LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,519
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,426,464
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,296,843
Vahdatpour, Babak, Tahmasebi, Ali, Zargham, Mahtab, Emad, Mohamad Reza, Rezaei, Mahnaz. (1398). The Effect of Biofeedback versus Functional Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6(2), 63-67. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2019.75399.
Babak Vahdatpour; Ali Tahmasebi; Mahtab Zargham; Mohamad Reza Emad; Mahnaz Rezaei. "The Effect of Biofeedback versus Functional Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6, 2, 1398, 63-67. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2019.75399.
Vahdatpour, Babak, Tahmasebi, Ali, Zargham, Mahtab, Emad, Mohamad Reza, Rezaei, Mahnaz. (1398). 'The Effect of Biofeedback versus Functional Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6(2), pp. 63-67. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2019.75399.
Vahdatpour, Babak, Tahmasebi, Ali, Zargham, Mahtab, Emad, Mohamad Reza, Rezaei, Mahnaz. The Effect of Biofeedback versus Functional Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1398; 6(2): 63-67. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2019.75399.

The Effect of Biofeedback versus Functional Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research
مقاله 3، دوره 6، شماره 2، شهریور 2019، صفحه 63-67    اصل مقاله (642.95 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jrsr.2019.75399.
نویسندگان
Babak Vahdatpour1؛ Ali Tahmasebi1؛ Mahtab Zargham2؛ Mohamad Reza Emad3؛ Mahnaz Rezaei* 4
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
2Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
3Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
4School of Medicine, Islamic Azad University of Najaf-Abad, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده
Background: Urinary Stress Incontinence (SUI)is the most common type of urinary incontinence among the young and middle-aged women, which occurs due to weak pelvic floor muscles and urethral sphincter in addition to many other factors. The objective of the research was to assess the effect of biofeedback versus functional electrical stimulation in the treatment of SUI.
Methods: In this study, 30 married women affected by SUI were selected randomly. The participants were divided into two equal groups and treated during 15 weeks with 1 session per week. The changes in SUI severity and their satisfaction were assessed by ICIQ-SF Questionnaire, and the rate of urine leakage was measured by applying Pad Test. Data were recorded and analyzed using SPSS Version 19 software. Specifically, Paired t-test, Independent t-test, and Mann-Whitney test were utilized.
Results: The results revealed that the mean quantity of urinary leakage, maximal PFM force, and ICIQ Score did not have significant differences in both groups (p>0.05). However, there was a significant difference between biofeedback and FES group post-treatment regarding the quantity of urinary leakage (p<0.05). Patients in the biofeedback group expressed more satisfaction and improvement than those in the FES group.
Conclusion: Both treatment methods were effective in the treatment of SUI. However, biofeedback proved to be superior  in reducing the quantity of urinary leakage. Further, because of a higher degree of patients’ subjective satisfaction and improvement with biofeedback, this method of treatment is recommended.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Biofeedback؛ Functional Electrical Stimulation؛ Stress Urinary Incontinence
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,675
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,290


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب