LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,519
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,426,125
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,296,810
Sinha, A, Singh, N, Dixit, B M, Painuly, N K, Patni, H K, Yadav, A. (1398). Evaluation of Electron Specific Absorbed Fractions in Organs of Digimouse Voxel Phantom Using Monte Carlo Simulation Code FLUKA. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 9(2), 161-166. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v9i2Apr.529
A Sinha; N Singh; B M Dixit; N K Painuly; H K Patni; A Yadav. "Evaluation of Electron Specific Absorbed Fractions in Organs of Digimouse Voxel Phantom Using Monte Carlo Simulation Code FLUKA". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 9, 2, 1398, 161-166. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v9i2Apr.529
Sinha, A, Singh, N, Dixit, B M, Painuly, N K, Patni, H K, Yadav, A. (1398). 'Evaluation of Electron Specific Absorbed Fractions in Organs of Digimouse Voxel Phantom Using Monte Carlo Simulation Code FLUKA', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 9(2), pp. 161-166. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v9i2Apr.529
Sinha, A, Singh, N, Dixit, B M, Painuly, N K, Patni, H K, Yadav, A. Evaluation of Electron Specific Absorbed Fractions in Organs of Digimouse Voxel Phantom Using Monte Carlo Simulation Code FLUKA. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1398; 9(2): 161-166. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v9i2Apr.529

Evaluation of Electron Specific Absorbed Fractions in Organs of Digimouse Voxel Phantom Using Monte Carlo Simulation Code FLUKA

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 4، دوره 9، شماره 2، تیر 2019، صفحه 161-166    اصل مقاله (494.72 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v9i2Apr.529
نویسندگان
A Sinha* 1؛ N Singh2؛ B M Dixit1؛ N K Painuly2؛ H K Patni3؛ A Yadav4
1Faculty of Physical Sciences, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, Lucknow, India
2Department of Radiotherapy, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India
3Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Mumbai, India
4Department of Radiodiagnosis, Uttar Pradesh Rural Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Saifai- Etawah, India
چکیده
Background: For preclinical evaluations of radiopharmaceuticals, most studies are carried out on mice. Values of electron specific absorbed fractions (SAF) have had vital role in the assessment of absorbed dose. In past studies, electron specific absorbed fractions were given for limited source target pairs using older reports of human organ compositions.Objective: Electron specific absorbed fraction values for monoenergetic electrons of energies 15, 50, 100, 500, 1000 and 4000 keV were evaluated for the Digimouse voxel phantom incorporated in Monte Carlo code FLUKA. The organ sources considered in this study were lungs, skeleton, heart, bladder, testis, stomach, spleen, pancreas, liver, kidney, adrenal, eye and brain. The considered target organs were lungs, skeleton, heart, bladder, testis, stomach, spleen, pancreas, liver, kidney, adrenal and brain. Eye and brain were considered as target organs only for eye and brain as source organs. From the latest report (International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP) publication number 110, organ compositions and densities were adopted.Results: The electron specific absorbed fraction values for self-irradiation decreases with increasing electron energy. The electron specific absorbed fraction values for cross-irradiation are also found to be dependent on the electron energy and the geometries of source and target. Organ masses and electron specific absorbed fraction values are presented in tabular form. Conclusion: The results of this study will be useful in evaluating the absorbed dose to various organs of mice similar in size to the present study.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Electron specific Absorbed Fraction؛ Digimouse Voxel Phantom؛ Monte Carlo Simulation؛ FLUKA
مراجع
  1. Hui TE, Fisher DR, Kuhn JA, Williams LE, Nourigat C, Badger CC, et al. A mouse model for calculating cross-organ beta doses from yttrium-90-labeled immunoconjugates. Cancer. 1994;73:951-7. PubMed PMID: 8306284.
  2. Kolbert KS, Watson T, Matei C, Xu S, Koutcher JA, Sgouros G. Murine S factors for liver, spleen, and kidney. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:784-91. PubMed PMID: 12732681.
  3. Hindorf C, Ljungberg M, Strand SE. Evaluation of parameters influencing S values in mouse dosimetry. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1960-5. PubMed PMID: 15534069.
  4. Stabin MG, Peterson TE, Holburn GE, Emmons MA. Voxel-based mouse and rat models for internal dose calculations. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:655-9. PubMed PMID: 16595500.
  5. Bitar A, Lisbona A, Thedrez P, Sai Maurel C, Le Forestier D, Barbet J, et al. A voxel-based mouse for internal dose calculations using Monte Carlo simulations (MCNP). Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:1013-25. doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/4/010. PubMed PMID: 17264367.
  6. Taschereau R, Chatziioannou AF. Monte Carlo simulations of absorbed dose in a mouse phantom from 18-fluorine compounds. Med Phys. 2007;34:1026-36. doi.org/10.1118/1.2558115. PubMed PMID: 17441249. PubMed PMCID: 3006169.
  7. Snyder W. Report of the Task Group on Reference Man: Prepared by a Task Group of Committee 2 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: Adopted by the Commission in Oct. 1974: Pergamon; 1975.
  8. ICRU, II. Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. 1989.
  9. Dogdas B, Stout D, Chatziioannou AF, Leahy RM. Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:577-87. doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/3/003. PubMed PMID: 17228106. PubMed PMCID: 3006167.
  10. Sinha A, Patni H, Dixit B, Painuly N, Singh N. Estimation of Photon Specific Absorbed Fractions in Digimouse Voxel Phantom using Monte Carlo Simulation Code FLUKA. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering. 2015.
  11. Menzel HG, Clement C, DeLuca P. ICRP Publication 110. Realistic reference phantoms: an ICRP/ICRU joint effort. A report of adult reference computational phantoms. Ann ICRP. 2009;39:1-164. PubMed PMID: 19897132.
  12. Photon E. Proton and Neutron Interaction Data for Body Tissues. ICRU report. 1992;46:13.
  13. ICorpC. Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection: the Skeleton: A Report of a Task Group of Committee 2 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Adopted by the Commission in July 1994: Pergamon Press; 1995.
  14. Patni HK, Akar DK, Nadar MY, Ghare VP, Rao DD, Sarkar PK. Estimation of specific absorbed fractions for selected organs due to photons emitted by activity deposited in the human respiratory tract using ICRP/ICRU male voxel phantom in FLUKA. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013;153:32-46. doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs087. PubMed PMID: 22645381.
  15. Vennart J. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. Practical Implications. 1979:175.
  16. Synder WS, Ford MR, Warner GG. Estimates of Specific absorbed fractions for photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a Heterogeneous phantom. New York: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1978. pp. 1–67.
  17. Mohammadi A, Kinase S. Electron absorbed fractions and S values in a mouse voxel phantom. Radioisotopes. 2011;60:505-12. doi.org/10.3769/radioisotopes.60.505.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 758
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 240


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب