LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,122
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,837
Saboury, Abolfazl, Neshandar Asli, Hamid, Dalili Kajan, Zahra. (1396). The Accuracy of Four Impression-making Techniques in Angulated Implants Based on Vertical Gap. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 18(4), 289-297.
Abolfazl Saboury; Hamid Neshandar Asli; Zahra Dalili Kajan. "The Accuracy of Four Impression-making Techniques in Angulated Implants Based on Vertical Gap". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 18, 4, 1396, 289-297.
Saboury, Abolfazl, Neshandar Asli, Hamid, Dalili Kajan, Zahra. (1396). 'The Accuracy of Four Impression-making Techniques in Angulated Implants Based on Vertical Gap', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 18(4), pp. 289-297.
Saboury, Abolfazl, Neshandar Asli, Hamid, Dalili Kajan, Zahra. The Accuracy of Four Impression-making Techniques in Angulated Implants Based on Vertical Gap. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1396; 18(4): 289-297.

The Accuracy of Four Impression-making Techniques in Angulated Implants Based on Vertical Gap

Journal of Dentistry
مقاله 9، دوره 18، شماره 4، اسفند 2017، صفحه 289-297    اصل مقاله (656.44 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
نویسندگان
Abolfazl Saboury1؛ Hamid Neshandar Asli* 2؛ Zahra Dalili Kajan3
1Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2Dental Sciences Research Center, Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
3Dental Sciences Research Center, Dept. of Radiology, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
چکیده
Statement of the Problem: Precision of the impression taken from implant positions significantly determines accurate fit of implant-supported prostheses. An imprecise impression may produce prosthesis misfit.Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of four impression-making techniques for angulated implants by stereomicroscope through measuring the vertical marginal gaps between the cemented metal framework and the implant analog.Materials and Method: A definitive cast with two 15° mesially angulated implants served as the standard reference for making all the impressions and later for accuracy evaluation. Four groups of five samples were evaluated: (1) closed-tray snap-fit transfer, (2) open-tray nonsplinted impression coping, (3) metal splinted impression coping, and (4) fabricated acrylic resin transfer cap. A gold-palladium framework was fabricated over the angulated implant abutments, the fit of which was used as reference. The gaps between the metal framework and the implant analogs were measured in sample groups. Corresponding means for each technique and the definitive cast were compared by using ANOVA and post hoc tests.Results: The mean marginal gap was 38.16±0µm in definitive cast, 89±19.74µm in group 1, 78.66±20.63µm in group 2, 54.16±24.29µm in group 3, and 55.83± 18.30µm in group 4. ANOVA revealed significant differences between the definitive cast and groups 1 and 2, but not with groups 3 and 4 (p< 0.05).  Conclusion: Vertical gap measurements showed that metal splinted impression coping and fabricated acrylic resin transfer cap techniques produced quite more accurate impressions than closed-tray snap-fit transfer and open-tray nonsplinted impression coping techniques do. The fabricated acrylic resin transfer cap technique seems to be a reliable impression-making method.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,042
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 606


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب