LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,266
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,292,119
Mohammadi, Reza, Nikokalam, Maryam, Bastani, Peivand, Ghalaneh, Sara, Abhari, Shahabeddin, Garavand, Ali. (1397). Citation and Content Analysis of Journal of Health Management and Informatics in 2014-2016. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5(2), 72-77.
Reza Mohammadi; Maryam Nikokalam; Peivand Bastani; Sara Ghalaneh; Shahabeddin Abhari; Ali Garavand. "Citation and Content Analysis of Journal of Health Management and Informatics in 2014-2016". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5, 2, 1397, 72-77.
Mohammadi, Reza, Nikokalam, Maryam, Bastani, Peivand, Ghalaneh, Sara, Abhari, Shahabeddin, Garavand, Ali. (1397). 'Citation and Content Analysis of Journal of Health Management and Informatics in 2014-2016', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5(2), pp. 72-77.
Mohammadi, Reza, Nikokalam, Maryam, Bastani, Peivand, Ghalaneh, Sara, Abhari, Shahabeddin, Garavand, Ali. Citation and Content Analysis of Journal of Health Management and Informatics in 2014-2016. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1397; 5(2): 72-77.

Citation and Content Analysis of Journal of Health Management and Informatics in 2014-2016

Health Management & Information Science
مقاله 6، دوره 5، شماره 2، تیر 2018، صفحه 72-77    اصل مقاله (371.68 K)
نوع مقاله: Short Communication
نویسندگان
Reza Mohammadi* ؛ Maryam Nikokalam؛ Peivand Bastani؛ Sara Ghalaneh؛ Shahabeddin Abhari؛ Ali Garavand
چکیده
Background: The aim of citation and content analysis is to improve the quality of scientificproductions, identify the authors’ trends, etc., and finally provide solutions to improve thepresent status. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the citation and contentstatus of Journal of Health Management and Informatics in 2014 -2016.Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study performed in 2016. The study populationwas all published articles in 2014-2016. Data gathering was done through a self-madechecklist including content (corresponding authors affiliations, type of articles, studymethod, financial support, topics, collaboration rate, etc.) and citation analysis (number ofreferences), language of references, type of references and half life time of references). Data were abstracted and reported based on the research objectives using Excel software v 2007 and descriptive statistics.Results: The results showed that from all 67 papers surveyed, 82.08% of the published articles were original ones, and 98.5% were done through team works. 82.10% of the references were in the English language and 79.17% of them were journal articles. The half-life of the references used by authors was 9.70 years.Conclusion: It is suggested that journal authorities should supervise the resources used bythe authors; they should also provide context for encouraging the authors to publish articlesresulting from research projects and theses.Keywords: Bibliometric, Content analysis, Citation analysis
مراجع
  1. Emerson JD, Colditz GA. Use of statistical
  2. analysis in the New England Journal of Medicine.
  3. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(12):709-13.
  4. Greenfield ML, Rosenberg AL, O’Reilly
  5. M, Shanks AM, Sliwinski MJ, Nauss MD.
  6. The quality of randomized controlled trials
  7. in major anesthesiology journals. Anesth
  8. Analg. 2005;100(6):1759-64. doi: 10.1213/01.
  9. ANE.0000150612.71007.A3
  10. Buttlar L. Information sources in library and
  11. information science doctoral research. Libr Inf
  12. Sci Res. 1999;21(2):227-45. doi: 10.1016/s0740-
  13. (99)00005-5
  14. Rapoport A, Zwick R. Experimental business
  15. research: Economic and Managerial Perspective.
  16. Springer. 2005.
  17. Pincus HA, Henderson B, Blackwood D, Dial
  18. T. Trends in research in two general psychiatric
  19. journals in 1969-1990: research on research. Am
  20. J Psychiatry. 1993;150(1):135-42. doi: 10.1176/
  21. ajp.150.1.135
  22. Marx W, Schier H, Wanitschek M. Citation
  23. analysis using online databases: feasibilities and
  24. shortcomings. Scientometrics. 2001;52(1):59-82.
  25. doi: 10.1023/a:1012798911792
  26. Crockett MT, Browne RF, MacMahon PJ, Lawler
  27. L. 100 classic papers of interventional radiology:
  28. A citation analysis. World J Radiol. 2015;7(4):79-
  29. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i4.79
  30. Heldwein FL, Rhoden EL, Morgentaler A.
  31. Classics of urology: a half century history of
  32. the most frequently cited articles (1955-2009).
  33. Urology. 2010;75(6):1261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.
  34. urology.2009.09.043
  35. Kelly JC, Glynn RW, O’Briain DE, Felle
  36. P, McCabe JP. The 100 classic papers of
  37. orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis.
  38. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(10):1338-43. doi:
  39. 1302/0301-620X.92B10.24867
  40. Yang H, Pan BC. [Citation analysis of National
  41. Journal of Andrology and Asian Journal
  42. of Andrology]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue.
  43. ;12(1):86-8, 92.
  44. Tiew WS. Journal of Natural Rubber Research
  45. -1996: A ten-year bibliometric study. IASLIC
  46. Bulletin. 1998;43(2):49-57.
  47. Alijani R, Karami N, Mohammadi F. Bibliometric
  48. study of “Informology Quarterly”. Journal of
  49. National Studies on Librarianship and Information
  50. Organization. 2010;21(2):75-88. [in Persian]
  51. Lopez-Munoz F, Alamo C, Rubio G, Garcia-
  52. Garcia P, Martin-Agueda B, Cuenca E.
  53. Bibliometric analysis of biomedical publications
  54. on SSRI during 1980-2000. Depress Anxiety.
  55. ;18(2):95-103. doi: 10.1002/da.10121
  56. Sedigh Sarvestani R. Application content analysis
  57. in social sciences. Tehran University Social
  58. Sciences Journal. 1997;80:91-113. [in Persian]
  59. Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook.
  60. New Delhi: Sage; 2002.
  61. Khaleghi N, Latifi L, Nodoushan KA. Citation
  62. Analysis of Articles of the Journal of Qom
  63. University of Medical Sciences during 2007-2013,
  64. Iran. Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal.
  65. ;8(5):74-80.
  66. Afshar M, Abdulmajid Ah, Danesh F. Survey
  67. of citations and authors collaboration rate of
  68. journal of research in medical sciences. Health
  69. Information Management. 2009;6(2):123-32.
  70. Garavand A, Kazemnejad A. Content Analysis
  71. and Collaboration Rate of Published Articles
  72. in Police Medicine Journal during 2012–2016.
  73. Journal of Police Medicine, 2016;5(2):161-9.
  74. Aligol M, Amanollahi A, Farshad A. Citation
  75. and quantitative analysis for articles of scientificresearch
  76. journal of “SALAMAT KAR-E-IRAN”,
  77. Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Iran
  78. Occupational Health. 2011;8:5-13. [in Persian]
  79. Zeraatkar K, AlishanKarami N. Citation and
  80. content analysis of Hormozgan Medical Journal.
  81. Bimonthly Journal of Hormozgan University of
  82. Medical Sciences. 2014;17(1):53-60.
  83. Ghahnaviyeh H, Movahedi F, Yarmohamadian
  84. M, Ajami S. Content and citation analysis of
  85. articles published in the journal of “Health
  86. Information Management”. Health Information
  87. Management 2011;8(1):82-92.
  88. Goldfinch S, Dale T, DeRouen K. Science
  89. from the periphery: Collaboration, networks
  90. and’Periphery Effects’ in the citation of New
  91. Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles,
  92. -2000. Scientometrics. 2003;57(3):321-37.
  93. Batooli Z. Survey on citations and collaboration
  94. rate in Feyz, Journal of Kashan University of
  95. Medical Sciences, from 2002 through 2008.
  96. KAUMS Journal (FEYZ). 2010;14(2):154-62.
  97. Shahraki A, Anbari M. Citation analysis of
  98. article published in the Quarterly Journal of
  99. Zabol University of Medical Sciences and Health
  100. Services (2010-2014). Journal of Zabol University
  101. of Medical Sciences and Health Services.
  102. ;7(2):1-8.
  103. Olatokun WM, Makinde O. Citation analysis
  104. of dissertations submitted to the Department of
  105. Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
  106. Ann Library Inform Studies. 2009;56:117-28.
  107. Kovačić N, Mišak A. Author self-citation
  108. in medical literature. Can Med Assoc J.
  109. ;170(13):1929-30. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040513
  110. Aksnes DW. A macro study of self-citation.
  111. Scientometrics. 2003;56(2):235-46.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,146
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 828


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب