LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,095
تعداد مقالات10,039
تعداد مشاهده مقاله27,955,624
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله7,782,074
Parsaee, Maryam, Noorizadeh Dehkordi, Shohreh, Dadgoo, Mehdi, Akbarfahimi, Malahat. (1393). Impaired Ipsilateral Upper Extremity Dexterity and Its Relationship with Disability in Post-Stroke Right Hemiparesis. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1(3), 47-51. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2014.41054
Maryam Parsaee; Shohreh Noorizadeh Dehkordi; Mehdi Dadgoo; Malahat Akbarfahimi. "Impaired Ipsilateral Upper Extremity Dexterity and Its Relationship with Disability in Post-Stroke Right Hemiparesis". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1, 3, 1393, 47-51. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2014.41054
Parsaee, Maryam, Noorizadeh Dehkordi, Shohreh, Dadgoo, Mehdi, Akbarfahimi, Malahat. (1393). 'Impaired Ipsilateral Upper Extremity Dexterity and Its Relationship with Disability in Post-Stroke Right Hemiparesis', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1(3), pp. 47-51. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2014.41054
Parsaee, Maryam, Noorizadeh Dehkordi, Shohreh, Dadgoo, Mehdi, Akbarfahimi, Malahat. Impaired Ipsilateral Upper Extremity Dexterity and Its Relationship with Disability in Post-Stroke Right Hemiparesis. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1393; 1(3): 47-51. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2014.41054

Impaired Ipsilateral Upper Extremity Dexterity and Its Relationship with Disability in Post-Stroke Right Hemiparesis

Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research
مقاله 1، دوره 1، شماره 3، آذر 2014، صفحه 47-51    اصل مقاله (423.64 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jrsr.2014.41054
نویسندگان
Maryam Parsaee* 1؛ Shohreh Noorizadeh Dehkordi2؛ Mehdi Dadgoo؛ Malahat Akbarfahimi3
1Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences , Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background: The objectives of this study were to compare manual dexterity (gross and fine) and coordination performance of the ipsilateral upper extremity of the right hemisphere stroke patients with the same side of a healthy group, and to determine the relationship of ipsilateral upper extremity dexterity and disability.Methods: In a non-randomized analytical study, 30 individuals with a unilateral first-ever stroke from outpatient rehabilitation clinics and 30 age and sex-matched adults without history of neurological disorders were enrolled. Purdue Pegboard, Box and Block, and Finger to Nose tests were used to measure dexterity (fine and gross) and coordination performance of the stroke group compared with the same hand of the healthy group. The Barthel index was also used to assess disability or dependency of stroke patients in basic activities of daily living.Results: Results showed that stroke individuals with involvement of ipsilateral hand had less coordination and dexterity when compared to the same hand of normal subjects (P=0.001). In addition, the relationship of gross and fine manual dexterity performance of the ipsilateral upper extremity with disability, including dependence in basic activities of daily living, were significant respectively (r=0.376, r= 0.391).Conclusion: People with right stroke had significant ipsilateral upper extremity impairments (manual dexterity and coordination tasks), and this hand dexterity deterioration had an impact on their dependence in basic activities of daily living.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Coordination Impairment؛ Upper exterimity dexterity؛ Post-stroke
مراجع
  1. Jette AM. Toward a common language for function, disability,
  2. and health. Physical Therapy. 2006;86(5):726-34.
  3. Sunderland A, Bowers MP, Sluman SM, Wilcock DJ, Ardron
  4. ME. Impaired dexterity of the ipsilateral hand after stroke and
  5. the relationship to cognitive deficit. Stroke. 1999;30(5):949-55.
  6. Alagesan J, Devi SL, Anandh V. Comparative Study on the
  7. Strength of Ipsilateral Upper Extremity of Stroke Subjects and
  8. Normal Individuals.
  9. Brasil-Neto JP, de Lima ÂC. Sensory deficits in the unaffected
  10. hand of hemiparetic stroke patients. Cognitive and Behavioral
  11. Neurology. 2008;21(4):202.
  12. Debaere F, Van Assche D, Kiekens C, Verschueren S, Swinnen S.
  13. [Without Title]. Experimental brain research. 2001;141(4):519-29.
  14. Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Roy PM, Guay M.
  15. Performance of the ‘unaffected’upper extremity of elderly stroke
  16. patients. Stroke. 1996;27(9):1564-70.
  17. Haaland KY, Harrington DL. Limb-sequencing deficits after left
  18. but not right hemisphere damage. Brain and Cognition. 1994.
  19. Hermsdörfer J, Laimgruber K, Kerkhoff G, Mai N, Goldenberg G.
  20. Effects of unilateral brain damage on grip selection, coordination,
  21. and kinematics of ipsilesional prehension. Experimental brain
  22. research. 1999;128(1):41-51.
  23. Niessen M, Janssen T, Meskers C, Koppe P, Konijnenbelt M,
  24. Veeger DJ. Kinematics of the contralateral and ipsilateral
  25. shoulder: a possible relationship with post-stroke shoulder pain.
  26. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2008;40(6):482-6.
  27. Smutok MA, Grafman J, Salazar AM, Sweeney JK, Jonas BS,
  28. DiRocco PJ. Effects of unilateral brain damage on contralateral
  29. and ipsilateral upper extremity function in hemiplegia. Physical
  30. therapy. 1989;69(3):195-203.
  31. Spaulding S, McPherson J, Strachota E, Kuphal M, Ramponi M.
  32. Jebsen Hand Function Test: performance of the uninvolved hand in
  33. hemiplegia and of right-handed, right and left hemiplegic persons.
  34. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1988;69(6):419.
  35. Sunderland A. Recovery of ipsilateral dexterity after stroke.
  36. Stroke. 2000;31(2):430-3.
  37. Winstein C, Pohl P. Effects of unilateral brain damage on the
  38. control of goal-directed hand movements. Experimental brain
  39. research. 1995;105(1):163-74.
  40. Wyke M. The effects of brain lesions on the performance of
  41. bilateral arm movements. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):33-42.
  42. Yarosh CA, Hoffman DS, Strick PL. Deficits in movements of
  43. the wrist ipsilateral to a stroke in hemiparetic subjects. Journal
  44. of neurophysiology. 2004;92(6):3276-85.
  45. Yelnik A, Bonan I, Debray M, Lo E, Gelbert F, Bussel B. Changes
  46. in the execution of a complex manual task after ipsilateral ischemic
  47. cerebral hemispheric stroke. Archives of physical medicine and
  48. rehabilitation. 1996;77(8):806-10.
  49. York Haaland K, Delaney HD. Motor deficits after left or right
  50. hemisphere damage due to stroke or tumor. Neuropsychologia.
  51. ;19(1):17-27.
  52. O’sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ, Behr DW. Physical rehabilitation:
  53. assessment and treatment: FA Davis; 1994.
  54. Oveisgharan S, Shirani S, Ghorbani A, Soltanzade A, Baghaei
  55. A, Hosseini S, et al. Barthel index in a Middle-East country:
  56. translation, validity and reliability. Cerebrovascular Diseases.
  57. ;22(5-6):350-4.
  58. Wyke M. The effect of brain lesions in the performance of an
  59. arm-hand precision task. Elsevier; 1968. p. 125-34.
  60. Swinnen S, Debaere F, Puttemans V, Vangheluwe S, Kiekens
  61. C. Coordination deficits on the ipsilesional side after unilateral
  62. stroke: the effect of practice on nonisodirectional ipsilateral
  63. coordination. Acta psychologica. 2002;110(2):305-20.
  64. de Groot-Driessen D, van de Sande P, van Heugten C. Speed
  65. of finger tapping as a predictor of functional outcome after
  66. unilateral stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
  67. ;87(1):40.
  68. Yancosek KE, Howell D. A narrative review of dexterity
  69. assessments. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2009;22(3):258-70.
  70. Lend G, Fowkes F. The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire:
  71. an improved version of the WHO/Rose Questionnaire for use
  72. in epidemiological surveys. Journal of clinical epidemiology.
  73. ;45(10):1101-9.
  74. Kimura D, Archibald Y. Motor functions of the left hemisphere.
  75. Brain. 1974;97(2):337-50.
  76. Benton AL. Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: A
  77. clinical manual: Oxford University Press; 1994.
  78. Boller F, Vignolo L. Latent sensory aphasia in hemispheredamaged
  79. patients: An experimental study with the Token Test.
  80. Brain. 1966;89(4):815-30.
  81. katherine Salter JJ, Robert T , Robert Teasell. Evidence-Based
  82. Rewiew of Stroke Rehabilitation : Outcome Measures in Stroke
  83. Rehabilitation. Heart and Stroke Fundation of ONTARIO. 2004.
  84. Taub E, Morris DM, Crago J, King DK, Bowman M, Bryson C,
  85. et al. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Manual. 2011.
  86. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms
  87. for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. The American
  88. Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1985;39(6):386-91.
  89. Tiffin J. Purdue pegboard test. Chicago: Science Research.
  90. :194.
  91. Canning CG, Ada L, O’Dwyer N. Slowness to develop force
  92. contributes to weakness after stroke. Archives of physical
  93. medicine and rehabilitation. 1999;80(1):66-70.
  94. Kim SH, Pohl PS, Luchies CW, Stylianou AP, Won Y. Ipsilateral
  95. deficits of targeted movements after stroke. Archives of physical
  96. medicine and rehabilitation. 2003;84(5):719-24.
  97. Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Dafotakis M, Küst J, Karbe H, Fink
  98. GR. Dexterity is impaired at both hands following unilateral
  99. subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. European Journal of
  100. Neuroscience. 2007;25(10):3173-84.
  101. Meskers CGM, Koppe PA, Janssen TWJ. Kinematic alterations
  102. in the ipsilateral shoulder of patients with hemiplegia due to
  103. stroke. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.
  104. ;84(2):97-105.
  105. Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, et
  106. al. ICF Core Sets for stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.
  107. ;36(0):135-41.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,059
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 348


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب