|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||11,040,140|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||5,529,920|
Designing and Validation of Health-Related Quality of Life Inventory for Family Caregivers of Hemodialysis Patients
|International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery|
|مقاله 7، دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 30، تیر 2020، صفحه 164-176 اصل مقاله (434.29 K)|
|نوع مقاله: Original Article|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijcbnm.2020.83081.1118|
|Seyedeh Azam Sajadi1؛ Abbas Ebadi* 2؛ Seyed Tayeb Moradian3؛ Roghayeh Akbari4|
|1Department of Nursing Management, School of Nursing , Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;|
|2Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;|
|3Atherosclerosis Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;|
|4Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran|
|Background: Family caregivers are important sources of care for hemodialysis patients. Although caring for a family member is a pleasant feeling, experiencing lots of physical and psychological caregiving burden influences the quality of life among family caregivers of hemodialysis patients.This study aimed to design and validate the quality of life inventory for family caregivers of patients on hemodialysis.|
Methods: A sequential-exploratory mixed method was conducted in Tehran, Iran, in 2017-2018. In the qualitative phase, the researcher conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 19 participants. Finally, a pool of 93 items was extracted from this phase. Then, psychometric properties such as face validity (Impact Score>1.5), content validity ratio (CVR>0.63), content validity index (Item Content Validity Index: ICVI>0.78 , Scale Content Validity Index/Average: SCVI/Ave>0.8) and Kappa value (Kappa>0.7, internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha>0.7), relative reliability (ICC:interclass correlation coefficient),absolute reliability (Standard Error of Measurement: SEM and Minimal Detectable Changes: MDC), convergent validity (Correlation Coefficient between 0.4-0.7), interpretability, responsiveness, feasibility, and ceiling and floor effects were assessed
Results: The quality of life inventory for family caregivers of hemodialysis patients was developed with 34 items and five factors (namely patient care burden, conflict, positive perception of situations, self-actualization, fear, and concern). The findings confirm that the scale is acceptable regarding validity, reliability and other measurement features.
Conclusions: This inventory is consistent with the health care status in Iran. Therefore, it can be used to measure the quality of life among family caregivers of hemodialysis patients.
|Dialysis؛ Family caregivers؛ Inventory؛ Psychometric؛ Quality of life؛ Questionnaire|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
1 Pinto FNFR, Barham EJ, Prette ZAPD.
Interpersonal conflicts among family
caregivers of the elderly: the importance
of social skills. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto).
2 Shdaifat EA, Manaf MRA. Quality of
life of caregivers and patients undergoing
haemodialysis at Ministry of Health,
Jordan. International Journal of Applied
Science and Technology. 2012;2:78-85.
3 Mousavi SS, Soleimani A, Mousavi MB.
Epidemiology of end-stage renal disease
in Iran: a review article. Saudi Journal
of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation.
4 Lynch SH, Shuster G, Lobo ML. The
family caregiver experience–examining
the positive and negative aspects of
compassion satisfaction and compassion
fatigue as caregiving outcomes. Aging &
Mental Health. 2018;22:1424-31.
5 Al Wakeel JS, Bayoumi MM. Caregiver
Burden among Peritoneal Dialysis and
Hemodialysis Family in Saudi Arabia.
Kuwait Medical Journal. 2016;48:197-201.
6 Jadhav BS, Dhavale HS, Dere SS,
Dadarwala DD. Psychiatric morbidity,
quality of life and caregiver burden
in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Medical Journal of Dr DY Patil
7 Ebadi A, Sajadi SA, Moradian ST, Akbari
R. Suspended Life Pattern: A Qualitative
Study on Personal Life Among Family
Caregivers of Hemodialysis Patients
in Iran. International Quarterly
of Community Health Education.
8 Rabiei L, Eslami AA, Abedi H, et al.
Caring in an atmosphere of uncertainty:
perspectives and experiences of caregivers
of peoples undergoing haemodialysis in
Iran. Scandinavian Journal of Caring
9 Macedo EC, Silva LRd, Paiva MS,
Ramos MNP. Burden and quality of life
of mothers of children and adolescents
with chronic illnesses: an integrative
review. Revista Latino-Americana de
10 Theofilou P. Quality of Life: Definition
and Measurement. Europe’s Journal of
11 Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER.
Measurement in nursing and health
research. 4th ed. US: Springer Publishing
12 Ayre C, Scally AJ. Critical values
for Lawshe’s content validity ratio:
revisiting the original methods of
calculation. Measurement and Evaluation
in Counseling and Development.
13 Ebadi A, Zarshenas L, Rakhshan M, et al.
Principles of Scale Development in Health
Science. 1st ed. Tehran: Jame-e-Negar;
2017. [In Persian]
14 Reichenheim ME, Hökerberg YHM,
Moraes CL. Assessing construct structural
validity of epidemiological measurement
tools: a seven-step roadmap. Cadernos de
Saude Publica. 2014;30:927-39.
15 Lins-Kusterer L, Valdelamar J, Aguiar
CVN, et al. Validity and reliability of
the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey
questionnaire version 2 among people
living with HIV in Brazil. Brazilian
Journal of Infectious Diseases.
16 Lang L, Zhang L, Zhang P, et al.
Evaluating the reliability and validity of
SF-8 with a large representative sample
of urban Chinese. Health and Quality of
Life Outcomes. 2018;16:55.
17 Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA,
et al. Best practices for developing and
validating scales for health, social, and
behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers
in Public Health. 2018;6:149.
18 Wu CY, Chuang LL, Lin KC, et al.
Responsiveness, minimal detectable
change, and minimal clinically important
difference of the Nottingham Extended
Activities of Daily Living Scale in
patients with improved performance
after stroke rehabilitation. Archives of
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
19 Polit DF. Assessing measurement in
health: Beyond reliability and validity.
International Journal of Nursing Studies.
20 Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et
al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing
the methodological quality of studies
on measurement properties of health
status measurement instruments: an
international Delphi study. Quality of Life
21 Wright A, Hannon J, Hegedus EJ,
Kavchak AE. Clinimetrics corner: a closer
look at the minimal clinically important
difference (MCID). Journal of Manual &
Manipulative Therapy. 2012;20:160-6.
22 Ebadi A, Taghizadeh Z, Montazeri
A, et al. Translation, development and
psychometric properties of health related
measures-Part 2:construct validity,
reliability and responsiveness. Journal of
the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences
Research. 2017;16:445-55. [In Persian]
23 Lim CR, Harris K, Dawson J, et al. Floor
and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis
of the NHS PROMs data set. BMJ Open.
24 Yekaninejad MS, Mohammadi Zeidi I,
Akaberi A, et al. Validity and reliability
of the kidney disease quality of life-short
form (KDQOL-SFTM 1.3) in iranian
patients. Journal of North Khorasan
University of Medical Sciences.
2012;4:261-73. [In Persian]
25 Dong Y, Peng CYJ. Principled missing data
methods for researchers. SpringerPlus.
26 Kang H. The prevention and handling
of the missing data. Korean Journal of
27 Malhotra M, Chebiyan S. Posttraumatic
growth: Positive changes following
adversity-an overview. International
Journal of Psychology and Behavioral
28 Nouzari R, Najafi SS, Momennasab M.
Post-Traumatic Growth among Family
Caregivers of Cancer Patients and Its
Association with Social Support and Hope.
International Journal of Community Based
Nursing and Midwifery. 2019;7:319-28.
29 Senmar M, Rafiei H, Yousefi F, et al.
Caregiver burden among family caregivers
of older patients receiving hemodialysis
and its relevant factors. Journal of
30 Valizadeh L, Joonbakhsh F, Pashaee
S. Determinants of care giving burden
in parents of child with cancer at
Tabriz children medical and training
center. Journal of Clinical Nursing and
Midwifery. 2014;3:13-20. [In Persian]
31 Starks SA, Graff JC, Wicks MN. Factors
Associated With Quality of Life of
Family Caregivers of Dialysis Recipients.
Western Journal of Nursing Research.
32 Nortey ST, Aryeetey GC, Aikins M, et al.
Economic burden of family caregiving for
elderly population in southern Ghana: the
case of a peri-urban district. International
Journal for Equity in Health. 2017;16:16.
33 Fukui C, Sakka M, Amiya RM, et al.
Validation of family conflict scales
for family caregivers of persons with
dementia in long-term care facilities
and exploration of family conflicts and
support. International Psychogeriatrics.
34 Pharr JR, Dodge Francis C, Terry C,
Clark MC. Culture, Caregiving, and
Health: Exploring the Influence of
Culture on Family Caregiver Experiences.
International Scholary Research Notices
Public Health. 2014;2014.
35 Alnazly E, Samara N. The burdens on
caregivers of patients above 65 years old
receiving hemodialysis: A qualitative
study. Health Care: Current Reviews.
36 Joseph S, Becker S, Elwick H, Silburn R.
Adult carers quality of life questionnaire
(AC-QoL): development of an evidencebased
tool. Mental Health Review Journal.
37 Hoang VL, Green T, Bonner A. Informal
caregivers’ experiences of caring for
people receiving dialysis: A mixedmethods
systematic review. Journal of
Renal Care. 2018;44:82-95.
38 Salehitali S, Ahmadi F, Noorian K, Zarea
K. Progressive exhaustion: A qualitative
study on the experiences of Iranian family
caregivers regarding patients undergoing
hemodialysis. International Journal of
Nursing Sciences. 2018;5:193-200.
39 Weiss DM, Northouse LL, Duffy SA, et
al. Qualitative Analysis of the Experience
of Mental Fatigue of Family Caregivers
of Patients With Cancer in Phase I Trials.
Oncology Nursing Forum. 2016:153-60
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,019
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,245