LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,328
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,292,289
Lotfian, Erziyeh, Moossavi, Abdollah, Jalilzade Afshari, Parisa, Bakhshi, Enayatollah. (1397). Translation and Assessment of validity and reliability of Persian version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5(2), 36-40. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2018.41136
Erziyeh Lotfian; Abdollah Moossavi; Parisa Jalilzade Afshari; Enayatollah Bakhshi. "Translation and Assessment of validity and reliability of Persian version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5, 2, 1397, 36-40. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2018.41136
Lotfian, Erziyeh, Moossavi, Abdollah, Jalilzade Afshari, Parisa, Bakhshi, Enayatollah. (1397). 'Translation and Assessment of validity and reliability of Persian version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 5(2), pp. 36-40. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2018.41136
Lotfian, Erziyeh, Moossavi, Abdollah, Jalilzade Afshari, Parisa, Bakhshi, Enayatollah. Translation and Assessment of validity and reliability of Persian version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1397; 5(2): 36-40. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2018.41136

Translation and Assessment of validity and reliability of Persian version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)

Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research
مقاله 2، دوره 5، شماره 2، شهریور 2018، صفحه 36-40    اصل مقاله (529.66 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jrsr.2018.41136
نویسندگان
Erziyeh Lotfian* 1؛ Abdollah Moossavi2؛ Parisa Jalilzade Afshari1؛ Enayatollah Bakhshi
1Department of Audiology, the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Ear, Nose, and throat, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background: The aim of this paper was to prepare the Persian version of the unique International Edition of the self-report Hearing Aids questionnaire and to assess its validity and reliability. This questionnaire was chosen because of its simplicity, comprehensiveness for users, and usefulness, in comparison with other evaluations of outcomes hearing aids. Methods: Permission to translate International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids was obtained from its developer. The questionnaire was translated back into Persian, and then the translated version was retranslated to English by qualified individuals to assess its correspondence with the original version. After this stage, the content validity of the questionnaire was checked by nine audiology experts, with the results analyzed by Lawshe statistical method. In order to examine the structural reliability, the questionnaire was completed by 15 hearing impaired people and the necessary corrections were made according to the results. Finally, the final form was answered by 90 hearing-aid users, with the Cronbach’s alpha statistical method utilized to analyze the results. In order to assess the test-retest reliability, the questionnaire was recompleted again by 30 subjects 1-2 weeks later, with the paired t-test correlation employed to evaluate the results. Results: The mean total score was 26.41 (SD=4.86). The test-retest results revealed no significant difference between the two groups. The internal consistency was 0.845 based on Cronbach’s alpha, indicating acceptable test reliability. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the Persian version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids possesses a good validity and reliability.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Self- report Questionnaire؛ Hearing aid
مراجع
  1. Paulhus DL, Vazire S. The self-report method. Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. 2007;1:224-39.
  2. Serbetcioglu B, Mutlu B, Kırkım G, Uzunoglu S. Results of Factorial Validity and Reliability of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids in Turkish. Journal of International Advanced Otology. 2009;5(1).
  3. Gatehouse S. Glasgow hearing aid benefit profile: derivation and validation of. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10(80):103.
  4. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear and hearing. 1995;16(2):176-86.
  5. Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL scale. Ear and hearing. 1999;20(4):306-20.
  6. Cox R, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, Noble W, Dillon H, Bentler R, et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear and Hearing. 2000;21(4):106S-15S.
  7. Arlinger S. Can we establish internationally equivalent outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation? Ear and hearing. 2000;21(4):97S-9S.
  8. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version: El Inventario International de Resultados para Auxiliares Auditivos (IOI-HA): propiedades psicometricas de la version en ingles. International journal of audiology. 2002;41(1):30-5.
  9. Buriti AKL, Oliveira SHdS. Hearing aid adaptation in users assisted by the Unified Health System. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia. 2012;17(1):41-6.
  10. Cox R, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, Noble W, Dillon H, Bentler R, et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear. 2000;21(4 Suppl):106S-15S.
  11. Paiva SM, Simões JF, Paiva AMD, e Sousa FJC, Bebear J-P. Translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids into Portuguese from Portugal. BMJ open. 2017;7(3):e013784.
  12. Cox RM, Stephens D, Kramer SE. Translations of the International Outcome inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). International journal of audiology. 2002;41(1):3-26.
  13. Barbosa MR, Medeiros DdS, Rossi-Barbosa LAR, Caldeira AP, editors. Self-reported outcomes after hearing aid fitting in Minas Gerais, Brazil. CoDAS; 2015: SciELO Brasil.
  14. Chu H, Cho YS, Park SN, Byun JY, Shin JE, Han GC, et al. Standardization for a Korean Adaptation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids: Study of Validity and Reliability. Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2012;55(1):20-5.
  15. Arlinger S, Nordqvist P, Öberg M. International outcome inventory for hearing aids: Data from a large Swedish quality register database. American journal of audiology. 2017;26(3S):443-50.
  16. Barr C, Quinn S, Williams C. Changes in self-reported outcomes with hearing aids over time. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, The. 2012;32(2):95.
  17. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol. 2002;41(1):30-5.
  18. Heuermann H, Kinkel M, Tchorz J. Comparison of psychometric properties of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) in various studies Comparacion de las propiedades psicometricas del Cuestionario Internacional de Resultados para Auxiliares Auditivos (IOI-HA) en varios estudios. International journal of audiology. 2009.
  19. Kramer SE, Goverts ST, Dreschler WA, Boymans M, Festen JM. International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): results from the Netherlands: El Inventario Internacional de Resultados para Auxiliares Auditivos (IOI-HA): resultados en los Paises Bajos. International Journal of Audiology. 2002;41(1):36-41.
  20. Stephens D. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the Client-oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI): El Inventario Internacional de Resultados para Auxiliares Auditivos (IOI-HA) y su relatiocute; n con la Escala de Mejoria Orientada hacia el Cliente (COSI). International journal of audiology. 2002;41(1):42-7.
  21. Vestergaard MD. Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: Longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction: Resultado auto-reportado en nuevos usuarios de auxiliares auditivos: Tendencia longitudinal y relaciones entre mediciones subjetivas de beneficio y satisfaccion. International journal of audiology. 2006;45(7):382-92.
  22. Meister H, Lausberg I, Kiessling J, von Wedel H, Walger M. Modeling relationships between various domains of hearing aid provision. Audiology and Neurotology. 2003;8(3):153-65.
  23. Dillon H. Hearing aids. Boomerang Press; 2012.
  24. Roshan MF, Fatahi J, Geshani A, Jalaie S. Development, validity and reliability of Persian international outcome inventory for hearing aids questionnaire. Auditory and Vestibular Research. 2017;26(4):240-6.
  25. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education. 2011;2:53.
  26. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham R. Multivariate Data Analysis (ed.): Pearson Prentice Hall. 2010.
  27. Prates LPCS, Iorio MCM. Acclimatization: speech recognition in hearing aid users. Pro-Fono Revista de Atualização Cientifica. 2006;18(3):259-66.
  28. Thunberg Jespersen C, Bille M, Legarth JV. Psychometric properties of a revised Danish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). International journal of audiology. 2014;53(5):302-8.
  29. Gasparin M, Menegotto IH, da Cunha CS. Psychometric properties of the international otcome inventory for hearing AIDS. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2010;76(1):85-90.
  30. Gliem JA, Gliem RR, editors. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales2003: Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,379
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 905


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب