LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,089
تعداد مقالات9,995
تعداد مشاهده مقاله26,509,208
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله7,298,140
Mirzakhani, Kobra, Khadivzadeh, Talaat, Faridhosseini, Farhad, Ebadi, Abbas. (1399). Pregnant Women’s Experiences of the Conditions Affecting Marital Well-Being in High-Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 8(4), 345-357. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.85666.1285
Kobra Mirzakhani; Talaat Khadivzadeh; Farhad Faridhosseini; Abbas Ebadi. "Pregnant Women’s Experiences of the Conditions Affecting Marital Well-Being in High-Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 8, 4, 1399, 345-357. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.85666.1285
Mirzakhani, Kobra, Khadivzadeh, Talaat, Faridhosseini, Farhad, Ebadi, Abbas. (1399). 'Pregnant Women’s Experiences of the Conditions Affecting Marital Well-Being in High-Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 8(4), pp. 345-357. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.85666.1285
Mirzakhani, Kobra, Khadivzadeh, Talaat, Faridhosseini, Farhad, Ebadi, Abbas. Pregnant Women’s Experiences of the Conditions Affecting Marital Well-Being in High-Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1399; 8(4): 345-357. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.85666.1285

Pregnant Women’s Experiences of the Conditions Affecting Marital Well-Being in High-Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study

International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery
مقاله 7، دوره 8، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 32، دی 2020، صفحه 345-357    اصل مقاله (375.96 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.85666.1285
نویسندگان
Kobra Mirzakhani1؛ Talaat Khadivzadeh2؛ Farhad Faridhosseini3؛ Abbas Ebadi* 4، 5
1Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran;
2Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran;
3Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran;
4Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life style institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;
5Department of Nursing Management, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background: High-risk pregnancy is associated with many problems which can affect marital well-being as well as maternal and fetal health. Yet, there is limited information about the conditions which affect marital well-being in high-risk pregnancy. This study aimed to explore the pregnant women’s experiences of the conditions affecting marital well-being in high-risk pregnancy
Methods: This qualitative study was conducted from October 2018 to December 2019. Participants were 24 women with high-risk pregnancy who were purposively selected from three public and two private hospitals as well as a primary healthcare center in Mashhad, Iran. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted for data collection. Data were analyzed concurrently with data collection through Graneheim and Lundman’s content analysis (2004). The MAXQDA program (v. 10) was used for data management.
Results: Conditions affecting marital well-being in high-risk pregnancy were categorized into eleven subcategories and three main categories, namely emotional spousal intimacy in the midst of danger, husband’s commitment to manage the difficult conditions of pregnancy and sexual relationship during high-risk pregnancy.
Conclusion: Several conditions can affect marital well-being in high-risk pregnancy. Healthcare providers can develop and use strategies for the effective management of these conditions, thereby improving marital well-being among women with high-risk pregnancy.
کلیدواژه‌ها
High-risk؛ Marital؛ Pregnancy؛ Relationship؛ Well-being
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guideline scope Intrapartum care for high-risk women. UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2015.
  2. Michel KN, Ilunga BC, Astrid KM, et al. Epidemiological profile of high-risk pregnancies in Lubumbashi: case of the provincial hospital Janson Sendwe. Open Access Library Journal. 2016;3:1-7.
  3. Bajalan Z, Sabzevari Z, Qolizadeh A, Fariba Abdollahi. Prevalence of high-risk pregnancies and the correlation between the method of delivery and the maternal and neonatal outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2019;5:52-8. [In Persian]
  4. Wallwiener S, Goetz M, Lanfer A, et al. Epidemiology of mental disorders during pregnancy and link to birth outcome: A large-scale retrospective observational database study including 38,000 pregnancies. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2019;299:755-63.
  5. Oliveira DdC, Mandú ENT. Women with high-risk pregnancy: Experiences and perceptions of needs and care. Escola Anna Nery. 2015;19:93-101.
  6. Polachek IS, Dulitzky M, Margolis-Dorfman L, Simchen MJ. A simple model for prediction postpartum PTSD in high-risk pregnancies. Archives of Women’s Mental Health. 2016;19:483-90.
  7. Cao H, Zhou N, Fang X, Fine M. Marital well-being and depression in Chinese marriage: Going beyond satisfaction and ruling out critical confounders. Journal of Family Psychology. 2017;31:775-84.
  8. Ahmadi Forooshany SH, Yazdkhasti F, Safari Hajataghaie S, Nasr Esfahani MH. Infertile individuals’ marital relationship status, happiness, and mental health: A causal Model. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility. 2014;8:315-24.
  9. Alipour Z, Kazemi A, Kheirabadi G, Eslami AA. Relationship between marital quality, social support and mental health during pregnancy. Community Mental Health Journal. 2019;55:1-7.
  10. Gelaye B, Kajeepeta S, Williams MA. Suicidal ideation in pregnancy: An epidemiologic review. Archives of Women’s Mental Health. 2016;19:741-51.
  11. del Mar Sánchez-Fuentes M, Santos-Iglesias P, Sierra JC. A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2014;14:67-75.
  12. Rajabi G, Kaveh-Farsani Z, Amanelahi A, Khojasteh-Mehr R. Identifying the Components of Marital Relationship: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences. 2018;7:172-87. [In Persian]
  13. Ford J, Anderson C, Gillespie S, et al. Social Integration and Quality of Social Relationships as Protective Factors for Inflammation in a Nationally Representative Sample of Black Women. Journal of Urban Health. 2019;96:35-43.
  14. Henriksen RE, Thuen F. Marital quality and stress in pregnancy predict the risk of infectious disease in the offspring: the Norwegian mother and child cohort study. PloS One. 2015;10:e0137304.
  15. Broom BL. Impact of marital quality and psychological well-being on parental sensitivity. Nursing Research. 1994;43:138-43.
  16. Tavakol Z, Nikbakht Nasrabadi A, Behboodi Moghadam Z, et al. A review of the factors associated with marital satisfaction. Galen Medical Journal. 2017;6:197-207.
  17. Beveridge JK, Vannier SA, Rosen NO. Fear-based reasons for not engaging in sexual activity during pregnancy: associations with sexual and relationship well-being. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018;39:138-45.
  18. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today. 2004;24:105-12.
  19. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. 1st ed. US: Sage Publications; 1985.
  20. Park SS, Rosén LA. The marital scales: Measurement of intent, attitudes, and aspects regarding marital relationships. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2013;54:295-312.
  21. Roberson PNE, Norona JC, Lenger KA, Olmstead SB. How do Relationship Stability and Quality Affect Wellbeing? Romantic Relationship Trajectories, Depressive Symptoms, and Life Satisfaction across 30 Years. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2018;27:2171-84.
  22. Doorley JD, Kashdan TB, Alexander LA, et al. Distress tolerance in romantic relationships: A daily diary exploration with methodological considerations. Motivation and Emotion. 2019;43:505-16.
  23. Ibrahim SM, Lobel M. Conceptualization, measurement and effects of pregnancy-specific stress: review of research using the original and revised Prenatal Distress Questionnaire. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2020;43:16-33.
  24. Wallace Goddard H, Olson JR, Galovan AM, et al. Qualities of character that predict marital well‐being. Family Relations. 2016;65:424-38.
  25. Jiang Y, Lin X, Hinshaw SP, et al. Actor–Partner Interdependence of Compassion toward Others with Qualities of Marital Relationship and Parent–Child Relationships in Chinese Families. Family Process. 2020;59:740-55.
  26. Kirby JN. The role of mindfulness and compassion in enhancing nurturing family environments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2016;23:142-57.
  27. Fellmeth G, Plugge EH, Nosten S, et al. Living with severe perinatal depression: a qualitative study of the experiences of labour migrant and refugee women on the Thai-Myanmar border. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18:229.
  28. Janighorban M, Heidari Z, Dadkhah A, Mohammadi F. Women’s Needs on Bed Rest during High-risk pregnancy and Postpartum Period: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2018;6:1327-35.
  29. Alterman T, Tsai R, Ju J, Kelly KM. Trust in the Work Environment and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Findings from the Gallup-Sharecare Well-Being Index. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16:230.
  30. Ramsdell EL, Franz M, Brock RL. A Multifaceted and Dyadic Examination of Intimate Relationship Quality during Pregnancy: Implications for Global Relationship Satisfaction. Family Process. 2020;59:556-70.
  31. Jakubiak BK, Feeney BC. Hand-in-hand combat: Affectionate touch promotes relational well-being and buffers stress during conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2019;45:431-46.
  32. River LM, Narayan AJ, Atzl VM, et al. Romantic partner support during pregnancy: The discrepancy between self-reported and coder-rated support as a risk factor for prenatal psychopathology and stress. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2020;37:27-46.
  33. Nosrati A, Mirzakhani K, Golmakani N, et al. Effect of Paternal-Fetal Attachment on Maternal-Mental Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2017;27:50-62. [In Presian]
  34. Surkan PJ, Dong L, Ji Y, et al. Paternal involvement and support and risk of preterm birth: findings from the Boston birth cohort. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019;40:48-56.
  35. Fromm E. The art of loving. UK: A&C Black; 2000.
  36. Nie C, Dai Q, Zhao R, et al. The impact of resilience on psychological outcomes in women with threatened premature labor and spouses: a cross-sectional study in Southwest China. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2017;15:26.
  37. Wei DM, Yeung SLA, He JR, et al. The role of social support in family socio-economic disparities in depressive symptoms during early pregnancy: Evidence from a Chinese birth cohort. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2018;238:418-23.
  38. Jamali S, Javadpour S, Alborzi M, et al. A Study of Men’s Sexuality and their Attitude during their Wives’ Pregnancy. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2018;12:QC24-8.
  39. Masoumi SZ, Kheirollahi N, Rahimi A, et al. Effect of a Sex Education Program on Females’ Sexual Satisfaction During Pregnancy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2018;12:e6105.
  40. Janghorban R, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Taghipour A, et al. The shadow of silence on the sexual rights of married Iranian women. Biomed Research International. 2015;2015:520827.
  41. Shoorab NJ, Mirteimouri M, Taghipour A, et al. Women’s Experiences of Emotional Recovery from Childbirth-Related Perineal Trauma: A Qualitative Content analysis. International journal of community based nursing and midwifery. 2019;7:181-91.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,215
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,825


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب