پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,089 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,995 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 26,430,544 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,285,299 |
Morphological Evaluation of Maxillary Premolar Canals in Iranian Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study | ||
| Journal of Dentistry | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 21، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 68، آذر 2020، صفحه 215-224 اصل مقاله (444.35 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2020.82299.1011 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Bahar Asheghi1؛ Nariman Momtahan2؛ Safoura Sahebi* 1؛ Maryam Zangooei Booshehri3 | ||
| 1Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 2Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 3Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Statement of the Problem: Considering the vastness of our country, there is a need to study the number of roots and morphology of the maxillary premolar canals teeth in the south of the country. The knowledge of root morphology com influence the outcome of root canal therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate of number and morphology of maxillary second premolars in south Iranian population. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the morphology of maxillary premolar canals in Iranian population by analyzing cone-beam computed tomography scans. Materials and Method: This cross-sectional retrospective study consisted of CBCT (cone-beam computed tomography) of 280 patients over 16 years of age. Maxillary premolars’ position, number of roots, and root morphology were inspected. The root canal configurations of maxillary premolar teeth were also analyzed according to the Vertucci classification. Chi-square test was performed among canal configurations, tooth position and gender. Significance level was set at P⩽0.05. Results: In the present study, of 462 maxillary first premolars, 8 (1.73%) teeth had three roots, 222 (48.05%) teeth had two roots, and 232 (50.22%) were single-rooted. In the second maxillary premolar group, of 400 premolars, 2 (0.5%) teeth had three roots, 34 (8.5%) teeth were two-rooted, and 364 (91%) were single-rooted. The most root canal configurations were type IV (71.64%) and type I (63%) in maxillary first and second premolars, respectively. Among females, single rooted premolars were the most prevalent (56.83%), and among males, two-rooted premolars were the most prevalent (57.61%). Conclusion: This study can provide guidance to the root canals of maxillary premolar teeth for Iranian subpopulation leading to more optimal diagnosis and treatment planning for the endodontists. According to the findings, the complexity of root canal system and the number of roots were less observed in females compared to males. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Cone-Beam Computed Tomography؛ Maxillary premolar؛ Root morphology؛ Iranian population | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Jayasimha Raj U, Mylswamy S. Root canal morphology of maxillary second premolars in an Indian population. J Conserv Dent. 2010; 13: 148–1451. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Iqbal A. The Factors Responsible for Endodontic Treatment Failure in the Permanent Dentitions of the Patients Reported to the College of Dentistry, the University of Aljouf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10: ZC146–ZC148. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Carns EJ, Skidmore AE. Configurations and deviations of root canals of maxillary first premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973; 36: 880–886. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. England MC Jr, Hartwell GR, Lance JR. Detection and treatment of multiple canals in mandibular premolars. J Endod. 1991; 17: 174–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Loh HS. Root morphology of the maxillary first premolar in Singaporeans. Aust Dent J. 1998; 43: 399–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L. Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod. 1986; 12: 343–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Abella F, Teixidó LM, Patel S, Sosa F, Duran-Sindreu F, Roig M. Cone-beam Computed Tomography Analysis of the Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary First and Second Premolars in a Spanish Population. J Endod. 2015; 41: 1241–1247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Vertucci FJ, Gegauff A. Root canal morphology of the maxillary first premolar. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979; 99: 194–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Kartal N, Ozçelik B, Cimilli H. Root canal morphology of maxillary premolars. J Endod. 1998; 24: 417–419. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, Subbarao CV. Root and canal morphology of Indian maxillary premolars by a modified root canal staining technique. Odontology. 2011; 99: 18–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PM. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 996–1003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Bellizzi R, Hartwell G. Radiographic evaluation of root canal anatomy of in vivo endodontically treated maxillary premolars. J Endod. 1985; 11: 37–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Vertucci F, Seelig A, Gillis R. Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second premolar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974; 38: 456–464. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Bulut DG, Kose E, Ozcan G, Sekerci AE, Canger EM, Sisman Y. Evaluation of root morphology and root canal configuration of premolars in the Turkish individuals using cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent. 2015; 9: 551–557. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Nikolić M, Mitić A, Gašić J, Popović J, Barac R, Dačić S, et al. First premolar variations in number of roots, root canals and tooth length. Glasnik Antropološkog društva Srbije. 2014; 49: 37–41. [Google Scholar]
16. Grover C, Shetty N. Methods to study root canal morphology: A review. Endodontic Practice Today [Google Scholar]
17. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review. J Endod. 2006; 32: 813–821. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod. 2007; 33: 1121–1132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod. 2010; 36: 1547–1551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Domark JD, Hatton JF, Benison RP, Hildebolt CF. An ex vivo comparison of digital radiography and cone-beam and micro computed tomography in the detection of the number of canals in the mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars. J Endod. 2013; 39: 901–905. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. De Toubes KM, Côrtes MI, Valadares MA, Fonseca LC, Nunes E, Silveira FF. Comparative analysis of accessory mesial canal identification in mandibular first molars by using four different diagnostic methods. J Endod. 2012; 38: 436–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Plotino G, Tocci L, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Messineo D, Ciotti M, et al. Symmetry of root and root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular molars in a white population: a cone-beam computed tomography study in vivo. J Endod. 2013; 39: 1545–1548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004; 30: 391–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Martins JNR, Marques D, Francisco H, Caramês J. Gender influence on the number of roots and root canal system configuration in human permanent teeth of a Portuguese subpopulation. Quintessence Int. 2018; 49: 103–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Shi ZY, Hu N, Shi XW, Dong XX, Ou L, Cao JK. Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary Premolars among the Elderly. Chin Med J (Engl) 2017; 130: 2999–3000. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Guo J, Vahidnia A, Sedghizadeh P, Enciso R. Evaluation of root and canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molars in a North American population by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2014; 40: 635–639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Tofangchiha M, Bolbolian M, Ghasemi A. Evaluation of Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary First Premolars Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Journal of Mashhad Dental School. 2018; 42: 31–40. [Google Scholar]
28. Ketabi M, Mahabadi M, Esfahanian V. Evaluation of Root morphology of maxillary first premolars. Journal of Isfahan Dental School. 2008; 4: 162–169. [Google Scholar]
29. Ghate AR, Habibi Ardakani F, Tabrizizadeh M, Malek Sabet M. Investigating the Prevalence of Extracted Maxillary First Premolars with Three Root Canals in Yazd in 2009. YJDR. 2014; 2: 92–99. [Google Scholar]
30. Moshfeghi M, Sajadi SS, Sajadi S, Shahbazian M. Conventional versus digital radiography in detecting root canal type in maxillary premolars: an in vitro study. J Dent (Tehran) 2013; 10: 74–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Pécora JD, Saquy PC, Sousa Neto MD, Woelfel JB. Root form and canal anatomy of maxillary first premolars. Braz Dent J. 1992; 2: 87–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984; 58: 589–599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod. 2008; 34: 87–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Celikten B, Orhan K, Aksoy U, Tufenkci P, Kalender A, Basmaci F, et al. Cone-beam CT evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish Cypriot population. BDJ Open. 2016; 2:15006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Al-Dahman Y, Alnassar F, Al-Jebaly A, Alsubait S. Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary Premolars in a Saudi Population. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:8170620. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Popović M, Papić M, Acović A, Živanović S, Kanjevac T. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root number and root canal configuration of premolars in Serbian population. Medicinski pregled. 2018; 71: 100–107. [Google Scholar]
37. Nazeer MR, Khan FR, Ghafoor R. Evaluation of root morphology and canal configuration of Maxillary Premolars in a sample of Pakistani population by using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018; 68: 423–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Lipski M, Wozniak K, Lagocka R, Tomasik M. Root and canal morphology of the first human maxillary premolar. Durham Anthropol J. 2005; 12: 2–3. [Google Scholar]
39. Ok E, Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Aglarci OS, Çolak M, Güngör E. A cone-beam computed tomography study of root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish population. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014; 72: 701–706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Yang L, Chen X, Tian C, Han T, Wang Y. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root canal morphology and locate root canal orifices of maxillary second premolars in a Chinese subpopulation. J Endod. 2014; 40: 630–634. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Partovi M, Mozafari SF. Root canal morphology of human maxillary second premolar. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences. 2005; 7: 34–36. [Google Scholar]
42. Calişkan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetçioğlu F, Türkün M, Tuncer SS. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod. 1995; 21: 200–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Awawdeh L, Abdullah H, Al-Qudah A. Root form and canal morphology of Jordanian maxillary first premolars. J Endod. 2008; 34: 956–961. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972; 33: 101–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Felsypremila G, Vinothkumar TS, Kandaswamy D. Anatomic symmetry of root and root canal morphology of posterior teeth in Indian subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Eur J Dent. 2015; 9: 500–507. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,090 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,482 |
||
