| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,287 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,774 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 82,958,470 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 121,798,158 |
Socioeconomic and Geographical Analysis on Antenatal Care Visits in Indonesia: A Cross-sectional Study | ||
| International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 14، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 55، مهر 2026، صفحه 219-232 اصل مقاله (779.92 K) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijcbnm.2026.106865.2797 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Tety Rachmawati* 1، 2؛ Stefanus Supriyanto3؛ Dede Anwar Musadad2؛ Hari Basuki Notobroto3؛ Yunita Fitriani2؛ Indah Pawitaningtyas2؛ Arief Priyo Nugroho2؛ Sri Handayani2؛ Zainul Khaqiqi Nantabah4؛ Diyan Ermawan Effendi2 | ||
| 1Doctoral Program of Faculty of Public Health, University of Airlangga, Indonesia; | ||
| 2Research Center for Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia, Cibinong Science Center, Indonesia; | ||
| 3Faculty of Public Health, University of Airlangga, Kampus C Unair, Indonesia; | ||
| 4Directorate of Laboratory Management, Research Facilities, and Science and Technology Park, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Antenatal care (ANC) is crucial for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality by detecting and managing pregnancy complications. In Indonesia, a policy mandating at least six ANC visits (K6) per pregnancy has been introduced, yet factors influencing adequate ANC under this new policy remain unevaluated. This study examines the national and sub-national prevalence of adequate ANC visits as well as its associated geographic and socioeconomic factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the 2023 Indonesian Health Survey, which included 70,916 women of reproductive age. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of ANC adequacy, such as age, education, marital status, health insurance, employment, urbanicity, economic status, and travel time to healthcare facilities. The data were analyzed through SPSS version 23 using descriptive statistics, chi square test, and multiple logistic regression. Final regression model was based on significant predictors only with calculated adjusted odd ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) with a significance level of 0.05. Results: The national prevalence of adequate ANC visits was 38.65%. However, a significant disparity was observed between provinces, with eastern areas showing much lower prevalence than provinces in western Indonesia. ANC adequacy was highest among women aged 25–29 and lowest among those under 20. Higher education (aOR=1.45, P<0.001), combined health insurance (aOR=2.84, P<0.001), employment (aOR=1.07, P<0.001), urban residence (aOR=1.24, P<0.001), and higher economic status (aOR=1.60, P<0.001) were positively associated with ANC adequacy. Conversely, being divorced (aOR=0.76, P<0.001) and widowed (aOR=0.74, P=0.004), and longer travel times to primary healthcare center negatively affected compliance (aOR=0.68, P<0.001). Conclusion: Addressing geographic and socioeconomic barriers through improved healthcare infrastructure, transportation support, and expanded insurance coverage is essential for increasing ANC utilization and improving maternal health in Indonesia. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
Tety Rachmawati (Google Scholar) (PubMed) | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Antenatal care؛ Healthcare disparities؛ Maternal health؛ Pregnancy | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Wojcieszek AM, Bonet M, Portela A, et al. WHO recommendations on maternal and newborn care for a positive postnatal experience: strengthening the maternal and newborn care continuum. BMJ Global Health. 2023;8:e010992. 2. McCauley H, Lowe K, Furtado N, et al. What are the essential components of antenatal care? A systematic review of the literature and development of signal functions to guide monitoring and evaluation. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2022;129:855-67. 3. Requejo JH, el Arifeen S. Why improving the measurement and monitoring of essential maternal and newborn health interventions matters. Journal of Global Health. 2020;10;10.020106. 4. Owusu PA, Sarkodie SA, Pedersen PA. Relationship between mortality and health care expenditure: Sustainable assessment of health care system. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0247413. 5. World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. 6. Adnani QES, Nurfitriyani E, Merida Y, et al. Ninety-one years of midwifery continuity of care in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review. BMC Health Services Research. 2025;25:463. 7. Bruno B, Mercer MB, Hizlan S, et al. Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23:234. 8. Ferrara A, Greenberg M, Zhu Y, et al. Prenatal Health Care Outcomes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Pregnant Individuals and Their Newborns in an Integrated US Health System. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6:e2324011. 9. Ministry of Health of Indonesia. Concerning the Provision of Health Services during the Pre-Pregnancy Period, Pregnancy Period, Childbirth, and Post-Childbirth Period, Contraceptive Services, and Sexual Health Services. Indonesia: Ministry of Health; 2021. [In Indonesian] 10. Lattof SR, Moran AC, Kidula N, et al. Implementation of the new WHO antenatal care model for a positive pregnancy experience: a monitoring framework. BMJ Global Health. 2020;5:e002605. 11. Shiferaw K, Mengiste B, Gobena T, et al. The Effect of Antenatal Care on Perinatal Outcomes in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16;e0245003. 12. Ng’ambi WF, Collins JH, Colbourn T, et al. Socio-demographic factors associated with early antenatal care visits among pregnant women in Malawi: 2004–2016. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0263650. 13. Senewe FP, Laksono AD, Massie RGA, et al. Institutional Delivery in the Philippines: Does a Minimum of 8 Antenatal Care Visits Matter? Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. 2025;58:44-51. 14. Titaley CR, Dibley MJ, Roberts CL. Factors associated with underutilization of antenatal care services in Indonesia: results of Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey 2002/2003 and 2007. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:485. 15. Rahmawati T, Hsieh HM. Appraisal of universal health insurance and maternal health services utilization: pre- and post-context of the Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional implementation in Indonesia. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024;12;1301421. 16. Effendi DE, Handayani L, Nugroho AP, et al. Adolescent pregnancy prevention in rural Indonesia: a participatory action research. Rural and Remote Health. 2021;21:6639. 17. Andriani H, Natasha V, Rachmadani SD, et al. Factors associated with the four-visit anc in indonesia: a population-based study. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management. 2022;17(1). 18. Wulandari RD, Laksono AD, Rohmah N. Urban-rural disparities of antenatal care in South East Asia: a case study in the Philippines and Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2021;21;1221. 19. Arroyave L, Saad GE, Victora CG, et al. Inequalities in antenatal care coverage and quality: an analysis from 63 low and middle-income countries using the ANCq content-qualified coverage indicator. Int J Equity Health. 2021;20:102. 20. Adewuyi EO, Auta A, Adewuyi MI, et al. Antenatal care utilisation and receipt of its components in Nigeria: Assessing disparities between rural and urban areas-A nationwide population-based study. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0307316. 21. Ministry of Health of Indonesia. Indonesia Health Survey 2023 in Numbers. Indonesia: Ministry of Health; 2023. [In Indonesian] 22. Ministry of Health of Indonesia. Primary results of SKI 2023. Indonesia: Ministry of Health; 2023. [In Indonesian] 23. Demissie DB, Molla G, Tiruneh Tiyare F, et al. Magnitude, disparity, and predictors of poor-quality antenatal care service: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Medicine. 2024;12;20503121241248275. 24. Girotra S, Malik M, Roy S, et al. Utilization and determinants of adequate quality antenatal care services in India: evidence from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) (2019-21). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23:800. 25. Khan N, Alam B, Chowdhury AR, et al. Availability and readiness of healthcare facilities and their effects on antenatal care services uptake in Bangladesh. BMC Health Services Research. 2024;24:431. 26. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. The 2020 Population Census. Indonesia: BPS-Statistics Indonesia; 2021. [Cited 20 April 2026]. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/en/pressrelease/2021/01/21/1854/hasil-sensus-penduduk--sp2020--pada-september-2020-mencatat-jumlah-penduduk-sebesar-270-20-juta-jiwa-.html [Last accessed: 10/17/2024] 27. Agustina R, Dartanto T, Sitompul R, et al. Universal health coverage in Indonesia: concept, progress, and challenges. The Lancet. 2019;393:75-102. 28. Heaman MI, Moffatt M, Elliott L, et al. Barriers, motivators and facilitators related to prenatal care utilization among inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada: a case–control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14:227. 29. Tibenderana JR, Kessy SA, Mlaponi DF, et al. The adequacy of ANC components received and associated factors among women of reproductive age in Tanzania. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0301570. 30. Young AM, Okpara N, Chelwa N, et al. Navigating antenatal care: The lived experiences of adolescent girls and young women and caregiver perspectives in Zambia. Women’s Health. 2024;20;17455057241281482. 31. McLarty L, Coleman S, Bryant M, et al. Factors Affecting Take Up of Community Based Antenatal Programmes in High Income Countries: a rapid realist review. Midwifery. 2025;149:104502. 32. Raru TB, Ayana GM, Zakaria HF, et al. Association of Higher Educational Attainment on Antenatal Care Utilization Among Pregnant Women in East Africa Using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 2010 to 2018: A Multilevel Analysis. Int J Womens Health. 2022;14:67-77. 33. Yoseph A, Teklesilasie W, Guillen-Grima F, et al. Effect of community health education on mothers’ knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness and complication readiness practices in southern Ethiopia: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0312267. 34. Shine S, Derseh B, Alemayehu B, et al. Magnitude and associated factors of husband involvement on antenatal care follow up in Debre Berhan town, Ethiopia 2016: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020;20:567. 35. Kazibwe J, Tran PB, Kaiser AH, et al. The impact of health insurance on maternal and reproductive health service utilization and financial protection in low- and lower middle-income countries: a systematic review of the evidence. BMC Health Services Research. 2024;24:432. 36. Fauzi R, Kyi YP, Mon MM, et al. Factors affecting optimal antenatal care utilization in Indonesia: implications for policies and practices. Journal of Public Health Policy. 2021;42:559-73. 37. Okedo-Alex IN, Akamike IC, Ezeanosike OB, et al. Determinants of antenatal care utilisation in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e031890. 38. Chen X, Orom H, Hay JL, et al. Differences in rural and urban health information access and use. The Journal of Rural Health. 2018;35:405-17. 39. Mseke EP, Jessup B, Barnett T. Impact of distance and/or travel time on healthcare service access in rural and remote areas: A scoping review. Journal of Transport and Health. 2024;37:101819. 40. Amungulu ME, Nghitanwa EM, Mbapaha C. An investigation of factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care services among women in post-natal wards in two Namibian hospitals in the Khomas region. Journal of Public Health in Africa. 2023;14:2154. 41. Alamgir F, Hossain MF, Ullah MS, et al. Socio-economic status and pregnancy complications and their impact on antenatal care services provided at home and Upazila health complex. Heliyon. 2024;10:e27716. 42. Liebregts J, Goodarzi B, Valentijn P, et al. Organising maternal and newborn care in high-income countries: a scoping review of organisational elements and their association with outcomes. BMJ Open. 2025;15:e107624. 43. Stevenson K, Edwards S, Ogunlana K, et al. Public health, policy, and clinical interventions to improve perinatal care for migrant women and infants in high-income countries: a systematic review. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;78:102938. 44. Luke S, Hobbs A, Mak S, et al. Travel Time to Delivery, Antenatal Care, and Birth Outcomes: A Population-Based Cohort of Uncomplicated Pregnancies in British Columbia, 2012-2019. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2022;44:886-94. 45. Idris H, Karimah RN, Yulianti A. Urban–rural differences in the incompleteness of antenatal care coverage in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study. Malaysian Family Physician. 2025;20:18. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 155 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 189 |
||