پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,093 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,031 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 27,565,296 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,641,792 |
Comparative Evaluation of Antibiotic Residues in Raw Milk Samples by ECLIPS 50 and TWINE SENSOR kits in Sepidan and Beyza, Iran | ||
| Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 6، شماره 2، تیر 2018، صفحه 105-109 اصل مقاله (266.32 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jhsss.2019.83392.1027 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Alireza Mollaei* 1؛ Maryam Hamidian Shirazi2؛ Amir Reza Hamidian Shirazi1 | ||
| 1Department of veterinary, Beyza branch,Islamic Azad University, Beyza, Iran | ||
| 2Student research committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The presence of antibiotic residues in milk and other livestock by products is a health hazard that can endanger the public health. Antibiotics are widely used in animal husbandry to treat bacterial infections. In this industry, antimicrobial drugs are being used for decades; as a result, continuous administration of antibiotics to livestock had led to contamination of industrialized dairy farms. Background: This research was conducted to evaluate antibiotic residues in raw milk samples in Sepidan, using ECLIPS 50 kit and TWINE SENSOR kit. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, one hundred raw cow milk samples were randomly collected from different farms and milk factories in Sepidan and Beyza townships from winter 2017 to spring 2018. The ECLIPS 50 and TWINE SENSOR kits were used to monitor antibiotic residues in milk samples. The data were analyzed employing Chi-square test, using SPSS software version 20. The significance level was considered p <0.05. Results: In total, 100 raw milk samples were collected, of which 60 (60%) were from Beyza and 40 (40%) from Sepidan. A total of 95 samples (95%) were antibiotic-free and 5 (5%) contained antibiotic residual. 5 samples (5%) of ECLIPS 50 kit, 5 samples (5%) of TWINE SENSOR kit were shown to be positive, using both kits. Conclusion: There was no difference between ECLIPS 50 kit and TWINE SENSOR kits in detecting antibiotics residue in raw milk samples. The positive samples in the two sets of kits were identical. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the two types of kits | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Sepidan؛ milk؛ antibiotic residues؛ TWINE SENSOR kit؛ ECLIPS 50 kit | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Mahmoudi R, Norian R, Gajarbeygi PJJQUMS. Survey of antibiotic residues in raw milk samples in Qazvin (2012). 2013;18(1):45-52. 2. Mitchell J, Griffiths M, McEwen S, McNab W, Yee AJJofp. Antimicrobial drug residues in milk and meat: causes, concerns, prevalence, regulations, tests, and test performance. 1998;61(6):742-56. 3. Heringstad B, Klemetsdal G, Ruane JJLPS. Selection for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle: a review with focus on the situation in the Nordic countries. 2000;64(2-3):95-106. 4. Tollefson L, Miller MAJJoAi. Antibiotic use in food animals: controlling the human health impact. 2000;83(2):245-54. 5. FALLAH RA, Mohsenzade M, ASSADPUR H. Determination of gentamicin residues in the raw milk delivered to mashhad pasteurization plant and in the pasteurized milk obtained from the same raw milk. 2006. 6. Beyene TJJVST. Veterinary drug residues in food-animal products: its risk factors and potential effects on public health. 2016;7(1):1-7. 7. McEwen SA, Fedorka-Cray PJJCid. Antimicrobial use and resistance in animals. 2002;34(Supplement_3):S93-S106. 8. Sarkar R, Paul R, Roy D, Thakur I, Ray J, Sau TJ, et al. Rising Levels of Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria: A cause for Concern. 2017;65:107. 9. Berends B, Van Den Bogaard A, Van Knapen F, Snijders JJVQ. Veterinary public health: Human health hazards associated with the administration of antimicrobials to slaughter animals: Part II. An assessment of the risks of resistant bacteria in pigs and pork. 2001;23(1):10-21. 10. Berruga M, Yamaki M, Althaus R, Molina M, Molina AJJofp. Performances of antibiotic screening tests in determining the persistence of penicillin residues in ewe's milk. 2003;66(11):2097-102. 11. Abedi Shirazi KJDt. A survey on antibiotic contamination in milk supplied in Shiraz and its effect on public health. 1984(636). 12. Moghadam MM, Amiri M, Riabi HRA, Riabi HRAJJoc, JCDR dr. Evaluation of Antibiotic Residues in Pasteurized and Raw Milk Distributed in the South of Khorasan-e Razavi Province, Iran. 2016;10(12):FC31. 13. Movassegh MJJoFT, Nut. Detection of antibiotic residue in raw cow milk in Ilikhchi (Southe West Tabriz) in the spring of 2009. 2012;9(3):89-94. 14. Manafi M, Hesari J, RAFAT SA. Monitoring of antibiotic residue in raw and pasteurised milk in East Azerbaijan of Iran by delvotest method. 2011. 15. Ghanavi Z, Mollayi S, Eslami ZJJJoM. Comparison Between the Amount of Penicillin G Residue in Raw and Pasteurized Milk in Iran. 2013;6(7). 16. Mahmoudi R, Asadpour R, Alamoti MP, Golchin A, Kiyani R, Pour RM, et al. Raw cow milk quality: Relationship between antibiotic residue and somatic cell count. 2013;20(6):3347. 17. Mahmoudi R, Amini K, Vahabzade M, Mir H, Vagef RJJoR, Health. Antibiotic residues in raw and pasteurized milk, Iran. 2014;4(4):884-9. 18. Yamaki M, Berruga M, Althaus R, Molina M, Molina AJJods. Occurrence of antibiotic residues in milk from Manchega ewe dairy farms. 2004;87(10):3132-7. 19. Gonzales C, Usher K, Brooks A, Majors RJI, Publication number. Determination of sulfonamides in milk using solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Agilent Technologies, Pharmaceuticals. 2009. 20. Khaskheli M, Malik R, Arain M, Soomro A, Arain HJPJN. Detection of ß-lactam antibiotic residues in market milk. 2008;7(5):682-5. 21. Rama A, Lucatello L, Benetti C, Galina G, Bajraktari DJjof, analysis d. Assessment of antibacterial drug residues in milk for consumption in Kosovo. 2017;25(3):525-32. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 985 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 661 |
||