LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,125
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,841
Niknam, Fatemeh, Khammarnia, Mohammad, Zand, Farid, Fallahnejad, Elham, Sharifian, Roxana. (1397). Evaluating Physicians and Nurses’ Satisfaction with Computerized Physician Order Entry System in Iran. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5(2), 51-56.
Fatemeh Niknam; Mohammad Khammarnia; Farid Zand; Elham Fallahnejad; Roxana Sharifian. "Evaluating Physicians and Nurses’ Satisfaction with Computerized Physician Order Entry System in Iran". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5, 2, 1397, 51-56.
Niknam, Fatemeh, Khammarnia, Mohammad, Zand, Farid, Fallahnejad, Elham, Sharifian, Roxana. (1397). 'Evaluating Physicians and Nurses’ Satisfaction with Computerized Physician Order Entry System in Iran', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5(2), pp. 51-56.
Niknam, Fatemeh, Khammarnia, Mohammad, Zand, Farid, Fallahnejad, Elham, Sharifian, Roxana. Evaluating Physicians and Nurses’ Satisfaction with Computerized Physician Order Entry System in Iran. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1397; 5(2): 51-56.

Evaluating Physicians and Nurses’ Satisfaction with Computerized Physician Order Entry System in Iran

Health Management & Information Science
مقاله 3، دوره 5، شماره 2، تیر 2018، صفحه 51-56    اصل مقاله (264.93 K)
نوع مقاله: Articles
نویسندگان
Fatemeh Niknam* ؛ Mohammad Khammarnia؛ Farid Zand؛ Elham Fallahnejad؛ Roxana Sharifian
چکیده
Background: An important application in health care system is computerized physicianorder entry system (CPOE) which improves the quality of patient’s care. Given that the users’ satisfaction is necessary in predicting the success of a system, this study aimed to evaluate the satisfaction of CPOE users in Namazi Hospital.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted as a descriptive-analytical research threemonths after CPOE implementation in Namazi Hospital. The study population consisted ofall physicians and nurses in General Intensive care Unit (ICU), which included 14 physiciansand 26 nurses who had been working with CPOE system. A standard questionnaire wasapplied for data gathering; its validity and reliability was confirmed in the study (α=0.84).The data were processed by SPSS 21 software and appropriate statistical tests including T test, One-way Anova and Chi-square tests were used.Results: Overall, the satisfaction of physicians and nurses about the CPOE systems wasmoderate (4.83±1.99). Although the physician’s satisfaction score was 5.30±1.54, which was greater than that of nurses (4.56±2.19), this differences was not significant (P>0.05). Results also showed a significant relationship between the user satisfaction score and age and gender of the participants (P=0.001, P=0.006) respectively.A significant relationship was found between the CPOE user friendliness and age (P=0.05).Conclusion: Overall, there is a relative satisfaction among the physicians and nurses aboutCPOE in Namazi hospital. Hospital managers could accelerate the use of CPOE in hospitals.It is suggested that the challenges of the system should be examined in future studies.Keywords: Evaluation, CPOE, Satisfaction, Hospital
مراجع
  1. Maslove DM, Rizk N, Lowe HJ. Computerized
  2. physician order entry in the critical care
  3. environment: a review of current literature.
  4. J Intensive Care Med. 2011;26(3):165-71. doi:
  5. 1177/0885066610387984
  6. Kuperman GJ, Bobb A, Payne TH, Avery AJ,
  7. Gandhi TK, Burns G, et al. Medication-related
  8. clinical decision support in computerized
  9. provider order entry systems: a review. J Am
  10. Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):29-40. doi: 10.1197/
  11. jamia.M2170
  12. Fumis RR, Costa EL, Martins PS, Pizzo V, Souza
  13. IA, Schettino Gde P. [Is the ICU staff satisfied
  14. with the computerized physician order entry? A
  15. cross-sectional survey study]. Revista Brasileira
  16. de terapia intensiva. 2014;26(1):1-6.
  17. Khajouei R, Wierenga PC, Hasman A, Jaspers
  18. MW. Clinicians satisfaction with CPOE ease
  19. of use and effect on clinicians’ workflow,
  20. efficiency and medication safety. Int J Med
  21. Inform. 2011;80(5):297-309. doi: 10.1016/j.
  22. ijmedinf.2011.02.009
  23. Andel C, Davidow SL, Hollander M, Moreno DA.
  24. The economics of health care quality and medical
  25. errors. J Health Care Finance. 2012;39(1):39-50.
  26. Poon EG, Keohane CA, Yoon CS, Ditmore M,
  27. Bane A, Levtzion-Korach O, et al. Effect of barcode
  28. technology on the safety of medication
  29. administration. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(18):1698-
  30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0907115
  31. Charles K, Cannon M, Hall R, Coustasse A. Can
  32. utilizing a computerized provider order entry
  33. (CPOE) system prevent hospital medical errors
  34. and adverse drug events? Perspectives in Health
  35. Information Management. 2014;11:1b.
  36. Colpaert K, Claus B, Somers A, Vandewoude
  37. K, Robays H, Decruyenaere J. Impact of
  38. computerized physician order entry on
  39. medication prescription errors in the intensive
  40. care unit: a controlled cross-sectional trial. Crit
  41. Care. 2006;10(1):R21. doi: 10.1186/cc3983
  42. Andel C, Davidow SL, Hollander M, Moreno DA.
  43. The economics of health care quality and medical
  44. errors. J Health Care Finance. 2012;39(1):39-50.
  45. Ash JS, Fournier L, Stavri PZ, Dykstra R. Principles
  46. for a successful computerized physician order
  47. entry implementation. AMIA Annual Symposium
  48. proceedings AMIA Symposium. 2003:36-40.
  49. Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G. The measurement of
  50. end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly.
  51. ;12:259-74. doi: 10.2307/248851
  52. Hosseini H, Khajouie R, MiriAliabadi F. A study
  53. on physicians’ attitude toward Computerized
  54. Physician Order Entry system. IHSR. 2015;4:411-
  56. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease
  57. of use, and user acceptance of information
  58. technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13(3):319-40.
  59. doi: 10.2307/249008
  60. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension
  61. of the technology acceptance model: Four
  62. longitudinal field studies. Management
  63. Science. 2000;46(2):186-204. doi: 10.1287/
  64. mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  65. Mathieson K, Peacock E, Chin WW. Extending
  66. the technology acceptance model: the influence
  67. of perceived user resources. ACM SIGMIS
  68. Database: the DATABASE for Advances in
  69. Information Systems. 2001;32(3):86-112. doi:
  70. 1145/506724.506730
  71. Ghobakhloo M, Tang SH. Information system
  72. success among manufacturing SMEs: case of
  73. developing countries. Information Technology
  74. for Development. 2015;21(4):573-600. doi:
  75. 1080/02681102.2014.996201
  76. Lwoga ET. Critical success factors for adoption
  77. of web-based learning management systems
  78. in Tanzania. Int J Educ Dev Using Inf Commun
  79. Technol. 2014;10(1):4.
  80. Chen JV, Rungruengsamrit D, Rajkumar T, Yen
  81. DC. Success of electronic commerce Web sites: A
  82. comparative study in two countries. Information
  83. & Management. 2013;50(6):344-55. doi: 10.1016/j.
  84. im.2013.02.007
  85. Kaewkitipong L, Chen CC, Ractham P. Using
  86. social media to enrich information systems
  87. field trip experiences: Students’ satisfaction and
  88. continuance intentions. Comput Human Behav.
  89. ;63:256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.030
  90. Hoonakker PL, Carayon P, Walker JM.
  91. Measurement of CPOE end-user satisfaction
  92. among ICU physicians and nurses. Appl Clin
  93. Inform. 2010;1(3):268-85. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2010-
  94. -RA-0020
  95. Hoonakker PL, Carayon P, Brown RL, Cartmill
  96. RS, Wetterneck TB, Walker JM. Changes
  97. in end-user satisfaction with Computerized
  98. Provider Order Entry over time among nurses
  99. and providers in intensive care units. J Am Med
  100. Inform Assoc. 2013;20(2):252-9. doi: 10.1136/
  101. amiajnl-2012-001114
  102. Wilson JP, Bulatao PT, Rascati KL. Satisfaction
  103. with a computerized practitioner order-entry
  104. system at two military health care facilities. Am J
  105. Health Syst Pharm. 2000;57(23):2188-95.
  106. Lee F, Teich JM, Spurr CD, Bates DW.
  107. Implementation of physician order entry: user
  108. satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns.
  109. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3(1):42-55. doi:
  110. 1136/jamia.1996.96342648
  111. Niazkhani Z, Pirnejad H, Berg M, Aarts J. The
  112. impact of computerized provider order entry
  113. systems on inpatient clinical workflow: a literature
  114. review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(4):539-
  115. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2419
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,280
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 968


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب