پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,093 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,023 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 27,255,060 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,488,335 |
Oro-Antral Fistula Repair With Different Surgical Methods: a Retrospective Analysis of 147 Cases | ||
| Journal of Dentistry | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 20، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 63، شهریور 2019، صفحه 107-112 اصل مقاله (234.21 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2019.44920 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Rasoul Gheisari1؛ Hesam Hosein Zadeh2؛ Saeid Tavanafar* 3 | ||
| 1Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| 2Dental Student, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| 3Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Statement of the Problem: An oro-antral fistula (OAF) creates a passage for oral microbes into maxillary sinus with numerous possible complications.Purpose: This retrospective study evaluates the success of three different surgical techniques of OAF repair.Materials and Method: Records of patients that were treated for OAF repair were retrieved and reviewed. Data recorded were patients’ age, gender, etiology, size, location, duration, and method of repair. According to the surgical technique used to repair the OAF, patients were divided into three groups including buccal flap, palatal flap, and buccal fat pad. All of the patients were locally anesthetized with 2% lidocaine and 1/100000 or 1/80000 epinephrine. Then the edges of the fistula were excised and fistula wall was dissected in a stitched layer by three surgical methods. The three groups were compared concerning the success or failure of surgical technique based on complete closure of OAF after three months postoperatively.Results: 147 patients (116 males and 31 females) with adequate records were included in the study. The surgical methods used in patients were, buccal flap in 59 (40.1%), buccal fat pad in 42 (40.8%), and palatal flap in 28 (19%) individuals. Success rates of these techniques were significantly different. Buccal fat pad was the most successful flap (98.3%), followed by buccal flap (89.8%), and palatal flap (85.7%). The most common cause of OAF in this group of patients was dental extraction.Conclusion: Buccal fat pad flap seems to be one of the best treatments for the closure of OAF lager than 5 mm.Key Words ● Fat Pad ● Maxillary Sinus ● Oroantral Fistula ● Surgical Flaps | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Fat Pad؛ Maxillary Sinus؛ Oroantral Fistula؛ Surgical Flaps | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Killey HC, Kay LW. An analysis of 250 cases of oro-antral fistula treated by the buccal flap operation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1967; 24: 726–739. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Anavi Y, Gal G, Silfen R, Calderon S. Palatal rotation-advancement flap for delayed repair of oroantral fistula: a retrospectiveevaluation of 63 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 96: 527–534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Thoma K, Pajarola GF, Grätz KW, Schmidlin PR. Bioabsorbable root analogue for closure of oroantral communications after toothextraction: a prospective case-cohort study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101: 558–564. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Yalçın S, Oncü B, Emes Y, Atalay B, Aktaş I. Surgical treatment of oroantral fistulas: a clinical study of 23 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 333–339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Kirmeier R, Arnetzl C, Robl T, Payer M, Lorenzoni M, Jakse N. Reproducibility of volumetric measurements on maxillary sinuses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40: 195–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Axhausen G. Zur methodic des vers chlusses von defekenim alveolarforsat oberkiefer. Deutsche Monatschrift fur Zahnheilkunde. 1930; 48: 193–196. [Google Scholar]
7. Killey HC, Kay LW. An analysis of 250 cases of oro-antral fistula treated by the buccal flap operation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1967; 24: 726–739. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. McGregor IA, McGregor FM. Reconstructive techniques in intraoral surgery. In: McGregor FM (Ed) Cancer of the face and mouth 1th ed London: Churchill Livingstone; 1986. pp. 412–419. [Google Scholar]
9. Yamazaki Y, Yamaoka M, Hirayama M, Shimada H. The submucosal island flap in the closure of oro-antral fistula. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985; 23: 259–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Ferrari S, Ferri A, Bianchi B, Copelli C, Magri AS, Sesenna E. A novel technique for cheek mucosa defect reconstruction using a pedicled buccal fatpad and buccinator myomucosal island flap. Oral Oncol. 2009; 45: 59–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Rehrmann A. Eine Methode zur Schliessung von Kieferhöhlenperforationen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Wschr. 1936; 39:1136–1138. [Google Scholar]
12. Kruger GO. Textbook of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 6th ed. Mosby: St Louis; 1984. p. 226. [Google Scholar]
13. Hanazawa Y, Itoh K, Mabashi T, Sato K. Closure of oroantral communications using a pedicled buccal fat pad graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995; 53: 771–775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Nezafati S, Vafaii A, Ghojazadeh M. Comparison of pedicled buccal fat pad flap with buccal flap for closure of oro-antralcommunication. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41: 624–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Abuabara A, Cortez AL, Passeri LA, de Moraes M, Moreira RW. Evaluation of different treatments for oroantral/oronasal communications: experience of 112 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 35: 155–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Dolanmaz D, Tuz H, Bayraktar S, Metin M, Erdem E, Baykul T. Use of pedicled buccal fat pad in the closure of oroantral communication: analysis of 75 cases. Quintessence Int. 2004; 35: 241–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Baumann A, Ewers R. Application of the buccal fat pad in oral reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58: 389–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Poeschl PW, Baumann A, Russmueller G, Poeschl E, Klug C, Ewers R. Closure of oroantral communications with Bichat's buccal fat pad. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67: 1460–1466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. el-Hakim IE, el-Fakharany AM. The use of the pedicled buccal fat pad (BFP) and palatal rotating flaps in closure of oroantral communication and palatal defects. J Laryngol Otol. 1999; 113: 834–838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Rapidis AD, Alexandridis CA, Eleftheriadis E, Angelopoulos AP. The use of the buccal fat pad for reconstruction of oral defects: review of the literature and report of 15 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58: 158–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Abad-Gallegos M, Figueiredo R, Rodríguez-Baeza A, Gay-Escoda C. Use of Bichat's buccal fat pad for the sealing of orosinusal communications. A presentation of 8 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16: e215–e219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Kiran Kumar Krishanappa S, Eachempati P, Kumbargere Nagraj S, Shetty NY, Moe S, Aggarwal H, et al. Interventions for treating oro-antral communications and fistulae due to dental procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 8: CD011784. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Chien CY, Hwang CF, Chuang HC, Jeng SF, Su CY. Comparison of radial forearm free flap, pedicled buccal fat pad flap and split-thicknessskin graft in reconstruction of buccal mucosal defect. Oral Oncol. 2005; 41: 694–697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,550 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 870 |
||