Background: Identifying the effect of the social environment in which couples live and the demographic decisions are made, along with individual characteristics, are important in explaining human fertility. In the present study, an attempt was made to explain women’s fertility in the six provinces using the multi-level analysis.
Methods: The present study is a quantitative research with emphasis on the secondary analysis of the existing data.The statistical population consists of married women aged 15-49 living in the selected provinces. The sample included 95421 individuals. The selected provinces were Gilan, Mazandaran, Tehran, Sistan & Baluchistan, South Khorasan and Hormozgan. The census micro-data of population and housing in 2016 as well as some socio-economic indexes of selected provinces were analyzed using HLM software. Place of residence, educational level and employment status were individual variables, while income per capita as well as unemployment and literacy rates were the contextual variables. Also, the number of children ever born was considered as the fertility index or dependent variable.
Results: The impact of individual variables on women’s fertility is stronger than community effects. There were statistically significant inter-provincial differences in women’s fertility. All the women’s individual characteristics had a statistically significant impact on their fertility. Unemployment and literacy rates, as contextual effects, had a statistically significant impact on inter-provincial fertility.
Conclusion: The inter-provincial differences in the fertility originate from their socio-economic circumstances. If the provinces’ socio-economic circumstances become similar, the
convergence in fertility behavior across provinces may increase. |
- Baschieri A. Effect of modernization on desired fertility in Egypt. Popul Space Place. 2007; 13 (5): 353-376.
- Dribe M, Juarez SP, Scalone F. Is it who you are or where you live? Community effects on net fertility at the onset of fertility decline: a multilevel analysis using Swedish micro-census data. Popul Space Place. 2017; 23 (2): e 1987.
- Hirschman C, Guest PH. Multilevel models of fertility determination in four southeast Asian countries: 1970 and 1980. Demography. 1990; 27 (3): 369-396.
- Sobotka T, Skirbekk V, Philipov D. Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Popul Dev Rev. 2011; 37 (2): 267-306.
- Yoo SH. Educational differentials in cohort fertility during the fertility transition in South Korea. Demogr. Res. 2014; 30: 1463-1494.
- Rios-Neto ELG, Miranda-Ribeiro A, Miranda-Ribeiro P. Fertility differentials by education in Brazil: from the conclusion of fertility to the onset of postponement transition. Popul Dev Rev. 2018; 44 (3): 489-517.
- Dreze J, Murthi M. Fertility, education and development: evidence from India. Popul Dev Rev. 2001; 27 (1): 33-63.
- Hank K, Kreyenfeld M. A multilevel analysis of child care and women’s fertility decisions in western Germany. J Marriage Fam. 2003; 65 (3): 584-596.
- Abbasi-Shavazi MJ. The Changes and Status of population in the Islamic Republic of Iran. National Population Studies and Comprehensive Management Institute Press, Tehran; 2012.
- Abbasi –Shavazi MJ, Hosseini-Chavoshi M, McDonald P. The path to below replacement fertility in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Asia Pac Popul J. 2007;22(2): 91-112.
- Abbasi –Shavazi MJ, McDonald P. National and provincial level-fertility trends in Iran, 1972-2000, Working Papers in Demography, Australian National University, Canberra, 2005.
- Abbasi –Shavazi MJ, McDonald P. Fertility decline in the Islamic Republic of Iran: 1972-2000. Asian Population Studies. 2006; 2(3): 217-237
- Abassi-Shavazi MJ, Askari-Nodoshan A. Family change and decline in fertility in Iran: A case study of Yazd province. Journal of Social Sciences. 2005; 11(3): 45-75.
- Abassi-Shavazi MJ, Sadeghi R. Study of population and socio-economic situation of young people in Iran. UNFPA, Tehran; 2013.
- Abbasi –Shavazi MJ, Hosseini-Chavoshi M. The evolution of fertility in Iran over four decades. The statistical Center of Iran, Tehran; 2013.
- The statistical Center of Iran. The results of 2016 census. [Internet]. Tehran: Statistical Center; 2016. Available from: amar.org.ir Available at www.amar.org.ir
- Amirkafi M. The importance of multi-level logic models in social research. Journal of Iranian Society Studies. 2006; 7: 38-71.
- Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical linear models. Sage Publications, lnc; 1992.
- The statistical Center of Iran. The Micro-census data of General Population and Housing Census in 2016 [Internet]. Tehran: Statistical Center; 2016. Available from: amar.org.ir
- The statistical Center of Iran. General Population and Housing Census in 2016 [Internet]. Tehran: Statistical Center; 2016. Available from: amar.org.ir
- The statistical Center of Iran. Regional Accounts during 2011-2016. [Internet]. Tehran: Statistical Center; 2016. Available from: amar.org.ir
- Kreyenfeld M, Konietzka D. Education and fertility in Germany. In: Hamm I, Seitz H, Werding M. Demographic change in Germany. Berlin: Springer; 2008. pp. 165-187.
- Lam G. How does gender equity affect fertility in Hong Kong? [dissertation]. [Hong Kong]. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; 2007.
- Kiani M. Women’s attitude to fertility in Iran: A case study in Isfahan, Iran. Social Sciences Journal of Tabriz University. 2011; 6: 398-403
- Ghazi-Tabatabai M, Mehri N. Measuring the effect on fertility of Iranian responsibility for working women. Wom Dev Pol. 2013; 11: 29-44.
- Mansoureian MK, Khoshnevis A. Sexual preferences and tendencies of married women of reproductive behavior: a case study in Tehran. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2006; 24: 129-146.
- Mahmoudi M, Zaraati H, Akbari A, Majlesi F. Relationship between socio-economic and demographic factors with fertility. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences. 2008; 15: 40-45.
- Mahmoudiani-Gilan S, Sadeghi R. Individual and provincial characteristics associated with reproductive behavior of married women in Iran (2011). Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. 2015; 18(11): 640-647.
- Mahmoudiani S, Shahriari S. Religion and development roles in fertility behavior among kurdish women in Iran. Scientific Journal of Kurdistan Uniersity of Medical Sciences. 2015; 20(4): 91-100.
- Fetros MH, Najmi M, Memarzadeh A. An analysis of relationship between women’s employment rate and fertility rate in Iran. Wom Dev Pol. 2017; 15(3): 311-313.
|
