LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,519
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,426,773
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,296,857
Baleshzar, Ahmad, Tabbodi, Meimanat. (1397). The Relationship of Environmental Architecture with the Level of Job Satisfaction and Productivity among the Employees of Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6(1), 22-27.
Ahmad Baleshzar; Meimanat Tabbodi. "The Relationship of Environmental Architecture with the Level of Job Satisfaction and Productivity among the Employees of Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6, 1, 1397, 22-27.
Baleshzar, Ahmad, Tabbodi, Meimanat. (1397). 'The Relationship of Environmental Architecture with the Level of Job Satisfaction and Productivity among the Employees of Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6(1), pp. 22-27.
Baleshzar, Ahmad, Tabbodi, Meimanat. The Relationship of Environmental Architecture with the Level of Job Satisfaction and Productivity among the Employees of Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1397; 6(1): 22-27.

The Relationship of Environmental Architecture with the Level of Job Satisfaction and Productivity among the Employees of Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch

Health Management & Information Science
مقاله 4، دوره 6، شماره 1، فروردین 2019، صفحه 22-27    اصل مقاله (292.84 K)
نوع مقاله: Articles
نویسندگان
Ahmad Baleshzar* ؛ Meimanat Tabbodi
چکیده
Introduction: This study was designed to investigate the relationship of the environmentalarchitecture and job satisfaction with productivity in the staff of Azad universities.Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study, out of a total of 400 employees of the colleges of the Islamic Azad University of Shiraz, 186 subjects were included as a sample group by using MORGAN’s table for sample size. Data were collected using demographic information checklist, staff physical administrative environment questionnaire, Minnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire, and Hersey-Goldsmith’s Productivity Questionnaire. To describe the variables, we used descriptive statistics including mean indexes, and standard deviations. The data were analyzed using SPSS version22. Pearson Correlation Coefficient was used to measure the relationship between quantitative variables and productivity score. The level of significance was p<0.05.Results: The results indicated that the participants were middle aged (41.45±6.8), and hadan average work time of 8 hours each working day and a work record of 11 years. Also, most of them were male and married, and more than 60% of them had a bachelor’s or master’s degree. Overall, the quality of environmental architecture index (mean±standard deviation of 58.04±10.20) had a direct significant correlation with the total productivity score (P=0.001 r=0.63). The environmental architecture index with job satisfaction showed a significant direct relationship (r=0.57 P=0.02).Conclusion: The environmental architecture index with the dimensions of ability, perception,support, and feedback from the dimensions of productivity was related only to the internaldimension of job satisfaction. Regarding the relationship of physical conditions with jobsatisfaction and productivity, it is suggested that the organizations should increase the quality of physical environment in order to improve the productivity of the employee.Keywords: Environment, Architecture, Job satisfaction
مراجع
  1. References
  2. Zakerian SA, Garosi E, Abdi Z, Bakhshi E, Kamrani M, Kalantari R. Studying the influence of workplace design on productivity of bank clerks. Health and Safety at Work. 2016;6(2):3542.
  3. Sukedo N. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nita_Sukdeo/contributions. IEOM Bogota, Columbia. 2017.
  4. Farrahi Buzanjani B, Mahdavi M, Abbasi M.
  5. Factors Affecting on the Job Satisfaction or dissatisfaction of Fava Nazasa personnels. Journal of Human Resource Management. 2010;2(3 &4):101-20. Perian.
  6. BAKHTIAR NH, Rajaeipour S, SALIMI GA, Taherpour F, Partovi M. Relation between the job content and job satisfaction of Isfahan Iron Mill Co. staff members. Journal of Executive Management. 2009;1(33):57-76.
  7. Fattahi R, Qalandari K, Shirzad S. The Relationship between Ergonomic Indicators in the Workplace with Employee Productivity and Job Stress in the General Directorate of Tax Affairs of West Azarbaijan. Journal of Economics and Taxation. 2016;1(1):203-25.
  8. Clements-Croome D, Baizhan L, editors. Productivity and indoor environment. Proceedings of Healthy Buildings; 2000.
  9. Ahmadi M, Zakerian SA, Salmanzadeh H, Mortezapour A. Identification of the Ergonomic
  10. Interventions Goals from the Viewpoint of Ergonomics Experts of Iran using Fuzzy Delphi Method. International Journal of Occupational Hygiene.
  11. ;8(3):151-7.
  12. Osibanjo AO, Abiodun A, Adeniji A. Impact of Job Environment on Job Satisfaction & Commitment among Nigerian Nurses. Journal of
  13. South Africa Business Research. 2014:1-11. DOI: 10.5171/2014.726260doi: 10.5171/2014.726260.
  14. Fadda J. Quality of Healthcare: A Review of the Impact of the Hospital Physical Environment on Improving Quality of Care. New York: Sustainable Building for a Cleaner Environment: Springer; 2019. p. 217-53. doi: 10.1007/978-3-31994595-8_20.
  15. Hameed A, Amjad S. Impact of office design on
  16. employees productivity: a case study of banking organizations of Abbottabad, Pakistan. Journal of Public Affairs Administration and Management. 2009:3(1):1-13.
  17. Azadi R, Eidy H. The effects of job satisfaction and social capital on employees’ performance with the role of organizational commitment mediation (Case Study, staff of the Ministry of Sports and Youth). Organizational Behavioral Management Studies in Sport. 2015; 2(8):11-24.
  18. Shaemi Barzaki A, Mohammadi M. Investigating the Effect of Transformational Leadership on Human Resource Productivity as an Intermediary of Organizational Entrepreneurship. Journal of Research Transformation Management. 2014; 6(12):1-28.
  19. Kasiri M, Kamalzadeh H. Investigating the Factors Affecting Human Resources Productivity Based on the Hersey and Goldsmith Model (Achieve Model) Case Study: Sixth Region Gas Transmission Operations. Journal of Research in Management and Accounting. 2014;509-10.
  20. Leblebici D. Impact of workplace quality on employee’s productivity: case study of a bank in Turkey. Journal of Business Economics and Finance. 2012;1(1):38 49.
  21. Lan L, Lian Z, Pan L. The effects of air temperature on office workers’ well-being, workload and productivity-evaluated with subjective ratings. Appl Ergon. 2010;42(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j. apergo.2010.04.003.
  22. Ramalho-Pires de Almeida MA, Abalos-Medina GM, Villaverde-Gutierrez C, Gomes-de Lucena NM, Ferreira-Tomaz A, Perez-Marmol JM. Effects of an ergonomic program on the quality of life and work performance of university staff with physical disabilities: A clinical trial with threemonth follow-up. Disability and health journal. 2019;12(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.07.002.
  23. Fadda J. Quality of Healthcare: A Review of the
  24. Impact of the Hospital Physical Environment on Improving Quality of Care. New York: Sustainable Building for a Cleaner Environment: Springer; 2019. p. 217-53.doi: 10.1007/978-3-31994595-8_20.
  25. Goetz K, Hasse P, Campbell SM, Berger S, Dorfer CE, Hahn K, et al. Evaluation of job satisfaction and working atmosphere of dental nurses in Germany. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016;44(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12186.
  26. Dervish H. Investigating the Factors Affecting Employees’ Job Satisfaction. Management Culture. 2007;16:117-40.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,855
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 913


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب