, Siviero M, Costa CG, Buscariolo IA, Armonia PL. A comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2009;35:165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.020. PubMed PMID: 19166765.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,347
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,839


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب