LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات21
تعداد شماره‌ها1,304
تعداد مقالات11,935
تعداد مشاهده مقاله83,486,495
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله122,199,182
Hosseini, Seyed Hossein, Cheraghifard, Moslem, Azad, Akram, Taghizadeh, Ghorban, Lajevardi, Laleh. (1405). Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory-13. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(3), 153-161. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2025.104662.1531
Seyed Hossein Hosseini; Moslem Cheraghifard; Akram Azad; Ghorban Taghizadeh; Laleh Lajevardi. "Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory-13". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 3, 1405, 153-161. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2025.104662.1531
Hosseini, Seyed Hossein, Cheraghifard, Moslem, Azad, Akram, Taghizadeh, Ghorban, Lajevardi, Laleh. (1405). 'Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory-13', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(3), pp. 153-161. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2025.104662.1531
Hosseini, Seyed Hossein, Cheraghifard, Moslem, Azad, Akram, Taghizadeh, Ghorban, Lajevardi, Laleh. Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory-13. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1405; 13(3): 153-161. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2025.104662.1531

Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory-13

Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research
دوره 13، شماره 3، آذر 2026، صفحه 153-161    اصل مقاله (889.46 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jrsr.2025.104662.1531
نویسندگان
Seyed Hossein Hosseini؛ Moslem Cheraghifard؛ Akram Azad* ؛ Ghorban Taghizadeh؛ Laleh Lajevardi
Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
چکیده
Background: Stroke survivors often experience functional limitations, particularly impairments affecting the upper extremities. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI-13) in individuals with stroke.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 105 patients with stroke and 10 experts participated. The CAHAI-13 was translated into Persian following the IQOLA protocol. Participants completed the CAHAI-13 along with the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). The study evaluated content validity, construct validity, convergent and divergent validity, known-groups validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability.
Results: Expert evaluations indicated that the Persian version of the CAHAI-13 demonstrated satisfactory content validity. Significant positive correlations were observed between the CAHAI-13 and the ARAT (r = 0.84), WMFT (r = 0.91), and FMA-UE (r = 0.74) (P < 0.001), supporting its convergent validity. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a one-factor structure with an acceptable model fit in the stroke population. The instrument also demonstrated strong known-groups validity (F = 123.36, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the CAHAI-13 showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.96), good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.85), and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.93).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that the Persian version of the CAHAI-13 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing upper-extremity function in stroke survivors and can be used effectively in both clinical practice and research settings.

تازه های تحقیق
کلیدواژه‌ها
Measurement؛ Outcome Assessment؛ Stroke؛ Upper Extremity؛ Validation Study
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131(4):e29–322.
  2. Johnson CO, Nguyen M, Roth GA, Nichols E, Alam T, Abate D, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):439–458.
  3. Persson HC. Upper extremity functioning during the first year after stroke. University of Gothenburg. 2015.
  4. Mandehgary-Najafabadi M, Azad A, Mehdizadeh H, Behzadipour S, Fakhar M, Taghavi Azar-Sharabiani P, et al. Improvement of upper limb motor control and function after competitive and noncompetitive volleyball exercises in chronic stroke survivors: A randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(3):401–411.
  5. Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S. Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2005;36(7):480–484.
  6. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693–1702.
  7. Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EEH, Ket JCF, Heymans MW. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: A systematic review. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1482–1488.
  8. Küçükdeveci A, Tennant A, Grimby G, Franchignoni F. Strategies for assessment and outcome measurement in physical and rehabilitation medicine: An educational review. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(8):661-672.
  9. Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, Lamers I. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:1–15.
  10. Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Lang CE. An accelerometry-based methodology for assessment of real-world bilateral upper extremity activity. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103135.
  11. Barreca S, Gowland C, Stratford P, Huijbregts M, Griffiths J, Torresin W, et al. Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: Theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11(4):31–42.
  12. Barreca SR, Stratford PW, Lambert CL, Masters LM, Streiner DL. Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: A new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1616–1622.
  13. Choo SX, Bosch J, Richardson J, Stratford P, Harris JE. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Singapore version of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(21):2570–2577.
  14. Peres D, Romaguera F, Garcia JM, Rodrigues LC, Knabben RJ, Michaelsen SM. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI) 1. Cad Ter Ocup da UFSCar. 2017;25(3):1–11.
  15. Schuster C, Hahn S, Ettlin T. Objectively-assessed outcome measures: A translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure applied to the Chedoke McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:1–9.
  16. Zaucha H, Thomas A. Utility of Chedoke Arm Hand Activity Inventory in the Indian population: Mixed method research sequential explanatory. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019;7(6):2273.
  17. Arifin WN. A Web-based Sample Size Calculator for Reliability Studies. Educ Med J. 2018;10(3):67-76.
  18. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini‐mental state examination: A comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(9):922–935.
  19. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, Leplège A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):913–923.
  20. Azad A, Sabet A, Taghizadeh G, Mohammadi-Nezhad T. Clinical assessment of Persian translation of Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale in community-dwelling older adults. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(4):567-573.
  21. Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The intra-and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: A practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(1):14–19.
  22. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, Lin PH. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Action Research Arm Test in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1998;27(2):107–113.
  23. Karimi E, Kalantary M, Shafiee Z, Tabatabaiee M. Inter-rater reliability of the Action Research Arm Test and the upper-limb section of Fugl-Meyer Test in adults with CVA who were resident in Qazvin, Iran. J Res Rehabil Sci. 2014;10(1):67-76.
  24. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1635–1639.
  25. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook III EW, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(6):750–755.
  26. Deakin A, Hill H, Pomeroy VM. Rough guide to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Upper limb section. J Physiother. 2003;89(12):751–763.
  27. Singer B, Garcia-Vega J. The Fugl-Meyer upper extremity scale. J Physiother. 2017;63(1):53.
  28. Shrestha N. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. Am J Appl Math Stat. 2021;9(1):4–11.
  29. Arbuckle J. Amos 17.0 user’s guide. SPSS Inc.; 2008.
  30. Mulaik SA, James LR, Van Alstine J, Bennett N, Lind S, Stilwell CD. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol Bull. 1989;105(3):430.
  31. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238.
  32. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(3):272.
  33. Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Negahban H, Sohani SM, Taghizadeh F, Feizi A, et al. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18(6):755–759.
  34. Woytowicz EJ, Rietschel JC, Goodman RN, Conroy SS, Sorkin JD, Whitall J, et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(3):456–462.
  35. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
  36. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
  37. Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sport Med. 1998;26:217–238.
  38. DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications. Los Angeles, London, New Dehli, Singapore, Washingt DC, Melb. 2016.
  39. Sijtsma K. On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika. 2009;74:107–120.
  40. Berardi A, Tofani M, Valente D. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in the Italian population of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with stroke. Funct Neurol. 2018;33(4):229–253.
  41. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232–240.
  42. Behrendt F, Rizza JC, Blum F, Suica Z, Schuster-Amft C. German version of the Chedoke McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI-G): Intra-rater reliability and responsiveness. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18:1–9.
  43. Costa LOP, Maher CG, Latimer J, Hodges PW, Shirley D. An investigation of the reproducibility of ultrasound measures of abdominal muscle activation in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:1059–1065.
  44. Wyrwich KW, Nienaber NA, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care. 1999;37(5):469–478.
  45. Lin K chung, Fu T, Wu C yi, Wang Y ho, Liu J sen, Hsieh C ju, et al. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(5):486–492.
 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 58
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 92


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب