LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,092
تعداد مقالات10,022
تعداد مشاهده مقاله27,178,871
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله7,455,095
Sharifian, Roxana, Shokrpour, Nasrin, Salehpour, Fahimeh. (1393). Evaluation of the implementation of the knowledge management processes in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences teaching hospitals, 2014. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 2(1), 9-13.
Roxana Sharifian; Nasrin Shokrpour; Fahimeh Salehpour. "Evaluation of the implementation of the knowledge management processes in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences teaching hospitals, 2014". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 2, 1, 1393, 9-13.
Sharifian, Roxana, Shokrpour, Nasrin, Salehpour, Fahimeh. (1393). 'Evaluation of the implementation of the knowledge management processes in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences teaching hospitals, 2014', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 2(1), pp. 9-13.
Sharifian, Roxana, Shokrpour, Nasrin, Salehpour, Fahimeh. Evaluation of the implementation of the knowledge management processes in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences teaching hospitals, 2014. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1393; 2(1): 9-13.

Evaluation of the implementation of the knowledge management processes in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences teaching hospitals, 2014

Health Management & Information Science
مقاله 3، دوره 2، شماره 1، فروردین 2015، صفحه 9-13    اصل مقاله (561.45 K)
نوع مقاله: Articles
نویسندگان
Roxana Sharifian* ؛ Nasrin Shokrpour؛ Fahimeh Salehpour
چکیده
Introduction: Recognition and implementation of knowledge management have an important effect on improving the quality of hospital activities. According to the direct relationship with the society’s health, health and treatment departments need knowledgeable and skillful staff. Thus, this research investigated different dimensions of the knowledge management processes in teaching hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2014.Method: This cross-sectional analytical study was performed on 103 top and middle-ranked managers of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences hospitals. The instrument was a valid and reliable questionnaire containing six knowledge management dimensions. Data were analyzed in SPSS software version 16, using the one-sample t-test and ANOVA.Results: The results of the study showed that among the processes of knowledge management dimensions, “acquisition and knowledge creation”(mean=3.2) and “strategy and policy of knowledge” (mean=3.13) had the highest ranks and “assessment and feedback of knowledge” (mean=2.86) and “knowledge sharing” (mean=2.61) were at the lowest levels. The comparison between these six dimensions demonstrated that there were significant relationships among “strategy and policy of knowledge” and “acquisition and knowledge creation” (p=0.047),“strategy and policy of knowledge” and “organizing and documenting of knowledge” (p=0.206), “organizing and documenting of knowledge” and “knowledge sharing” (p=0.259), “organizing and documenting of knowledge” and “use and reuse of knowledge” (p=0.325), “use and reuse of knowledge”, and “knowledge sharing” (p=0.100).Conclusion: According to the results, the conditions of “strategy and policy of knowledge” and “acquisition and knowledge creation” dimensions are at the average level and other dimensions of knowledge management processes are poor in teaching hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Considering the importance of knowledge management in improving the performance of the hospitals and achieving the organizational goals, applying all dimensions of knowledge management especially “knowledge sharing” and “assessment and feedback of knowledge” is vital.Keywords: Knowledge management, Knowledge management dimensions, Health care organizations
مراجع
  1. Walc Z. organization knowledge management structure. The learning organization. 2005;12(4):10.
  2. Naghipour M, Azadeh F, Dargahi H. Assessing organizational culture and organizational structure Applying Knowledge Management in the Central Library University of Medical Sciences in2008. Faculty of Tehran University of Medical Science. 2008;3(2):9.
  3. Moradi G, Assef S. informatiom (knowledge) management. The Journal of Qazvin Univercity of Medical Sciences. 2004;1(8):11.
  4. Chen y. Knowledge management with applications in healh care. Hong kong university journal. 2008;1:96.
  5. Walc z. knowledge management and organization learning. The IT organization. 2008;15(6):9.
  6. Yaghobi m, karimi s, javadi m, nikbakht a. A Correlation Study on Organization Learning and Knowledge Management in Staffs in Selected Hospitals of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. health management. 2010;42(13):13.
  7. Cabrera EF. Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. International Journalof Human Resource Management. 2005;16(3):53.
  8. Momeni m, esfidani m, r, heidari a. the effect of organization factor of combinated heat and power generation. jornal of new market research. 2012;2(2):14.
  9. Mirghafori F, Rhangnejad M, Sadeghi Z. Evaluation of the implementation of knowledge management processes in teaching hospitals. Health management. 2007;2(1):10.
  10. Yu n, chen. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT WITH APPLICATIONS IN HEALTHCARE. journal of knowledge management. 2009;23(2):17.
  11. Ken M. Effectiveness knowledge management in organization action. Minesota University Journal. 2005;33:19.
  12. Khalife M, Salive A. Determine of successful knowledge management programs. Journal of University of Hong Kong. 2003;6(31):12.
  13. Ying y, chang h, min l, chinh chang c. Performance evaluation of knowledge management among hospital employees. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2009;5(24):19.
  14. Guptill J. Knowledge Management in Health Care. Health Care Finance. 2005;31(3).
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,932
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 475


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب