پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,149 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,415,519 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,291,323 |
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Types of Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles to Deep and Superficial Dentin | ||
| Journal of Dentistry | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 21، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 67، شهریور 2020، صفحه 132-140 اصل مقاله (477 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2019.77762.0 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Farahnaz Sharafeddin1؛ Ali Asghar Alavi1؛ Saba Siabani* 2؛ Mina Safari2 | ||
| 1Dept. of Operative Dentistry, Biomaterials Research Center, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medial Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| 2Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Statement of the Problem: The clinical success of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations depends on the strength of its bonding to dentin, yet the bond strength of nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp) added GIC to dentin needs to be investigated. Purpose: This study aimed to assess if the type of GIC containing nHAp and dentin depth can affect the shear bond strength (SBS). Materials and Method: In this experimental study, 60 freshly extract intact third molars were randomly divided into two main groups of flat occlusal dentin with different cuts as superficial (S): just below the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ) and deep (D): 2mm below DEJ. After conditioning with 20% polyacrylic acid, each group randomly assigned to the tested GIC (n=10) subgroups as 1: Fuji IX Extra+nHAp, 2: Fuji II LC+nHAp and 3: Zirconomer+nHAp. Plastic tubes were placed on the pre-treated surfaces and filled with one of the GIC, then stored in an incubator at 37oC under 100% humidity for 24hr. The specimens were thermocycled at5/55 oC for 500 cycles and subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) test using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). The data analyzed by Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test (p < 0.05). Results: The means of SBS of Fuji II LC+nHAp was significantly higher than Fuji IX+nHAp and Zirconomer+nHAp both in superficial and deep dentin (p < 0.05). The means of SBS of Fuji IX Extra+nHAp and Zirconomer+nHAp subgroups in superficial dentin were higher than deep dentin, this differences was statistically significant (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.009, respectively). Conclusion: It can conclude that SBS was influenced by type of GIC, and depth of dentin. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Glass ionomer cements؛ Hydroxyapatites؛ Nanoparticles؛ Shear strength | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Sharafeddin F, Choobineh MM. Assessment of the Shear Bond Strength between Nanofilled Composite Bonded to Glass-ionomer Cement Using Self-etch Adhesive with Different pHs and Total-Etch Adhesive. J Dent (Shiraz) . 2016; 17: 1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Sharafeddin F, Tondari A, Alavi AA. The Effect of Adding Glass and Polyethylene Fibres on Flexural Strength of Three Types of Glass-Ionomer Cements. Res J Biologic Scien. 2013; 8:66–70. [Google Scholar]
3. Sharafeddin F, Feizi N. Evaluation of the effect of adding micro-hydroxyapatite and nano-hydroxyapatite on the microleakage of conventional and resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cl V restorations. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9: e242–e248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Abdulsamee N, Elkhadem AH. Zirconomer and Zirconomer Improved (White Amalgams): Restorative Materials for the Future. [Review] EC Dent Sci. 2017; 15:134–150. [Google Scholar]
5. Sharafeddin F, Azar MR, Feizi N, Salehi R. Evaluation of Surface Microhardness of Silver and Zirconia Reinforced Glass-ionomers with and without Microhydroxyapatite. JDB. 2017; 4: 454–460. [Google Scholar]
6. Sharafeddin F, Ghaboos SA, Jowkar Z. The effect of short polyethylene fiber with different weight percentages on diametral tensile strength of conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9: e466–e470. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Sharafeddin F, Kowkabi M, Shoale S. Evaluation of the effect of home bleaching agents on surface microhardness of different glass-ionomer cements containing hydroxyapatite. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9: e1075–e1080. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Sharafeddin F, Salehi R, Feizi N. Effect of Dimethyl Sulfoxide on Bond Strength of a Self-Etch Primer and an Etch and Rinse Adhesive to Surface and Deep Dentin. J Dent (Shiraz) . 2016; 17 (3 Suppl): 242–249. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Sharafeddin F, Shoale S, Kowkabi M. Effects of Different Percentages of Microhydroxyapatite on Microhardness of Resin-modified Glass-ionomer and Zirconomer. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9: e805–e811. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Arita K, Lucas ME, Nishino M. The effect of adding hydroxyapatite on the flexural strength of glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater J. 2003; 22: 126–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Garcia-Contreras R, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Contreras-Bulnes R, Sakagami H, Morales-Luckie RA, Nakajima H. Mechanical, antibacterial and bond strength properties of nano-titanium-enriched glass ionomer cement. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015; 23: 321–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Mohammadi Basir M, Ataei M, Rezvani MB, Golkar P. Effect of incorporation of various amounts of nano-sized Hydroxyapatite on the mechanical properties of a resin modified glass ionomer. Shahid Beheshti University Dental Journal. 2013; 30:216–223. [Google Scholar]
13. Sharafeddin F, Karimi S, Jowkar Z. Evaluation of the effect of micro-hydroxyapatite incorporation on the diametral tensile strength of glass ionomer cements. J Conserv Dent. 2019; 22: 266–269. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Alatawi RA, Elsayed NH, Mohamed WS. Influence of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on the properties of glass ionomer cement. J Mater Res Technol. 2019; 8:344–349. [Google Scholar]
15. Barandehfard F, Rad MK, Hosseinnia A, Khoshroo K, Tahriri M, Jazayeri H, et al. The addition of synthesized hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite nanoparticles to a glass-ionomer cement for dental restoration and its effects on mechanical properties. Ceram Int. 2016; 42:17866–17875. [Google Scholar]
16. Tedesco TK, Calvo AF, Domingues GG, Mendes FM, Raggio DP. Bond strength of high-viscosity glass ionomer cements is affected by tubular density and location in dentin? Microsc Microanal. 2015; 21: 849–854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Talip MSAAA, Zakaria ASI, Sockalingam SNM. Comparative evaluation of the effect of a resin modified glass ionomer cement universal adhesive on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer cements. Archives of Orofacial Sciences. 2017; 12: 95–104. [Google Scholar]
18. Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "macro" test methods. Dent Mater. 2010; 26: e38–e49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Jena A, Hegde J. Bond Strength of Light Activated Glass Ionomer with Different Conditioners on Human Dentin. Iint J Scien Tech Res. 2012; 1: 26–29. [Google Scholar]
20. Nujella BP, Choudary MT, Reddy SP, Kumar MK, Gopal T. Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012; 3: 22–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Somani R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ, Sibal GK. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016; 9: 192–196. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Ayar MK, Guven ME. Bond strength of glass carbomer material to enamel and dentin following different surface pretreatments. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017; 13: 1929–1937. [Google Scholar]
23. Poggio C, Beltrami R, Scribante A, Colombo M, Lombardini M. Effects of dentin surface treatments on shear bond strength of glass-ionomer cements. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2014; 5: 15–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Pisanechi E, de Carvalho RCR, Matson E. Shear bond strength of glass ionomer cements to dentin. Effects of dentin depth and type of material activation. Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo . 1997; 11(Suppl):1–7. [Google Scholar]
25. Asafarlal S. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage, Surface Roughness and Hardness of Three Glass Ionomer Cements–Zirconomer, Fujii IX Extra GC and Ketac Molar: An. In Vitro Study. Dentistry . 2017; 7: 427. [Google Scholar]
26. Kim JH, Lee YK, Kim SO, Song JS, Choi BJ, Choi HJ. The effects of nano-sized hydroxyapatite on demineralization resistance and bonding strength in light-cured glass ionomer dental cement. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2010; 37: 24–34. [Google Scholar]
27. Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Moshaverinia M, Roohpour N, Darr JA, Rehman I. Effects of incorporation of hydroxyapatite and fluoroapatite nanobioceramics into conventional glass ionomer cements (GIC) Acta Biomater. 2008; 4: 432–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Khurshid Z, Zafar M, Qasim S, Shahab S, Naseem M, AbuReqaiba A. Advances in Nanotechnology for Restorative Dentistry. Materials (Basel) . 2015; 8: 717–731. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Lucas ME, Arita K, Nishino M. Toughness, bonding and fluoride-release properties of hydroxyapatite-added glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials. 2003; 24: 3787–394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Lin J, Zhu J, Gu X, Wen W, Li Q, Fischer-Brandies H, Wang H, Mehl C. Effects of incorporation of nano-fluorapatite or nano-fluorohydroxyapatite on a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Acta Biomater. 2011; 7: 1346–1353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Ravishankar Y, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17: 420–426. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Lee JJ, Lee YK, Choi BJ, Lee JH, Choi HJ, Son HK, et al. Physical properties of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement modified with micro and nano-hydroxyapatite. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2010; 10: 5270–5276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Sharafeddin F, Moradian M, Motamedi M. Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Methacrylate- and Silorane-based Composite Resin Bonded to Resin-Modified Glass-ionomer Containing Micro- and Nano-hydroxya-patite. J Dent (Shiraz) 2016; 17: 142–148. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Yamakami SA, Ubaldini ALM, Sato F, Medina Neto A, Pascotto RC, Baesso ML. Study of the chemical interaction between a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and dentin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018; 26: e20170384. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Hong HK, Choi KK, Park SH, Park SJ. Micro-shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and resin- based adhesives to dentin. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2003; 28: 314–325. [Google Scholar]
36. Pereira PN, Sano H, Ogata M, Zheng L, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effect of region and dentin perfusion on bond strengths of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent. 2000; 28: 347–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Hoshika S, De Munck J, Sano H, Sidhu SK, Van Meerbeek B. Effect of Conditioning and Aging on the Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Glass-ionomer Cement Bonded to Dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2015; 17: 141–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. El-Askary FS, Nassif MS, Fawzy AS. Shear bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin: effect of smear layer thickness and different dentin conditioners. J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10: 471–479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,180 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,067 |
||
