تعداد نشریات | 20 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,149 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,416,077 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,291,724 |
Factor Structure of the Conflict Tactics Scale 1 | ||
International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 5، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 19، مهر 2017، صفحه 239-247 اصل مقاله (563.33 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original article | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Kaori Baba* 1؛ Fumie Takauma2؛ Katsuhiko Tada3؛ Tomoko Tanaka4؛ Kyoko Sakanashi5؛ Yaeko Kataoka6؛ Toshinori Kitamura7 | ||
1Kitamura Institute of Mental Health Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; and Kitamura “Kokoro” Clinic Mental Health, Tokyo, Japan; and College of Nursing, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan | ||
2Department of Nursing, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan | ||
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization, Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan | ||
4Department of Health, Welfare, and Environment, Aso Health Center, Aso, Japan | ||
5Department of Women’s Health/Mother-Child Nursing, Faculty of Life Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan | ||
6College of Nursing, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan | ||
7Kitamura Institute of Mental Health Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; and Kitamura “Kokoro” Clinic Mental Health, Tokyo, Japan; and Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan; and T. and F. Kitamura Foundation for Studies and Skill Advancement in Mental Health, Inc., Tokyo, Japan | ||
چکیده | ||
Background: The Conflict Tactics Scale 1 (CTS1) is a widely used self-report measure of abusive attitudes of parents towards children. The factor structure of the CTS1 still remains to be clarified. The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Japanese version of the CTS1 for postpartum women in community settings.Method: The data in this study came from the Okayama and Kumamoto’s study. These were part of a larger survey using longitudinal questionnaire studies conducted in Japan from 2001 to 2002 and in 2011, respectively. In both study sites, the participant mothers were asked to fill in the CTS1 one month after delivery when they attended for check-up at the out-patient clinic.Results: A total of 1,150 questionnaires were collected, excluding the participants with missing values in the CTS1. Finally, 1,078 were included in the statistical analyses. Data of 1,078 women were divided into two parts. In the first halved sample (n=578), an exploratory factor analysis was conducted for the CTS1 items after exluding nine items with extremely low prevalence. It revealed 2-factor or 3-factor models. Then, we conducted a model comparison with the second halved sample (n=500), using confirmatory factor analysis. In terms of goodness-of-fit indeces, the 2-factor model was superior. Its subscales were Reasoning and Psycholosical Aggression.Conclusion: The 2-factor model of the CTS1 consisting of Reasoning and Psychological Aggression was superior to the 3-factor model. This is not inconsistent with the original authors’ theoretical model. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Infant؛ Perinatal care؛ Child abuse؛ Factor analysis؛ Psychometric testing | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,294 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,644 |