LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,439
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,232
Nemati, Fataneh, Mohammadi, Mahdi, Gholami, Mehrdad. (1400). A Survey on Exposure Parameters Variation due to Aging in Radiology Devices. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(3), 407-412. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1154
Fataneh Nemati; Mahdi Mohammadi; Mehrdad Gholami. "A Survey on Exposure Parameters Variation due to Aging in Radiology Devices". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 3, 1400, 407-412. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1154
Nemati, Fataneh, Mohammadi, Mahdi, Gholami, Mehrdad. (1400). 'A Survey on Exposure Parameters Variation due to Aging in Radiology Devices', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(3), pp. 407-412. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1154
Nemati, Fataneh, Mohammadi, Mahdi, Gholami, Mehrdad. A Survey on Exposure Parameters Variation due to Aging in Radiology Devices. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1400; 11(3): 407-412. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1154

A Survey on Exposure Parameters Variation due to Aging in Radiology Devices

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 16، دوره 11، شماره 3، شهریور 2021، صفحه 407-412    اصل مقاله (702.82 K)
نوع مقاله: Technical Note
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1154
نویسندگان
Fataneh Nemati1؛ Mahdi Mohammadi2؛ Mehrdad Gholami* 3
1MSc, Science & Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2PhD Candidate, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3PhD, Department of Medical Physics, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
چکیده
The inevitable use of medical imaging examinations and lack of a suitable alternative lead to the need to control and minimize the amount of radiation from such artificial medical sources. To assess the relation between exposure parameters and lifetime of radiology devices, quality control tests were carried out on 13 radiology devices in 11 general hospitals. In this study, a barracuda dosimeter, SE-43137 Sweden, was calibrated to measure and record the quantities of kVp, mAs and exposure parameters. In all the devices using applying the minimum and maximum values of kVp, the minimum and maximum values of the internal resistances were calculated. The lowest mR/mA for the device C was observed at a flow rate of 200 mA (equal to 2,425), while the highest value was for the device A (2) at a current intensity of 200 mA (equal to 14.625). By increasing the age of the device, the output of the device is reduced. Therefore, to compensate for this decrease in the output, higher exposure conditions are usually applied to the device, which can greatly increase the damage to the device.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Quality Control؛ Radiology Devices؛ Aging؛ Internal Resistance؛ Hospitals
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. World Health Organization. Quality assurance in diagnostic radiology. Geneva: WHO; 1982.
  2. Périard M, Chaloner P. Diagnostic X-ray imaging quality assurance: an overview. Can J Med Radiat Technol. 1996;27:171-7.
  3. Gholami M, Nemati F, Karami V. The evaluation of conventional X-ray exposure parameters including tube voltage and exposure time in private and governmental hospitals of Lorestan Province, Iran. Iran J Med Phys. 2015;12:85-92.
  4. Papadimitriou D, Perris A, Molfetas MG, Panagiotakis N, Manetou A, Tsourouflis G, et al. Patient dose, image quality and radiographic techniques for common X ray examinations in two Greek hospitals and comparison with European guidelines. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2001;95:43-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006521.PubMed PMID: 11468804.
  5. Shahbazi-Gahrouei D. Entrance surface dose measurements for routine X-ray examinations in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari hospitals. Iranian Journal of Radiation Research. 2006;4:29-34.
  6. Khoshbin Khoshnazar A, Hejazi P, Mokhtarian M, Nooshi S. Quality control of radiography equipments in Golestan Province of Iran. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2013;10:37-44.
  7. Schaefer-Prokop C, Neitzel U, Venema HW, Uffmann M, Prokop M. Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1818-30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0948-3. PubMed PMID: 18431577. PubMed PMCID: PMC2516181.
  8. European Society of Radiology. Renewal of radiological equipment. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:543-6. doi: 10.1007/s13244-014-0345-1. PubMed PMID: 25230589. PubMed PMCID: PMC4195838.
  9. Akpochafor MO, Omojola AD, Soyebi KO, Adeneye SO, Aweda MA, Ajayi HB. Assessment of peak kilovoltage accuracy in ten selected X-ray centers in Lagos metropolis, South-Western Nigeria: A quality control test to determine energy output accuracy of an X-ray generator. Journal of Health Research and Reviews. 2016;3:60. doi: 10.4103/2394-2010.184231.
  10. Asadinezhad M, Bahreyni Toossi MT, Ebrahiminia A, Giahi M. Quality control assessment of conventional radiology devices in Iran. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2017;14:1-7.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,127
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 411


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب