پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,095 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,041 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 28,018,343 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,813,512 |
Influence of Different Bonding Agents and Composite Resins on Fracture Resistance of Reattached Incisal Tooth Fragment | ||
| Journal of Dentistry | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 15، شماره 1، خرداد 2014، صفحه 6-14 اصل مقاله (89.18 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| AR. Davari* 1؛ M. Sadeghi2 | ||
| 1Dept. of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. | ||
| 2Dept. of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Statement of Problem: Reattachment of the fractured tooth fragment should be considered as a conservative treatment and valid alternative to a composite restoration.Purpose: This in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different adhesives and composite resins on fracture resistance of dental fragment reattached to the sectioned incisal edges.Materials and Method: 120 sound human maxillary central incisors were selected under standard conditions and randomly divided into 3 groups, 12 sound teeth were used as a control group and the remaining teeth were assigned to 3 groups (n=36) and each group into three subgroups (n=12). The incisal third of the samples was sectioned using a diamond disk and the respective fragments were then reattached utilizing different intermediate restorative materials, namely: i) adhesive materials alone (OptiBond S or OptiBond XTR or OptiBond All-in-One; ii) Premise flowable composite and iii) Point 4 composite in the one of the mentioned adhesive interface. After storage for two weeks at 37°C and 100% humidity and then thermocycling; shear bond strength (SBS) was recorded in kilogram force (kgf) by applying a load in the middle incisal third with a Zwick Universal Testing Machine at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. Data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD (p< 0.05).Results: The control group had a significantly higher SBS than other groups (p= 0.001); the highest SBS values were obtained using the Premise flowable composite and OptiBond S adhesive (112.44±30.46 MPa); and the lowest with OptiBond All-in-One alone (33.97± 15.63 MPa).Conclusion: Although, none of the tested materials provided fracture resistance similar to that found with the intact maxillary central incisors; utilizing the Premise flowable composite and OptiBond S adhesive improved the SBS of the reattached fragment than other materials. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,398 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 250 |
||