تعداد نشریات | 20 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,149 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,416,347 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,292,301 |
Removal of heavy metals from oil refinery effluent by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) | ||
Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 6، شماره 3، مهر 2018، صفحه 123-129 اصل مقاله (1.08 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jhsss.2019.82259.1015 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Fallah Hashemi1؛ Hassan Hashemi* 2؛ Mansooreh Dehghani2؛ Mohammad Hoseini2 | ||
11. MSc of Environmental Health Engineering, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Student research committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
22. Research Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Introduction: One of the major pollutants in the environment is heavy metals. The stability of heavy metals in the environment has created a lot of problems. Refinery effluents are one of the most important sources of heavy metals and should be treated before being discharged into the environment. Methods: This interventional experimental study aimed to remove heavy metals from petroleum effluent by using the micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) at Kermanshah Oil Refinery. Since ultrafiltration membranes alone cannot remove the heavy metals, surface active agents, such as surfactants, are injected into the effluent. Surfactant monomers in reaction to metal ions creating a complex that cannot cross the ultrafiltration membrane. Heavy metals are removed from the effluent stream. In the present study, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) as surfactant was used to add the effluent to improve the process of heavy metal removal. Result: The results showed that heavy metals such as nickel, lead, cadmium and chromium decreased by 96%, 95%, 92% and 86%, respectively. In the inlet effluent with increasing pH, the efficiency of the processes for metal removal increased, so that at pH = 10, the highest removal efficiency was observed. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the use of membrane processes as a practical and efficient method in industrial wastewater treatment can be applied in various industries, especially refinery ones. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Heavy metals removal؛ Oil refinery؛ Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF)؛ Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate؛ Effluent | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Ali H, Khan E, Ilahi I. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology of Hazardous Heavy Metals: Environmental Persistence, Toxicity, and Bioaccumulation. Journal of Chemistry. 2019;2019. 2. Khan F, Rahman A, Jan A, Riaz M. Toxic and trace metals (Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu, Mn, Ni, Co and Cr) in dust, dustfall/soil. JOURNAL-CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF PAKISTAN. 2004;26:453-6. 3. Merian E. Introduction on environmental chemistry and global cycles of chromium, nickel, cobalt beryllium, arsenic, cadmium and selenium, and their derivatives. 1984. 4. Kadirvelu K, Thamaraiselvi K, Namasivayam C. Removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from an agricultural solid waste. Bioresource technology. 2001;76(1):63-5. 5. Huang Y, Miao YE, Liu T. Electrospun fibrous membranes for efficient heavy metal removal. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2014;131(19). 6. Lakherwal D. Adsorption of heavy metals: a review. International journal of environmental research and development. 2014;4(1):41-8. 7. Babel S, Kurniawan TA. Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2003;97(1):219-43. 8. Marcus A, Ekpete O. Impact of Discharged Process Wastewater from an Oil Refinery on the Physicochemical Quality of a Receiving Waterbody in Rivers State, Nigeria2014. 9. Bazrafshan E, Mohammadi L, Ansari-Moghaddam A, Mahvi A. Heavy metals removal from aqueous environments by electrocoagulation process- a systematic review2015. 74 p. 10. Srivastava N, B Majumder C. Novel biofiltration methods for the treatment of heavy metals from industrial wastewater2008. 1-8 p. 11. Fu F, Wang Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. Journal of environmental management. 2011;92(3):407-18. 12. Rao L, Hayat K, Lv Y, Karangwa E, Xia S, Jia C, et al. Effect of ultrafiltration and fining adsorbents on the clarification of green tea. Journal of Food Engineering. 2011;102(4):321-6. 13. Smith L. Contaminants and remedial options at selected metal-contaminated sites. Technical resource report. Battelle, Columbus, OH (United States); 1995. 14. Gunatilake S. Methods of removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Methods. 2015;1(1). 15. Dermont G, Bergeron M, Mercier G, Richer-Laflèche M. Metal-contaminated soils: remediation practices and treatment technologies. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management. 2008;12(3):188-209. 16. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration handbook: Technomic Publishing Co. Inc.; 1986. 17. Association APH, Association AWW. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater: American public health association; 1989. 18. Samper E, Rodríguez M, Sentana I, Prats D. Removal of nickel by means of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) using two anionic surfactants. Water, air, and soil pollution. 2010;208(1-4):5-15. 19. Li F, Li X, Jingdong Z, Peng L, Liu C. Removal of organic matter and heavy metals of low concentration from wastewater via micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration: an overview. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2017;52:012077. 20. Li X, He S, Feng C, Zhu Y, Pang Y, Hou J, et al. Non-Competitive and Competitive Adsorption of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Zn2+ Ions onto SDS in Process of Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration. Sustainability. 2018;10:92. 21. Rahmanian B, Pakizeh M, Maskooki A. Optimization of lead removal from aqueous solution by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration process using Box-Behnken design. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2012;29(6):804-11. 22. El Zeftawy MM, Mulligan CN. Use of rhamnolipid to remove heavy metals from wastewater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF). Separation and Purification Technology. 2011;77(1):120-7. 23. Landaburu-Aguirre J, Pongrácz E, Sarpola A, Keiski R. Simultaneous removal of heavy metals from phosphorous rich real wastewaters by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Separation and Purification Technology. 2012;88:130–7. 24. Baek K, Yang J-W. Effect of valences on removal of anionic pollutants using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Desalination. 2004;167:119-25. 25. Ghosh G, Bhattacharya PK. Hexavalent chromium ion removal through micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2006;119(1):45-53. 26. Gzara L, Dhahbi M. Removal of chromate anions by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using cationic surfactants. Desalination. 2001;137(1):241-50. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 930 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,045 |