LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات21
تعداد شماره‌ها1,285
تعداد مقالات11,748
تعداد مشاهده مقاله82,847,053
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله121,720,165
Aali, Narges, Askarizadeh, Nahid, Abbasi Hamedani, Hoda, Tavassoli-Hojjati, Sara. (1405). In vitro Comparative Effects of Universal, Self-Etch, and Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives on Microshear Bond Strength of Primary Enamel. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), -. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2026.107500.2750
Narges Aali; Nahid Askarizadeh; Hoda Abbasi Hamedani; Sara Tavassoli-Hojjati. "In vitro Comparative Effects of Universal, Self-Etch, and Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives on Microshear Bond Strength of Primary Enamel". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, , , 1405, -. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2026.107500.2750
Aali, Narges, Askarizadeh, Nahid, Abbasi Hamedani, Hoda, Tavassoli-Hojjati, Sara. (1405). 'In vitro Comparative Effects of Universal, Self-Etch, and Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives on Microshear Bond Strength of Primary Enamel', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), pp. -. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2026.107500.2750
Aali, Narges, Askarizadeh, Nahid, Abbasi Hamedani, Hoda, Tavassoli-Hojjati, Sara. In vitro Comparative Effects of Universal, Self-Etch, and Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives on Microshear Bond Strength of Primary Enamel. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1405; (): -. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2026.107500.2750

In vitro Comparative Effects of Universal, Self-Etch, and Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives on Microshear Bond Strength of Primary Enamel

Journal of Dentistry
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 29 تیر 1405    اصل مقاله (462.45 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2026.107500.2750
نویسندگان
Narges Aali1؛ Nahid Askarizadeh2؛ Hoda Abbasi Hamedani3؛ Sara Tavassoli-Hojjati* 2
1Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, TeMS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, TeMS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3Student, Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, TeMS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده
ground: Selecting a suitable adhesive to achieve optimal micromechanical retention in the shortest possible time is a challenge in composite restoration of primary teeth.
Purpose: This study compared the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of universal, self-etch (SE), and etch-and-rinse (E&R) adhesives to primary enamel.
Materials and Method: In this in vitro experimental study, the buccal- and lingual-surface enamel of 56 extracted primary molars was wet-polished, and randomly divided into 4 groups (n=14) of (A) Clearfil SE Bond SE adhesive, (B) Scotchbond Multipurpose E&R adhesive, (C) G-Premio Bond universal adhesive with SE mode, and (D) G-Premio Bond Universal adhesive with E&R mode. Composite build-up was then performed, and the specimens underwent thermocycling. The µSBS was measured in a universal testing machine, and the mode of failure was determined stereomicroscopically. One specimen from each group underwent scanning electron microscopic (SEM) assessment. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test using SPSS (alpha= 0.05).
Results: The µSBS of Scotchbond Multipurpose was significantly higher than that of Clearfil SE Bond and G-Premio Bond (p Value <0.001). The µSBS of G-Premio Bond universal adhesive with E&R technique was significantly higher than that with SE technique (p= 0.001). However, the difference between Clearfil SE Bond and G-Premio Bond in E&R (p= 0.379) and SE (p= 0.064) modes was not significant.
Conclusion: It appears that Scotchbond Multipurpose three-step E&R adhesive still has the best performance in bonding to primary enamel. G-Premio universal adhesive can yield a µSBS comparable to that of Clearfil SE Bond two-step SE adhesive to enamel.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Dental Cements؛ Dental Enamel؛ Shear Strength؛ Tooth؛ Deciduous
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 6
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 4


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب