| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,285 |
| تعداد مقالات | 11,757 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 82,898,552 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 121,769,644 |
Iranian Older Adults’ Experiences of the Age-friendliness of Kashan City: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study | ||
| International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 14، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 55، مهر 2026، صفحه 233-244 اصل مقاله (483.85 K) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijcbnm.2026.107383.2825 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Fatemeh Sadat Izadi- Avanji؛ Azade Safa* ؛ Mohsen Adib-Hajbaghery؛ Fatemeh Fallahi | ||
| Trauma Nursing Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The global aging population has intensified the urgency to design age-friendly cities that ensure equitable access to services and foster active participation among older adults. Despite extensive research on age-friendly initiatives, there remains a notable gap in studies exploring older adults’ experiences of such environments. This study aimed to explore older adults’ experiences of age-friendliness of Kashan City. Methods: This qualitative conventional content analysis was conducted from January to August 2024 in Kashan, Iran. Twenty in-depth semi-structured interviews with 18 older adults living in Kashan were performed using a purposive sampling method. Data collection was continued up to data saturation. Data collection and analysis were performed simultaneously, using MAXQDA version 2020. Interviews were analyzed using Graneheim and Lundman’s method, with trustworthiness ensured by Lincoln and Guba’s criteria. Results: The central theme “a city with forgotten older people” emerged, along with 18 subcategories and 5 main categories: inadequate open and closed public spaces, transportation and safety concerns, challenges in social participation, and difficulties with technology. Conclusions: Kashan faces challenges in becoming an age-friendly city, as older adults are often excluded from urban planning. A community-based approach emphasizing participation, social ties, and local capacity can improve their quality of life. Beyond infrastructure, policy reforms, caregiver training, and support networks are needed. It is suggested that further studies should explore vulnerable seniors’ experiences and Iran’s diverse regional and cultural contexts. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
Fatemeh Sadat Izadi- Avanji (Google Scholar) (PubMed) Azade Safa (PubMed) | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Aged؛ City Planning؛ Qualitative Research؛ Urban Health | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Fallahi F, Adib-Hajbaghery M, Safa A. Status of age-friendly city indicators in Iran cities: a systematic review. BMC Geriatrics. 2024;24:412. 2. Rezaei-Shahsavarloo Z, Atashzadeh-Shoorideh F, Ebadi A, et al. Factors affecting missed nursing care in hospitalized frail older adults in the medical wards: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics. 2021;21:555. 3. Maresova P, Krejcar O, Maskuriy R, Bakar N, et al. Challenges and opportunity in mobility among older adults–key determinant identification. BMC Geriatrics. 2023;23:447. 4. Van Hoof J, Marston H, Kazak J, et al. Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment. Building and Environment. 2021;199:107922. 5. United Nations. World Population Ageing 2020 Highlights. US: United Nations; 2020. 6. Iran Statistics Center. General Results of the General Population and Housing Census. Tehran: Iran Statistics Center; 2016. [Cited 2 Feb 2026]. Available from: https://amar.org.ir/population-and-housing-census 7. World Health Organization. The global network for age-friendly cities and communities: Looking back over the last decade, looking forward to the next. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. 8. Kim J. The Age-Friendly Community Policy Movement and the Residential Location of US Older Adults: The Case of Hamilton County, Ohio. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 2022;41:1722-32. 9. Ivan L, Beu D, Van Hoof J. Smart and age-friendly cities in Romania: An overview of public policy and practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17:5202. 10. Ghaffari G, Mohammadi C, Davari E. Evaluating elderly-friendly city indicators (a case study of Sari). Environ Based Territorial Plann. 2022;15:1-25. [In Persian] 11. Morowatisharifabad M, Tagharrobi L, Jambarsang S, et al. Age-friendly city indicators from the viewpoint of older adults in Kashan City, Iran. Journal of Aging Environment. 2022;36:156-72. 12. Samei S, Safaeeian A, Azizi Zeinalhajlou A, et al. Viewpoints of older people toward the features of age-friendly communities: map for charting progress in Tabriz, Iran. Journal of Aging and Environment. 2022;36:73-89. 13. Zarghani S, Kharazmi O, Johari L. Evaluation of the “Age-Friendly” city indicators in Mashhad by focusing on the social-cultural indices. Human Geography Research. 2016;47:673-88.[In Persian] 14. Lindgren B, Lundman B, Graneheim U. Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2020;108:103632. 15. Kalantar M, Tirgar A, Pourhadi S. Identifying structural suitability components of aged-friendly mosques in Iran: a qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2021;16:362-75. [In Persian] 16. Raji Z, Ali Asl R. Exploring and analyzing the Thematic network of senior tourism obstacles. Tourism And Leisure Time. 2023;8:113-29. [In Persian] 17. Tajvar M, Grundy E, Fletcher A, et al. Role of family factors in provision and perception of social support for older people in Iran: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Primary Care. 2023;24:279. 18. Safa A, Adib-Hajbaghery M, Zahiri M. A survey of the age-friendly indicators of Kashan City, Iran (2022). International Archives of Health Science. 2024;11:62-8. 19. Gheyle N, Jacobs T. Content Analysis: a short overview. Internal research note. 2017. 20. Bakhtiyari F, Foroughan M, Fakhrzadeh H, et al. Validation of the persian version of Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) in elderly residents of Kahrizak charity foundation. Iranian Journal of Diabetes Metabolism. 2014;13:487-94. [In Persian] 21. Malakouti K, Fathollahi P, Mirabzadeh A, et al. Validation of geriatric depression scale (GDS-15) in Iran. Research in Medicine. 2006;30:361-9. [In Persian] 22. Forero R, Nahidi S, De Costa J, et al. Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine. BMC Health Services Research. 2018;18:120. 23. Mohtasham-Amiri Z, Barge-Gol I, Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati L, et al. Factors influencing the use of pedestrian bridges in north of Iran. Bulletin of Emergency Trauma. 2022;10:27-32. 24. Prescott M, Miller W, Routhier F, et al. Factors affecting the activity spaces of people who use mobility devices to get around the community. Health Place. 2020;64:102375. 25. Lak A, Khodakarim S, Myint P, et al. The influencing factors of elder-friendly public open spaces promoting older adults’ health in deprived urban neighborhoods: Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling approach. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11:1143289. 26. Guerry E, Zissis G, Caumon C, et al, editors. Light and color: a factor of safety in the everyday life of the elderly. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe). Palermo, Italy: IEEE; 2018. 27. Khosh Bayani Arani F, Babaiefard A. Factors Affecting the Social Exclusion of the Elderly in Kashan and Aran and Bidgol. Social Welfare. 2022;22:299-334. [In Persian] 28. Ravensbergen L, Van Liefferinge M, Isabella J, et al. Accessibility by public transport for older adults: a systematic review. Journal of Transport Geography. 2022;103:103408. 29. Cirella G, Bąk M, Kozlak A, et al. Transport innovations for elderly people. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 2019;30:100381. 30. Twardzik E, Falvey J, Clarke P, et al. Public transit stop density is associated with walking for exercise among a national sample of older adults. BMC Geriatrics. 2023;23:596. 31. Leung A, Molassiotis A, Carino D. A challenge to healthy aging: Limited social participation in old age. Aging and Disease. 2021;12:1536-8. 32. Jalali M, Sarikhani Y, Askarian F, et al. Factors facilitating and inhibiting the social participation of the elderly in health-oriented activities in Shiraz, Southern Iran. BMC Geriatrics. 2023;23:175. 33. Heydari A, Sharifi M, Moghaddam A. Challenges and barriers to providing care to older adult patients in the intensive care unit: a qualitative research. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences. 2019;7:3682-90. 34. Gripko M, Joseph A. The Role of the Built Environment in Supporting Older Adults’ Engagement: A Narrative Literature Review. Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2024;17:329-53. 35. Dickerson A, Molnar L, Bédard M, et al. Transportation and aging: An updated research agenda to advance safe mobility among older adults transitioning from driving to non-driving. The Gerontologist. 2019;59:215-21. 36. Whitley E, Craig P, Popham F. Impact of the statutory concessionary travel scheme on bus travel among older people: a natural experiment from England. Ageing Society. 2020;40:2480-94. 37. Farokhzadian J, Khajehpour M, Motamedi F, et al. Health-related needs and indicators of an age-friendly city: a survey from the perspective of older adults in a province in Southeastern Iran. BMC Geriatrics. 2025;25:480. 38. Emmesjö L, Hallgren J, Gillsjö C. Older adults’ digital technology experiences: a qualitative study. BMC Digital Health. 2025;3:24. 39. Peng Y, Cheng Z, Fu P, et al. A Study on the Elderly-Orientation of Urban Public Space. Open Access Library Journal. 2022;9:1-11. 40. Ivan L, Cutler S. Ageism and technology: the role of internalized stereotypes. University of Toronto Quarterly. 2021;90:127-39. 41. Kolotouchkina O, Viñarás-Abad M, Mañas-Viniegra L. Digital ageism: Emerging challenges and best practices of age-friendly digital urban governance. Media and Communication. 2023;11:6-17. 42. Sohrabzadeh M, Niazi M, Afra H. Sociological explanation of the relationship between individualism and change in family structure. Policing And Social Studies of Women And Family. 2020;8:171-98. [In Persian] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 89 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 144 |
||