تعداد نشریات | 20 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,149 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,416,350 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,292,301 |
Simultaneous removal fluoride and nitrate from water in a batch reactor using Al and Fe anodes and Cu, Steel and Graphite cathodes. | ||
Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 6، شماره 2، تیر 2018، صفحه 72-79 اصل مقاله (1.12 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jhsss.2019.83388.1026 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Mohammad Reza Samaei* 1؛ Razieh Ashoori2؛ Abooalfazl Azhdarpoor1؛ Saeed Yousefinejad3 | ||
1PhD, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
2MSc, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
3PhD, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Background: Simultaneous existence of excessive amounts of fluoride and nitrate in drinking water can cause health problems for humans. In this study, simultaneous removal of fluoride and nitrate from aqueous solutions was investigated using a combination of electroreduction and electrocoagulation processes in a batch reactor with different electrodes. Methods: In this study, at first, an optimum electrode was selected. Afterward, the effects of different operating parameters such as the current density (12- 36 mA/cm2), initial pH (5.5-8.5), NaCl concentration (0.5-1.5gr/L), and electrolysis time (15-120 min), ) on the removal of fluoride (initial concentration: 6 mg/L) and nitrate (initial concentration: 150 mg/) were evaluated, respectively. Results: The highest efficiency of the concurrent fluoride and nitrate removal with Al-Cu electrode and in optimal experimental conditions of the current density of 36 mA/cm2, pH of 7, NaCl concentration of 1gr/L, and electrolysis time of 90 minutes was obtained 87.04 and 89.70%, respectively. Conclusion: High catalytic activity of the copper cathode resulted in better performance than other cathodes in the simultaneous removal of fluoride and nitrate. Generally, it can be concluded that the electrochemical process can reduce the levels of fluoride and nitrate to the amounts below the WHO standard limits, 1.5 mg/L and 50 mg/L, respectively. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Electrochemical؛ Water؛ Fluoride؛ Nitrate؛ Removal | ||
مراجع | ||
1 Dehghani M, Omrani R, Zamanian Z, Hashemi H. Determination of DMFT index among 7-11 year-old students and its relation with fluoride in Shiraz drinking water in Iran. 2013
2 Li Y, Jiang Y, Wang T-J, Zhang C, Wang H. Performance of fluoride electrosorption using micropore-dominant activated carbon as an electrode. Separation and Purification Technology. 2017;172:415-21.
3 Umran Tezcan U, Koparal AS, Ogutveren UB, Durucan A. Electrochemical process for the treatment of drinking water. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 2010;19(9):1906-10.
4 Mousny M, Banse X, Wise L, Everett ET, Hancock R, Vieth R, et al. The genetic influence on bone susceptibility to fluoride. Bone. 2006;39(6):1283-9.
5 Alvarez JA, Rezende KMP, Marocho SMS, Alves FBT, Celiberti P, Ciamponi AL. Dental fluorosis: exposure, prevention and management. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2009;1(1):14-8.
6 Ghanim A. Electrocoagulation of fluoride potable water utilizing bipolar electrodes: Statistical analysis and optimization through response surface methodology. International Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2014;4(5):660-75
7. Azhdarpoor A, Radfard M, Rahmatinia M, Hashemi H, Hashemzadeh B, Nabavi S, et al. Data on health risk assessment of fluoride in drinking water in the Khash city of Sistan and Baluchistan province, Iran. Data in brief. 2018;21:1508-13.
8 Tabash TM. Nitrate removal from groundwater using continuous flow electrocoagulation reactor: M. Sc. thesis, The Islamic University-Gaza; 2013.
9 Ansari MH, Parsa JB. Removal of nitrate from water by conducting polyaniline via electrically switching ion exchange method in a dual cell reactor: Optimizing and modeling. Separation and Purification Technology. 2016;169:158-70.
10 Zhu J, Zhao H, Ni J. Fluoride distribution in electrocoagulation defluoridation process. Separation and Purification Technology. 2007;56(2):184-91.
11 Malay DK, Salim AJ. Comparative study of batch adsorption of fluoride using commercial and natural adsorbent. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences. 2011;1(7):68-75.
12 Ghosh D. Removal of Fluoride, Iron and Arsenic from Drinking water using a combination of electrocoagulation and Microfiltration 2009.
13 Dash BP, Chaudhari S. Electrochemical denitrificaton of simulated ground water. Water Research. 2005;39(17):4065-72. 14 Han S-H, Chang I-S. Comparison of Nitrate and Fluoride Removals between Reverse-Osmosis, Nano-Flitration, Electro-Adsorption, Elecero-Coagulation in Small Water Treatment Plants. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2013;14(4):2027-36.
15 Mekonen A, Kumar P, Kumar A. Integrated biological and physiochemical treatment process for nitrate and fluoride removal. Water research. 2001;35(13):3127-36.
16 Han S-H, Chang I-S. Fluoride and nitrate removal in small water treatment plants using electro-coagulation. Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater. 2011;25(5):767-75.
17 Yehya T, Chafi M, Balla W, Vial C, Essadki A, Gourich B. Experimental analysis and modeling of denitrification using electrocoagulation process. Separation and Purification Technology. 2014;132:644-54.
18 Mollah MYA, Schennach R, Parga JR, Cocke DL. Electrocoagulation (EC)—science and applications. Journal of hazardous materials. 2001;84(1):29-41.
19 Hashim KS, Shaw A, Al Khaddar R, Pedrola MO, Phipps D. Defluoridation of drinking water using a new flow column-electrocoagulation reactor (FCER)-Experimental, statistical, and economic approach. Journal of environmental management. 2017;197:80-8.
20 Vasudevan S. Electrochemical Processes for Water Quality Upgradation. International Journal of Waste Resources. 2013;3(2).
21 Garg UK, Sharma C, editors. Electrocoagulation: Promising technology for removal of fluoride from drinking water–a review. Biological Forum-An International Journal; 2016.
22 Thakur LS, Mondal P. Simultaneous arsenic and fluoride removal from synthetic and real groundwater by electrocoagulation process: Parametric and cost evaluation. Journal of environmental management. 2017;190:102-12.
23 Koparal AS, Öğütveren ÜB. Removal of nitrate from water by electroreduction and electrocoagulation. Journal of hazardous materials. 2002;89(1):83-94.
24 Seetharam BN, Brahmaiah T, Basha UI, Murthy H, Kalkur JN. Effect of Operational Parameters on Nitrate Removal from the Simulated Groundwater Using Electrochemical Method International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, 2016; 3(1).
25 Pirsaheb M, Khamutian R, Molok P, Shekoohizade MJ. Survey of nitrate in ground waters of different regions of Iran: a systematic review. The 1th Conference and Exhibition on Environmental Energy and Clean industry.
26 Waikar M, Dhole AA. Reduction of Fluoride from Groundwater by Electrocoagulation using Iron Electrode. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Technology. 2015;2(9):54-7. 27 Ejlali A, Taghipour H, Khashabi E. The study of fluoride level in drinking water in villages of makoo, in 2014. URMIA MEDICAL JOURNAL. 2015;26(9):754-63.
28 Ahmadimarzaleh M, Balideh H, Hosseindoost GR. the concentration of fluoride in drinking water in different cities of iran and Its health effects. The second national conference in environmental pollution and the sustainable development2015.
29 Rezaei M, Nikbakht M, Shakeri A. Geochemistry and sources of fluoride and nitrate contamination of groundwater in Lar area, south Iran. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017;24(18):15471-87.
30 Mahvi A, Naseri S, Mohamadi A, Shekarriz M, Alimohamadi M. Study of nitrate reduction from water using nanosized iron. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment. 2011;4(3):313-20.
31 Jeong J-Y, Song Y-H, Kim J-H, Park J-Y. Simultaneous removal of nitrate, phosphate, and fluoride using a ZVI-packed bed electrolytic cell. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2014;52(4-6):737-43.
32 American Public Health Association A. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA2005. 33 Takdastan A, Tabar SE, Neisi A, Eslami A. Fluoride removal from drinking water by electrocoagulation using iron and aluminum electrodes. Jundishapur Journal of Health Sciences. 2014;6(3).
34 Bouzek K, Paidar M, Sadilkova A, Bergmann H. Electrochemical reduction of nitrate in weakly alkaline solutions. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry. 2001;31(11):1185-93.
35 Emamjomeh MM, Sivakumar M. Denitrification using a monopolar electrocoagulation/flotation (ECF) process. Journal of environmental management. 2009;91(2):516-22.
36 Kim K-J, Baek K, Ji S, Cheong Y, Yim G, Jang A. Study on electrocoagulation parameters (current density, pH, and electrode distance) for removal of fluoride from groundwater. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2016;75(1):45.
37 Vasudevan S, Lakshmi J, Sozhan G. Studies on a Mg‐Al‐Zn Alloy as an Anode for the Removal of Fluoride from Drinking Water in an Electrocoagulation Process. Clean–Soil, Air, Water. 2009;37(4‐5):372-8.
38 Behbahani M, Moghaddam MA, Arami M. Techno-economical evaluation of fluoride removal by electrocoagulation process: Optimization through response surface methodology. Desalination. 2011;271(1-3):209-18.
39 Fan N, Li Z, Zhao L, Wu N, Zhou T. Electrochemical denitrification and kinetics study using Ti/IrO2–TiO2–RuO2 as the anode and Cu/Zn as the cathode. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2013;214:83-90.
40 Pérez G, Ibáñez R, Urtiaga A, Ortiz I. Kinetic study of the simultaneous electrochemical removal of aqueous nitrogen compounds using BDD electrodes. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2012;197:475-82.
41 Kalaruban M, Loganathan P, Kandasamy J, Naidu R, Vigneswaran S. Enhanced removal of nitrate in an integrated electrochemical-adsorption system. Separation and Purification Technology. 2017;189:260-6. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,111 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,120 |