| Background: Despite wide application of chromium in electroplating industry, the pulmonary effects of chronic exposure to this chemical have not been extensively studied and are subject of debate and controversy. This study was, therefore, undertaken to further address this issue. Methods: The study population consisted of a group of 15 workers with a history of past and present occupational exposure to chromium mists and 15 unexposed healthy subjects (referent). Subjects were interviewed, respiratory symptom questionnaires were filled out for them, and their parameters of pulmonary function (PFT) were measured during the shift and a few days after exposure ceased. Results: Both groups were similar as to the number of smokers, their length of smoking, and demographic factors such as age, weight and height. Although the unexposed group, on average, were slightly older than their exposed counterparts, statistical analysis of the data revealed that symptoms such as productive cough, phlegm, wheezing and shortness of breath were significantly (P<0.05) more prevalent among the exposed workers. Furthermore, the parameters of pulmonary function (PFT) of the exposed workers, while at work, were significantly lower than those of referent individuals. Interestingly, PFT of the exposed subjects generally showed some improvement a few days after their exposure ceased. However, despite this relative recovery, the differences of PFT values between the exposed and referent groups, from statistical point of view, remained significant. Conclusion: Our data support the proposition that exposure to chromium mists induces abnormal respiratory symptoms as well as both acute, partially reversible and chronic irreversible lung functional impairments. | 
					| 
		Agency for toxic substances and disease Rigistry casestudies in Enviromental Medicine (CSEM) chromiumtoxicity, December 18, 2008.World Health Organization. Chromium (EnvironmentalHealth Criteria 61) International Programme onChemical Safety. Geneva, Switzerland 1990.Dayan AD, Paine AJ. Mechanisms of chromiumtoxicity, carcinogenicity and allergenicity: review ofthe literature from 1985 to 2000. Hum Exp Toxicol; 20(9): 439-51.International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS).Chromium. Environmental Health Criteria 61. WHO.Agency for toxic substances and disease Registry(ATSDR). Agency for toxic substances and diseaseRegistry Toxicological profile for chromium. U.S.Department of Health and Human services, publicHealth services. September 2012.Zober A. Possible dangers to the respiratory tract fromwelding fumer: methods of approach in an industrialhealth care context and results. Schweissen Schneiden; 34 (2): 77-81.(in German).Jindrichova J. chromium damage in arc welders. ZGesamte Hyg 1978; 24(2): 86-8.(in German).Keskinen H, Kalliomaki PL, Alanko K. Occupationalasthma due to stainless steel welding fumes. ClinAllerg 1980; 10: 151-9.Letterer E, Neidhardt K, Klett H. Chromate lungcancer and chromate pneumoconiosis. A clinical,morbid anatomical and industrial-hygiene-relatedstudy. Arch.Gewerbepathol. Gewerbehyg 1944; 12:-61. (in German).Sluis-Cremer GK, Du Toit RS. Pneumoconiosis inchromite miners in South Africa. Br J Ind Med 1968;(1): 63-7.Rastogi SK, Pandey A , Tripathi S. Occupational healthrisks among the workers employed in leather tanneriesat Kanpur. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2008; 12(3):-5.Lindberg E, Hdenstierna G. Chrome plating: Symptoms,findings in upper airways, and effects on lung function.Arch Environ Health 1983; 38: 367-74.Reggiani A, Lotti M, De Rosa E, Saia B. Impairments ofrespiratory functions in subjects exposed to chromium:Note1. Spirographic changes. Lav Um 1973; 25(1): 23-7.Bovet P, Lob M, Gradjiean M. Spirometric Alteration inworkers in chromium electroplating industry. Int ArchOccup Environ Health 1977; 40(1): 25-32.US PHS, Health of workers in chromate producingindustry, Washington DC, US Department of Health,Education and Welfare, US Public Health Service 1953;(192): 131 pp.Hayden SP, Pincock AC, Hayden J, Tyler LE, Cross KW,Bishop HM. Respiratory symptoms and pulmonaryfunction of welders in the engineering industry. Thorax; 39: 442-7.Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen R, Slater T, Cheng S, Fishwick D,Bradshaw L, Kimbell-Dunn M, et al. Two year followup of pulmonary function values among welders inNew Zealand. Occup Environ Med 1999; 56: 328â33.Huvinen M, Utti J, Oksa p, Laippala p. Respiratoryhealth effects of long-term exposure to differentchromium species in stainless steel production. OccupMed 2002; (4): 203-12.Ferris BG. Epidemiology Standardization project. AmRev Respir Dis 1978; 118: 1-120.American thoracic society (ATS) statement snowbirdworkshop on standardization of spirometry. Am RevRespir Dis 1979; 119(5): 831-8.Were FH, Charles Moturi M, Kamau GN, Wafula GA.Respiratory Diseases Due to Occupational Exposureto Nickel and Chromium among Factory Workers inKenya. J Community Med Health Educ 2013; 3: 7.Hamzah NA, Mohd Tamrin SB, Ismail NH. Metal DustExposure and Respiratory Health of Male Steel Workersin Terengganu, Malaysia. Iranian J Publ Health 2014;(3): 154-66 Original.Were FH, Charles Moturi M, Wafula GA. ChromiumExposure and Related Health Effects among TanneryWorkers in Kenya. J Health Pollut 2014; 4(7): 25-35.Hsien-Wen Kuo, Jim-Shoung Lai, Tsai-In Lin. Nasalseptum lesions and lung function in workers exposedto chromic acid in electroplating factories. Int ArchOccup Environ Health 1997; 70: 272-6.Osim EE, Tandayi M, Chinyanga HM, Matarira HT,Mudambo KK, Musabayane CT. Lung function,blood gases, pH and serum electrolytes of small scaleminers exposed to chrome ore dust on the Great Dykein Zimbabwe. Trop Med Int Health 1999; 4(9): 621â8 .Saad-Hussein A, Sharaf NE, Abdel-Shakour A,Hammad SA, Abd-ElGelil KS. Ventilatory Problemsand Cytogenetic Changes in workers occupationallyexposed to chromium. AJCR 2013; 6 (2): 50-7.Sobaszek A, Edme JL, Boulenguez C, Shirali P,Mereau M, Robin H, et al. Respiratory symptoms andpulmonary function among stainless steel welders. JOccup Environ Med 1998; 40(3): 223-9.Antti-Poika M, Hassi J, Pyy L. Respiratory diseasesin arc welders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1977;(3): 225-30.
 |