LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,226
تعداد مقالات11,183
تعداد مشاهده مقاله77,271,909
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله101,509,097
ALIZADEH, MAJID, JAFAR SAMERI, MARYAM. (1404). Intelligent Assessment Systems in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(3), 173-190. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2024.104560.2068
MAJID ALIZADEH; MARYAM JAFAR SAMERI. "Intelligent Assessment Systems in Medical Education: A Systematic Review". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 3, 1404, 173-190. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2024.104560.2068
ALIZADEH, MAJID, JAFAR SAMERI, MARYAM. (1404). 'Intelligent Assessment Systems in Medical Education: A Systematic Review', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(3), pp. 173-190. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2024.104560.2068
ALIZADEH, MAJID, JAFAR SAMERI, MARYAM. Intelligent Assessment Systems in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 13(3): 173-190. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2024.104560.2068

Intelligent Assessment Systems in Medical Education: A Systematic Review

Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
دوره 13، شماره 3، مهر 2025، صفحه 173-190    اصل مقاله (1.43 M)
نوع مقاله: Review article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jamp.2024.104560.2068
نویسندگان
MAJID ALIZADEH1؛ MARYAM JAFAR SAMERI* 2
1Student Research Committee, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2Department of Physiology, Medicine Faculty, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran
چکیده
Introduction: Using Intelligent Assessment Systems (IAS) in medical education has garnered attention as an advanced tool for enhancing educational processes and student evaluation. These systems leverage advanced algorithms to rapidly assess the students’ performance and learning progress. This systematic review aimed to examine the role and impact of Intelligent Assessment Systems in improving educational processes, academic evaluation, and learning progress in medical students compared to traditional assessment methods.
Methods: This study was conducted using the PRISMA framework for reporting systematic review articles. Databases such as Embase, PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Scopus up to March 2024 were reviewed using relevant keywords. Eligible articles were selected and evaluated based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Results: Out of 2741 articles identified, 10 studies were selected for final analysis. This systematic review analyzed 10 studies, demonstrating that interactive assessment systems (IAS) can enhance learning outcomes by up to 40% in certain settings. The findings emphasized the benefits of immediate feedback and reduced instructor workload. The significant role of IAS in enhancing student performance, providing immediate feedback and reducing the workload of instructors was indicated. These systems, through the use of machine learning algorithms and virtual reality simulators, enable more accurate and comprehensive assessment of students’ clinical and cognitive skills.
Conclusion: Intelligent Assessment Systems (IAS) significantly improve educational processes and academic evaluation by providing immediate and precise feedback, enhancing student self-efficacy and self-awareness and reducing the training time and costs. The successful implementation of IAS requires careful system design, user training, and continuous technical support. Further studies are recommended to explore the advantages and challenges of these systems and to optimize their implementation in medical education. The long-term impacts of IAS and scalability across educational contexts require further studies. In conclusion, IAS offers transformative potential in medical education globally, provided that challenges are addressed.

تازه های تحقیق
کلیدواژه‌ها
Educational assessment؛ Assessment؛ Medical education
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Castleberry AN, Medina MS, Persky A, Schlesselman LS. Strategies for Measuring Advances in Pharmacy Student Learning. Am J Pharm Educ. 2022;86(4):8707.
  2. Rolph KE, King A, Lardé H, Kim ST, Ragland N, Claude LPH, et al. Critique of Approaches for Evaluating Teaching and Proposal for a New Institutional Policy. J Vet Med Educ. 2023;50(5):499-507.
  3. Rana AM , Wiggin H, DeGaetano H, Wallace-Ross J, Jacobs RJ. Formative Evaluation of Using Action Learning in a Master of Medical Education Assessment and Measurement Course. Cureus. 2022;14(7):e26523.
  4. Tullo E, Wakeling L, Pearse R, Kheng Khoo T, Teodorczuk A. Lost in translation: how can education about dementia be effectively integrated into medical school contexts? A realist synthesis. BMJ Open. 2023;13(11):e077028.
  5. Liu Y, Chen L, Yao Z. The application of artificial intelligence assistant to deep learning in teachers' teaching and students' learning processes. Front Psychol. 2022;13:929175.
  6. Naseer F, Nasir Khan M, Tahir M, Addas A. Integrating deep learning techniques for personalized learning pathways in higher education. Heliyon. 2024;10(11):e32628.
  7. Yilmaz R, Bakhaidar M, Alsayegh A, Abou Hamdan N, Fazlollahi AM, Tee T, et al. Real-Time multifaceted artificial intelligence vs In-Person instruction in teaching surgical technical skills: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):15130.
  8. Dhopte A, Bagde H. Smart Smile: Revolutionizing Dentistry With Artificial Intelligence. Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e41227.
  9. Maglogiannis I, Trastelis F, Kalogeropoulos M, Khan A, Gallos P, Menychtas A, et al. AI4Work Project: Human-Centric Digital Twin Approaches to Trustworthy AI and Robotics for Improved Working Conditions in Healthcare and Education Sectors. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024;316:1013-7.
  10. Abdellatif H, Al Mushaiqri M, Albalushi H, Al-Zaabi AA, Roychoudhury S, Das S. Teaching, Learning and Assessing Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence: The Road to a Better Future. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):14209.
  11. Lei L, Li J, Li W. Assessing the role of artificial intelligence in the mental healthcare of teachers and students. Soft comput. 2023;28(Suppl 2):499.
  12. Johnson SL. Online Learning Strategies and Practical Tips for Nuclear Medicine Instructors. J Nucl Med Technol. 2021;49(3):269-74.
  13. Rusch L, Manz J, Hercinger M, Oertwich A, McCafferty K. Nurse Preceptor Perceptions of Nursing Student Progress Toward Readiness for Practice. Nurse Educ. 2019;44(1): 34-7.
  14. You X, Li M, Xiao Y, Liu H. The Feedback of the Chinese Learning Diagnosis System for Personalized Learning in Classrooms. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1751.
  15. Cope B, Kalantzis M, Searsmith D. Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2021;53(12):1229-45.
  16. Guilding C, Kelly-Laubscher R, Netere A, Babey AM , Restini C, Cunningham M, et al. Developing an international concept-based curriculum for pharmacology education: The promise of core concepts and concept inventories. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023. Online ahead of print.
  17. Liang JM, Su WCh, Chen YL, Wu ShL, Chen JJ, et al. Smart Interactive Education System Based on Wearable Devices. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(15):3260.
  18. Chatterjee S, Bhattacharjee KK. Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies. 2020;25:3443-63.
  19. Lefroy J, Hawarden A, Gay SP, McKinley RK, Cleland J. Grades in formative workplace-based assessment: a study of what works for whom and why. Med Educ. 2015;49(3):307-20.
  20. Tang Z, Shikama Y, Otani K. Comparison of student self-assessment and teacher assessment of medical interview performance during bedside learning. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2023;69(1):21-8.
  21. de Nooijer J, Schneider F. Verstegen DM. Optimizing collaborative learning in online courses. Clin Teach. 2021;18(1):19-23.
  22. Lim AG, Honey M. Using Technology as a Novel Method to Develop Students' Clinical Reasoning Skills Through Virtual Collaborative Learning in Scriptwriting. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021;284:158-62.
  23. Lucas Ch, Schindel TJ, Saini B, Paslawski T. Game changer: Pharmacy students' perceptions of an educational "Party Hat" game to enhance communication and collaboration skills. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020;12(4):442-9.
  24. Reis PJ, Faser K, Davis M. A Framework for Web-Based Interprofessional Education for Midwifery and Medical Students. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(6):713-7.
  25. Atalla Sh, Daradkeh M, Gawanmeh A, Khalil H, Mansoor W, Miniaoui S, et al. An intelligent recommendation system for automating academic advising based on curriculum analysis and performance modeling. Mathematics. 2023;11(5):1098.
  26. Vrontis D, Christofi M, Pereira V, Tarba S, Makrides A, Trichina E. Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: A systematic review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2022;33(6):1237–66.
  27. Ghaempanah F, Moasses Ghafari B, Hesami D, Hossein Zadeh R, Noroozpoor R, Moodi Ghalibaf AAl, et al. Metaverse and its impact on medical education and health care system: A narrative review. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(9):e70100.
  28. Piercy B, Miovsky N, Singh H, Afghani B, Schneider M. Enhancing the physician-scientist workforce: evaluating a mentored research program for medical students' research competencies and intentions. Res Sq. 2024;3:4830569.
  29. Li YS, Lam CSN, See C. Using a Machine Learning Architecture to Create an AI-Powered Chatbot for Anatomy Education. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(6):1729-30.
  30. Narayanan S, Ramakrishnan R, Durairaj E, Das A. Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing the Field of Medical Education. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e49604.
  31. Wu W, Berestova A, Lobuteva A, Stroiteleva N. An intelligent computer system for assessing student performance. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). 2021;16(2):31-45.
  32. Grivokostopoulou F, Perikos I, Hatzilygeroudis I. An educational system for learning search algorithms and automatically assessing student performance. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2017;27:207-40.
  33. Winkler-Schwartz A, Bissonnette V, Mirchi N, Ponnudurai N, Yilmaz R, Ledwos N, et al. Artificial intelligence in medical education: best practices using machine learning to assess surgical expertise in virtual reality simulation. Journal of surgical education. 2019;76(6):1681-90.
  34. Fazlollahi AM, Bakhaidar M, Alsayegh A, Yilmaz R, Winkler-Schwartz A, Mirchi N, et al. Effect of artificial intelligence tutoring vs expert instruction on learning simulated surgical skills among medical students: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA network open. 2022;5(2):e2149008.
  35. Talan T, Kalinkara Y. The role of artificial intelligence in higher education: ChatGPT assessment for anatomy course. Uluslararası Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri ve Bilgisayar Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023;7(1):33-40.
  36. Mirchi N, Bissonnette V, Yilmaz R, Ledwos N, Winkler-Schwartz A, Del Maestro RF. The Virtual Operative Assistant: An explainable artificial intelligence tool for simulation-based training in surgery and medicine. PloS one. 2020;15(2):e0229596.
  37. Aparicio F, Morales-Botello ML, Rubio M, Hernando A, Muñoz R, López-Fernández H, et al. Perceptions of the use of intelligent information access systems in university level active learning activities among teachers of biomedical subjects. Int J Med Inform. 2018;112:21-33.
  38. Rapanta C, Walton D. The use of argument maps as an assessment tool in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research. 2016;79:211-21.
  39. Wu L. Student model construction of intelligent teaching system based on Bayesian network. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 2020;24(3):419-28.
  40. Alshammari RFN, Arshad H; Abd Rahman AH; Albahri OS. Computer Techniques Engineering Department, Mazaya University College, Nasiriyah, Iraq Robotics utilization in automatic vision-based assessment systems from artificial intelligence perspective: A systematic review. IEEE Access. 2022;10:77537-70.
  41. Jedličková A. Ethical approaches in designing autonomous and intelligent systems: a comprehensive survey towards responsible development. AI & Society. 2024;40(4):2703-16.
  42. Leikas J, Koivisto R, Gotcheva N. Ethical Framework for Designing Autonomous Intelligent Systems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2019;5(1):18.
  43. Wangmo T, Lipps M, Kressig RW, Ienca M. Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders. BMC Medical Ethics. 2019;20(1):98.
  44. Jedlickova A. Ensuring Ethical Standards in the Development of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence. 2024;5(12):2691-4581.
 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 751
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 331


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب