LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,417,446
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,295,272
Moghimnezhad, Mahdi, Shahidian, Azadeh, Andayesh, Mohammad. (1400). Multiphysics Analysis of Ultrasonic Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Side Effects on Surrounding Tissues. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(6), 701-712. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1182
Mahdi Moghimnezhad; Azadeh Shahidian; Mohammad Andayesh. "Multiphysics Analysis of Ultrasonic Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Side Effects on Surrounding Tissues". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 6, 1400, 701-712. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1182
Moghimnezhad, Mahdi, Shahidian, Azadeh, Andayesh, Mohammad. (1400). 'Multiphysics Analysis of Ultrasonic Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Side Effects on Surrounding Tissues', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(6), pp. 701-712. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1182
Moghimnezhad, Mahdi, Shahidian, Azadeh, Andayesh, Mohammad. Multiphysics Analysis of Ultrasonic Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Side Effects on Surrounding Tissues. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1400; 11(6): 701-712. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1182

Multiphysics Analysis of Ultrasonic Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Side Effects on Surrounding Tissues

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 5، دوره 11، شماره 6، اسفند 2021، صفحه 701-712    اصل مقاله (1.82 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1182
نویسندگان
Mahdi Moghimnezhad1؛ Azadeh Shahidian* 2؛ Mohammad Andayesh3
1MSc, Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N . Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2PhD, Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
3BSc, Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background: Today, the most common method for kidney stone therapy is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Current research is a numerical simulation of kidney stone fragmentation via ultrasonic shock waves. Most numerical studies in lithotripsy have been carried out using the elasticity or energy method and neglected the dissipation phenomenon. In the current study, it is solved by not only the linear acoustics equation, but also the Westervelt acoustics equation which nonlinearity and dissipation are involved.
Objective: This study is to compare two methods for simulation of shock wave lithotripsy, clarifying the effect of shock wave profiles and stones’ material, and investigating side effects on surrounding tissues.
Material and Methods: Computational study is done using COMSOL Multiphysics, commercial software based on the finite element method. Nonlinear governing equations of acoustics, elasticity and bioheat-transfer are coupled and solved.
Results: A decrease in the rise time of shock wave leads to increase the produced acoustic pressure and enlarge focus region. The shock wave damages kidney tissues in both linear and nonlinear simulation but the damage due to high temperature is very negligible compared to the High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU).
Conclusion: Disaffiliation of wave nonlinearity causes a high incompatibility with reality. Stone’s material is an important factor, affecting the fragmentation.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Kidney Calculi؛ Ultrasonic Waves؛ Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy؛ Finite Element Method؛ Soft Tissue Injuries
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Mohammadalibeigi F, Shirani M, Seyed-Salehi H, Afzali L. Biochemical urinalysis of healthy kidney and stone-generating kidney in unilateral urolithiasis. Journal of Renal Injury Prevention. 2019;8(2):151-6. doi: 10.15171/jrip.2019.28.
  2. Zeng J, Wang S, Zhong L, Huang Z, Zeng Y, Zheng D, Zou W, Lai H. A Retrospective Study of Kidney Stone Recurrence in Adults. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. 2019;11(3):208-12. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3753. PubMed PMID: 30834044. PubMed PMCID: PMC6396780.
  3. Eliahou R, Hidas G, Duvdevani M, Sosna J. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computed tomography: an emerging application. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI. 2010;31(4):315-20. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2010.05.002.
  4. Warty Y, Haryanto F, Fitri LA, Haekal M, Herman H. A Spatial Distribution Analysis on the Deposition Mechanism Complexity of the Organic Material of Kidney Stone. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020;10(3):273-82. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1104.
  5. Ueberle F. Application of shock waves and pressure pulses in medicine. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Handbook of Medical Technology; 2011. p. 641-75.
  6. Beik J, Mehdizadeh AR, Shakeri-Zadeh A. Ultrasound in cancer treatment through nanotechnology. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2016;6(3):123-6. PubMed PMID: 27853719. PubMed PMCID: PMC5106544.
  7. Ghassemi M, Shahidian A. Nano and bio heat transfer and fluid flow. Elsevier Science; 2017.
  8. Aayani R, Shahidian A, Ghassemi M. Numerical Investigation of Non-Newtonian Blood Effect on Acoustic Streaming. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics. 2016;9(1):173-6.
  9. López-Haro SA, Gutiérrez MI, Vera A, Leija L. Modeling the thermo-acoustic effects of thermal-dependent speed of sound and acoustic absorption of biological tissues during focused ultrasound hyperthermia. Journal of Medical Ultrasonics. 2015;42(4):489-98. doi: 10.1007/s10396-015-0643-3.
  10. Bailey MR, Khokhlova VA, Sapozhnikov OA, Kargl SG, Crum LA. Physical mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of ultrasound (a review). Acoustical Physics. 2003;49(4):369-88. doi: 10.1134/1.1591291.
  11. Dai JC, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD, Harper JD. Innovations in Ultrasound Technology in the Management of Kidney Stones. Urologic Clinics. 2019;46(2):273-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.12.009.
  12. Wess OJ, Mayer J. Fragmentation of brittle material by shock wave lithotripsy. Momentum transfer and inertia: a novel view on fragmentation mechanisms. Urolithiasis. 2018:137-49. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1102-6.
  13. Lawler AC, Ghiraldi EM, Tong C, Friedlander JI. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: current perspectives and future directions. Current Urology reports. 2017;18(4):25. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0672-0.
  14. Ghorbani M, Oral O, Ekici S, Gozuacik D, Koşar A. Review on lithotripsy and cavitation in urinary stone therapy. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 2016;9:264-83. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2016.2573381.
  15. Wang KG. Multiphase fluid-solid coupled analysis of shock-bubble-stone interaction in shockwave lithotripsy. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering. 2017;33(10):e2855. doi; 10.1002/cnm.2855.
  16. Zhu S, Cocks FH, Preminger GM, Zhong P. The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2002;28(5):661-71. doi: 10.1016/S0301-5629(02)00506-9.
  17. Chaussy CH, Brendel W, Schmiedt E. Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. The Lancet. 1980;316(8207):1265-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(80)92335-1.
  18. Xi X, Zhong P. Dynamic photoelastic study of the transient stress field in solids during shock wave lithotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;109(3):1226-39. doi: 10.1121/1.1349183.
  19. Zhang Y, Nault I, Mitran S, Iversen ES, Zhong P. Effects of stone size on the comminution process and efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2016;42(11):2662-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.06.018.
  20. Dahake G, Gracewski SM. Finite difference predictions of P-SV wave propagation inside submerged solids. I. Liquid–solid interface conditions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102(4):2125-37. doi: 10.1121/1.419592.
  21. Dahake G, Gracewski SM. Finite difference predictions of P-SV wave propagation inside submerged solids. II. Effect of geometry. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102(4):2138-45. doi: 10.1121/1.419593.
  22. Cleveland RO, Sapozhnikov OA. Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118(4):2667-76. doi: 10.1121/1.2032187.
  23. Weinberg K, Ortiz M. Kidney damage in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a numerical approach for different shock profiles. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2009;8(4):285. doi: 10.1007/s10237-008-0135-0.
  24. Li W, Zhang J, Francis LS, editors. Handbook of LC-MS bioanalysis: best practices, experimental protocols, and regulations. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
  25. Kyriakou A. Multi-physics computational modeling of focused ultrasound therapies. ETH Zurich; 2015.
  26. Suomi V, Jaros J, Treeby B, Cleveland RO. Full Modeling of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Thermal Heating in the Kidney Using Realistic Patient Models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018;65(11):2660-70. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2870064. PMID: 30222549.
  27. Haddadi S, Ahmadian MT. Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound–Induced Lesions in Liver Tissue Ex Vivo. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2018;37(6):1481-91. doi: 10.1002/jum.14491.
  28. Nyame YA, De S, Sarkissian C, Brown R, Kartha G, Babbar P, Monga M. Kidney stone models for in vitro lithotripsy research: a comprehensive review. Journal of Endourology. 2015;29(10):1106-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0850. PMID: 25924100.
  29. Steinbach P, Wörle K, Seidl M, Seitz R, Hofstädter F. Effects of high-energy ultrasonic shock waves on tumor cells in vitro and human endothelial cells in situ shock wave lithotripsy, aspects and Forecasts. Tübingen: University Library; 1993. p. 104-9
  30. Miller DL, Thomas RM. Thresholds for hemorrhages in mouse skin and intestine induced by lithotripter shock waves. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 1995;21(2):249-57. doi: 10.1016/S0301-5629(94)00112-X.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,398
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 970


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب