LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,532
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,333
Maruti Pol, Manjunath. (1398). The effect of various surgical techniques in difficult cholecystectomy: A retrospective cohort study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 8(1), 23-28. doi: 10.30476/acrr.2020.46494
Manjunath Maruti Pol. "The effect of various surgical techniques in difficult cholecystectomy: A retrospective cohort study". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 8, 1, 1398, 23-28. doi: 10.30476/acrr.2020.46494
Maruti Pol, Manjunath. (1398). 'The effect of various surgical techniques in difficult cholecystectomy: A retrospective cohort study', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 8(1), pp. 23-28. doi: 10.30476/acrr.2020.46494
Maruti Pol, Manjunath. The effect of various surgical techniques in difficult cholecystectomy: A retrospective cohort study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1398; 8(1): 23-28. doi: 10.30476/acrr.2020.46494

The effect of various surgical techniques in difficult cholecystectomy: A retrospective cohort study

Iranian Journal of Colorectal Research
مقاله 4، دوره 8، شماره 1، خرداد 2020، صفحه 23-28    اصل مقاله (548.85 K)
نوع مقاله: Research/Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/acrr.2020.46494
نویسنده
Manjunath Maruti Pol*
All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi
چکیده
Background: Success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends on multiple factors.Knowledge about altered anatomy, physiology and pathology of gall bladder, and thesurgeons experience in applying different surgical technique during difficult cholecystectomy
are collectively important for a safe outcome.
Methods: A total data of 875 patients who underwent cholecystectomy were analysed from June 2014 to May 2019. Study was mainly focused on looking for various intraoperative findings that could be the reason for conversion to open cholecystectomy in patients with difficult anatomy, physiology and pathology associated gall stone disease.
Results: about 279/875 (31.9%) had difficult gall bladder with altered anatomy and pathology. Overall, conversion rate among difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 62/279 (22.2%). 36/875 (2.4%) patients undergone subtotal cholecystectomy. 1/875 (0.1%)
had common bile duct injury underwent repair. 54/875 (61.7%) had developed overall complications and 1/875 (0.1%) died due sepsis.
Conclusion: High conversion rate and complications are seen in patients with contracted gallbladder and adhesions due to previous intervention. Conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy is not a complication but continuum of treatment to reduce morbidity. Use of the critical view of safety technique very useful.
کلیدواژه‌ها
laparoscopic cholecystectomy؛ open؛ surgery
مراجع
  1. Mir IS, Mohsin M, Kirmani O, et al. Is intra-operative cholangiography necessary during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A multicentre rural experience from a developing world country. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(33):4493-7
  2. Sari YS, Tunali V, Tomaoglu K, et al. Can bile duct injuries be prevented? “A new technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.” BMC Surg. 2005;5:14
  3. Tang B, Cuschieri A. Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2006; 10(7): 1081–91
  4. Ibrahim S, Hean TK, Ho LS, Ravintharan T, Chye TN, Chee CH. Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2006;30(9):1698–704
  5. Tayeb M, Raza SA, Khan MR, Azami R. Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors. J Postgrad Med. 2005; 51(1):17–20
  6. Simopoulos C, Botaitis S, Polychronidis A, Tripsianis G, Karayiannakis AJ. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(7):905–9
  7. Boerma D, Rauwa EA, Keulemans YC, et al. Wait and see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002; 360(9335): 761-5
  8. Sarli I, Iusco DR, Roncoroni L. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10 year experience. World J Surg 2003: 27:180-186
  9. Allen NL, Leeth RR, Finan KR et al. Outcomes of cholecytectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10: 292-296
  10. Erdal Birol Bostanei, Metin Ercan et al. Timing of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with shphncterotomy : a prospective observational study of 308 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395: 661-666
  11. Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2002; 184(3): 254–8
  12. Singh K, Ohri A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy – is there a need to convert? J Minimal Access Surg. 2005; 1(2): 59–62
  13. Karayiannakis AJ, Polychronidis A, Perente S, Botaitis S, Simopoulos C. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(1): 97–101
  14. Lal P, Agarwal PN, Malik VK, Chakravarti AL. A difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy that requires conversion to open procedure can be predicted by preoperative ultrasonography. JSLS. 2002; 6(1): 59–63
  15. Nagral S. Anatomy relevant to cholecystectomy. J Minimal Access Surg. 2005; 1(2): 53–8
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 376
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 360


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب