پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,149 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,415,670 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,291,463 |
Role of Organizational Culture in Acceptance of Technology Among Teachers of Smart Schools Based on the Technology Acceptance Model: A Case Study of High Schools of Karaj City | ||
| Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 10، شماره 2، شهریور 2019، صفحه 46-54 اصل مقاله (430.82 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.5812/ijvlms.90492 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Sayed Abdollah Ghasemtabar* 1؛ Mehdi Arabzadeh2؛ Gholam Hosein Rahimidoost3 | ||
| 1Department of Educational Technology, Tehran, Kharazmi University, Iran. Email: ghasemtabar@khu.ac.ir | ||
| 2Department of Psychology, Tehran, Kharazmi University, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Education, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Acceptance of information technology by teachers of smart schools in which learning-teaching methods are based on information and communication technology is of great importance. Objectives: The present study aimed to identify the role of organizational culture in accepting technology among teachers of smart high schools in Karaj, Iran, based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Methods: The present study was conducted by a correlational method, which was of prediction type. Among 5,630 teachers of smart high schools in Karaj city in the 2018 - 2019 school year, 400 teachers were selected by multistage random cluster sampling method. Organizational culture was measured by Denison’s organizational culture questionnaire (2000). For assessing the acceptance of technology among teachers, a researcher-made questionnaire was used. The questionnaire’s construct validity was confirmed by the confirmatory factor analysis method. The reliability was confirmed by Cronbach’s alpha of 0.86, 0.74, 0.88, 0.73, and 0.81 for the dimensions of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude toward use, intention to use, and actual use, respectively. The data were analyzed by structural equation modeling in AMOS V. 24 software. Results: All the direct and indirect coefficients between the research variables were statistically significant (P < 0.01). This means that organizational culture was effective on acceptance of technology among teachers of smart schools and the recommended conceptual model among teachers of smart schools was valid. Conclusions: The process of the effect of organizational culture on the acceptance of technology and the relationship between the components of the TAM were discussed. Based on the results, all the direct and indirect coefficients between the research variables were statistically significant (P < 0.01), that is, organizational culture was effective on acceptance of technology among smart school teachers, and the proposed conceptual model was reliable among teachers of smart schools. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Organizational Culture؛ Technology Acceptance؛ Smart Schools’ Teachers | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Teo T. Students and teachers’ intention to use technology: Assessing their measurement equivalence and structural invariance. J Educ Comp Res. 2018;57(1):201–25. doi: 10.1177/0735633117749430.
Wong B, Chai CS, Deng F, Qian Y. South china education majors’ epistemological beliefs and their conceptions of the nature of science. Asia-Pac Educ Res. 2010;19(1). doi: 10.3860/taper.v19i1.1512.
Ministry of Education. Smart school instruction form. Frkreno; 2010. Available from: https://www.fekreno.org/.../Shivehnameh_HoshmandSazi_2.pdf.
Luan WS, Teo T. Investigating the technology acceptance among student teachers in Malaysia: An application of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Asia-Pac Educ Res. 2009;18(2). doi: 10.3860/taper.v18i2.1327.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intension and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1st ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley Address;1975.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
Teo T. Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Comput Educ. 2009;52(2):302–12. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006.
Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319. doi: 10.2307/249008.
Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425. doi: 10.2307/30036540.
Tsai YR. Applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) to explore the effects of a course management system (CMS)-assisted efl writing instruction. CALICO J. 2014;32(1):153–71. doi: 10.1558/calico.v32i1.25961.
Ghanbari S, Karimi I. [The effect of information technology and communication training for effective adoption of IT based technology acceptance model (TAM)]. Public Adm Perspect. Persian.
Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
Venkatesh V, Morris MG. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q. 2000;24(1):115. doi: 10.2307/3250981.
Akinbobola OI, Adeleke AA. External variables as antecedents of users perception in virtual library usage. Interdiscip J Inf Knowl Manage. 2016;11:73–87. doi: 10.28945/3450.
Denison DR. Organizational culture: Can it be a key lever for driving organizational change? In: Cooper CL CSEP, editor. The international handbook of organizational culture and climate. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. p. 347–76.
Denison D, Lief C,Ward JL. Culture in family-owned enterprises: Recognizing and leveraging unique strengths. Fam Bus Rev. 2016;17(1):61–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00004.x.
Zhu C. Organisational culture and technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Technol Pedagogy Educ. 2013;24(1):65–79. doi: 10.1080/1475939x.2013.822414.
Silic M, Back A. Organizational culture impact on acceptance and use of unified communications and collaboration technology in organizations. Measur Bus Excel. 2013;20(1):21–40.
Tabibi S, Farhangi AA, Nasiripour AA, Baradaran Kazemzadeh R, Ebrahimi P. [Assessment the related factors to hospital information system acceptance]. JHPM. 2014;3(1):14–26. Persian.
Kothaneth S. The relationship between organizational culture, usability, and instructional technology acceptance [dissertation]. The VirginiaPolytechnic Institute and State University; 2012.
Ardalan MR, Salimi Q, Rajaeepour S, Molavy H. [A study of relationship between person-organization fit and organizational culture in western Iran state universities (Hamedan, Kermanshah and Kordestan)]. IRPHE. 2008;14(1):97–131. Persian.
Goodarzvand Chegini M, Ismaili S. [The study of organizational culture associated with the adoption of an integrated model for the adoption and use of information technology in hospitals in Rasht]. Payavard Salamat. 2015;9(1):29–42. Persian.
Abbasi Asl M, Zahed Babelan A,Namvar Y. [The study of related factors to guidance school teachers using amount from ICT in Teaching and Learning process]. Education. 2011;13(4):95–106. Persian.
Srite M. Culture as an explanation of technology acceptance differences: An empirical investigation of Chinese and us users. Australasian J Inf Sys. 2006;14(1). doi: 10.3127/ajis.v14i1.4.
Kothaneth S. A pilot study on the cross-cultural acceptance of technology. Proc Hum Fac Ergonomics Soc An Meet. 2010;54(23):1951–5. doi: 10.1177/154193121005402310.
Teo T, Huang F, Hoi CKW. Explicating the influences that explain intention to use technology among English teachers in China. Interact Learn Environ. 2017;26(4):460–75. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2017.1341940.
Teo T, Faruk Ursava¸s O, Bahçekapili E. Efficiency of the technology acceptance model to explain pre-service teachers’ intention to use technology. Campus-Wide Inf Sys. 2011;28(2):93–101. doi: 10.1108/10650741111117798.
Gardner C, Amoroso DL. Development of an instrument to measure the acceptance of Internet technology by consumers. 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, USA. IEEE; 2004. p. 1–10.
Rahimnia F, Alizadeh M. [The study of organizational culture dimensions based on the Denison model for faculties of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad]. Educ Psychol Stud. 2009;35(24):147–70. Persian.
Mortazavi M, Shabani A, Rajaei Pour S, Azarbakhsh AM. [Study of organizational culture of the national library of the Islamic republic based on the Denison model]. NASTINFO. 2014;25(4):24–40. Persian.
Creemers BPM. From school effectiveness and school improvement to effective school improvement: Background, theoretical analysis, and outline of the empirical study. Educ Res Eval. 2010;8(4):343–62. doi: 10.1076/edre.8.4.343.8814.
Flores MA. The impact of school culture and leadership on new teachers’ learning in the workplace. Int J Leadership Educ. 2004;7(4):297–318. doi: 10.1080/1360312042000226918.
Teo T. Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Comput Educ. 2011;57(4):2432–40. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008.
Chien SP, Wu HK, Hsu YS. An investigation of teachers’ beliefs and their use of technology-based assessments. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31:198–210. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.037.
Oye ND, A.Iahad N, Ab.Rahim N. The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians. Educ Inf Technol. 2012;19(1):251–70. doi: 10.1007/s10639-012-9189-9.
Niederhauser DS, Perkmen S. Beyond self-efficacy: Measuring preservice teachers’ instructional technology outcome expectations. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(3):436–42. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.002.
Ifenthaler D, Schweinbenz V. The acceptance of Tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(3):525–34. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.004.
Pynoo B, Devolder P, Tondeur J, van Braak J, Duyck W, Duyck P. Predicting secondary school teachers’ acceptance and use of a digital learning environment: A cross-sectional study. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(1):568–75. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.005.
Zakeri AH, Haji Khajehlu S, Afraei H, Zangui S. [Study of teachers’ attitude towards the application of educational technologies in the teaching process]. Educ Psychol Stud. 2011;6(6):27–46. Persian.
Wong KT, Teo T, Russo S. Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model. Australasian J Educ Technol. 2012;28(7). doi: 10.14742/ajet.796.
Baydas O, Goktas Y. Influential factors on preservice teachers’ intentions to use ICT in future lessons. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;56:170–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.030. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 348 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 518 |
||