پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,093 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,023 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 27,234,329 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,480,447 |
Prosthetic Rehabilitation of a Nasomaxillary Defect Utilizing a Two-Component Prosthesis: A Clinical Report | ||
| Journal of Dentistry | ||
| مقاله 32، دوره 21، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 68، آذر 2020، صفحه 244-248 اصل مقاله (589.1 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Case Report | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2019.77866. | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mahesh Gandhewar1؛ Tejaswini Bankar2؛ Audrey Selecman3؛ Swati Ahuja* 3 | ||
| 1Dept. of Prosthodontics, ACPM Dental College, Dhule, India | ||
| 2Resident, Dept. of Prosthodontics, ACPM Dental College, Dhule, India | ||
| 3Dept. of Prosthodontics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, India | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Naso-maxillary defects may affect patients’ speech, mastication, swallowing, breathing, quality of life, psychology, and social behaviour. A combination of surgical reconstruction and prosthetic rehabilitation is frequently required torestore optimal function and esthetics. Of particular concern is the size, weight and contour of the prosthesis, as it can drastically affect comfort, retention, masticatory function and ease of insertion and removal. This clinical case report describes the prosthodontic rehabilitation of a partially edentulous patient with a naso-maxillary defect (Aramany’s class VI) with a two-component prosthesisjoined by magnets. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Obturator؛ Nasomaxillary defect؛ Prosthetic rehabilitation | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Hecker DM. Maxillofacial rehabilitation of a large facial defect resulting from an arteriovenous malformation utilizing a two-piece prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 109–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Jain S, Maru K, Shukla J, Vyas A, Pillai R, Jain P. Nasal prosthesis rehabilitation: a case report. JIPS. 2011; 11: 265–269. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Kurunmaki H, Kantola R, Hatamleh MM, Watts, Vallittu PK. A fiber-reinforced composite prosthesis restoring a lateral midfacial defect: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100: 348–352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Block M, Salinas T. Reconstruction of a nasomaxillary defect with traditional and infraorbital zygomaticus implants: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 60: 1362–1366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2006; 35: 219–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom) Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2004; 33: 291–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Hecker DM, Wiens JP, Cowper TR. Can we assess quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer? A preliminary report from the American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88: 344–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Ali MM, Khalifa N, Alhajj MN. Head Face Med. Quality of life and problems associated with obturators of patients with maxillectomies. Head & Face Medicine. 2018;14: 2. doi: 10.1186/s13005-017-0160-2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Brignoni R, Dominici JT. An intraoral-extraoral combination prosthesis using an intermediate framework and magnets: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85: 7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Arigbede AO, Dosumu OO, Shaba OP, Esan TA. Evaluation of speech in patients with partial surgically acquired defects: pre and post prosthetic obturation. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006; 7: 89–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Matsuyama M, Tsukiyama Y, Tomioka M, Koyano K. Clinical assessment of chewing function of obturator prosthesis wearers by objective measurement of masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force. Int J Prosthodont. 2006; 19: 253–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Vero N, Mishra N, Singh BP, Singh K, Jurel SK, Kumar V. Assessment of swallowing and masticatory performance in obturator wearers: a clinical study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015; 7: 8–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Rieger JM, Tang JA, Wolfaardt J, Harris J, Seikaly H. Comparison of speech and aesthetic outcomes in patients with maxillary reconstruction versus maxillary obturators after maxillectomy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 40: 40–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Hatami M, Badrian H, Samanipoor S, Goiato MC. Magnet-retained facial prosthesis combined with maxillary obturator. Case Rep Dent. 2013; 2013: 406–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Salem AA, Shakel EA, Sadakha AA, Kassem EM, Elsegai AA. Evaluation of Zygomatic implant retained obturator in rehabilitation of partial palato-maxillectomy patients. Tanta Dent J. 2015; 12: 35–40. [Google Scholar]
16. Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: classification. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40: 554–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Krishna CH, Babu JK, Fathima T, Reddy GV. Fabrication of a hollow bulb prosthesis for the rehabilitation of an acquired total maxillectomy defect. BMJ Case Rep. bcr2013201400 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,634 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,282 |
||
