LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,269
تعداد مقالات11,565
تعداد مشاهده مقاله82,040,824
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله121,156,654
Aggarwal, Arpit, Aleissa, Maryam, Joshi, Saakshi, Drelichman, Ernesto, Mittal, Vijay, Bhullar, Jasneet. (1404). Patient Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery: A Systematic Review. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(4), -. doi: 10.30476/acrr.2026.108704.1265
Arpit Aggarwal; Maryam Aleissa; Saakshi Joshi; Ernesto Drelichman; Vijay Mittal; Jasneet Bhullar. "Patient Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery: A Systematic Review". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 4, 1404, -. doi: 10.30476/acrr.2026.108704.1265
Aggarwal, Arpit, Aleissa, Maryam, Joshi, Saakshi, Drelichman, Ernesto, Mittal, Vijay, Bhullar, Jasneet. (1404). 'Patient Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery: A Systematic Review', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(4), pp. -. doi: 10.30476/acrr.2026.108704.1265
Aggarwal, Arpit, Aleissa, Maryam, Joshi, Saakshi, Drelichman, Ernesto, Mittal, Vijay, Bhullar, Jasneet. Patient Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery: A Systematic Review. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 13(4): -. doi: 10.30476/acrr.2026.108704.1265

Patient Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery: A Systematic Review

Iranian Journal of Colorectal Research
دوره 13، شماره 4، اسفند 2025    اصل مقاله (1001 K)
نوع مقاله: Review Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/acrr.2026.108704.1265
نویسندگان
Arpit Aggarwal1؛ Maryam Aleissa* 2؛ Saakshi Joshi3؛ Ernesto Drelichman1؛ Vijay Mittal1؛ Jasneet Bhullar1
1Department of Surgery - Henry Ford Hospital- Michigan State University Collage of Humen Medicine. Southfield - MI USA
2Department of Surgery - Henry Ford Hospital - Michigan state university, collage of human medicine - Southfield - MI Collage of Medicine - Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman university - Riyadh -KSA
3Department of Internal Medicine, McLaren- Macomb, Macomb, MI
چکیده
Advances in digital and mechanical technologies have profoundly transformed modern surgery. Since its
approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 2000, the widespread integration of robotic-assisted surgery
(RAS) has created a complex ethical and political dynamic involving patients, healthcare professionals,
manufacturers, and legislators. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify potential patient- and industryrelated drawbacks of RAS early on and to promote public awareness of the technology. Published data on
patient perceptions of RAS from 2000 to 2024 were analyzed using the PubMed gateway and Cochrane Library
databases. Studies focusing on clinical outcomes or the perceptions of surgeons and healthcare workers were
excluded. Extracted data included sample size, methodology, information sources, prevalent perceptions, and
willingness to undergo RAS. A total of 12 studies involving 35,769 participants met our inclusion and exclusion
criteria. Acceptance of RAS was higher among individuals with higher education levels and in countries where
RAS is commonly practiced; however, concerns about manufacturing defects and the surgeon’s experience
with RAS persisted. Most participants understood that RAS offers greater precision, less pain, and enables
faster recovery. However, many believed that the robot operated autonomously. Previous experience with and
perceived ease of use of the robotic surgery platform were inversely associated with patients’ information
levels, suggesting that increased exposure may lead to a more realistic but not necessarily deeper understanding
of robotic surgery. All included studies were questionnaire-based and varied in design, which may limit the
generalizability of the findings. We conclude that the healthcare industry faces new challenges as innovation
influences the sacred patient-physician relationship. Ethical and legal considerations, including informed
consent, machine malfunction, cost-effectiveness, and troubleshooting support, affect patients’ perceptions.
Additionally, the media plays a significant role in shaping public understanding of RAS.
Registration: PROSPERO ID CRD42025630165.

تازه های تحقیق

Arpit Aggarwal (Google Scholar)

Maryam Aleissa (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Key Words: Robotic Surgical Procedures؛ Perception؛ Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
مراجع
1. George EI, Brand CTC, Marescaux
J. Origins of robotic surgery: from
skepticism to standard of care. Jsls
.2018;22(4):e2018. 00039.
2. Satava RMJTScoNA. Robotic
surgery: from past to future--a
personal journey. Surg Clin North
Am.2003;83(6):1491-500, xii.
3. Benabid A, Cinquin P, Lavalle S,
et al. Computer-driven robot for
stereotactic surgery connected to
CT scan and magnetic resonance
imaging: technological design
and preliminary results. Appl
Neurophysiol. 1987;50(1-6):153-4.
4. Surgical Robotics and Navigation
Market Analysis, Size, Share &
COVID-19 Impact Analysis |
Global | 2022-2028 | MedSuite |
Includes: ENT Surgical Navigation
Market, Minimally Invasive Surgery
Robotics Systems Market, and 8 more.
09/22/2022. Accessed 12/25/2023
https://idataresearch.com/product/
surgical-robotics-and-navigationmarket/. 2025
5. Wilson M, Badani KJTUCoNA.
Competing Robotic Systems: A
Preview. Urologic Clinics of North
America. 2020;48(1):147-50.
6. Torrent-Sellens J, Jiménez-Zarco
AI, Saigí-Rubió F. Do People Trust
in Robot-Assisted Surgery? Evidence
from Europe. Int J Environ Res Public
Health. 2021;18(23):12519.
7. Martinello N, Loshak H. Experiences
with and expectations of robotic
surgical systems: a rapid qualitative
review. Canadian Agency for Drugs
and Technologies in Health.2020.
8. Arshad S, Brar G, Xu S, et al. 222
Robotic Surgery: Public Perceptions
and Current Misconceptions.
British Journal of Surgery.
2022;109(Supplement_1):znac040. 20.
9. Saniotis A, Henneberg MJEiS,
Politics E. Neurosurgical robots and
ethical challenges to medicine. Ethics
Sci Environ Politics. 2021;21:25-30.
10. Kim WT, Ham WS, Jeong W, et al.
Failure and malfunction of da Vinci
Surgical systems during various
robotic surgeries: experience from
six departments at a single institute.
Urology. 2009;74(6):1234-7.
11. Ferrarese A, Pozzi G, Borghi F, et
al. Malfunctions of robotic system
in surgery: role and responsibility of
surgeon in legal point of view. Open
Med (Wars). 2016;11(1):286-91.
12. Giffen Z, Ezzone A, Ekwenna OJPO.
Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?–FDA
database analysis across multiple
surgical specialties. PLoS One.
2021;16(6):e0253548.
13. Ahmad A, Ahmad ZF, Carleton
JD, et al. Robotic surgery: current
perceptions and the clinical evidence.
Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):255-63.
14. Chu CM, Agrawal A, Mazloomdoost
D, et al. Patients’ knowledge
of and attitude toward robotic
surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg.
2019;25(4):279-83.
15. McDermott H, Choudhury N,
Lewin-Runacres M, et al. Gender
differences in understanding and
acceptance of robot-assisted surgery.
J Robot Surg.2020;14(1):227-32.
16. Buabbas AJ, Aldousari S, Shehab
AAJBmi, et al. An exploratory study
of public’awareness about roboticsassisted surgery in Kuwait. BMC Med
Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20(1):140.
17. Aldousari SA, Buabbas AJ, Yaiesh
SM, et al. Multiple perceptions of
robotic-assisted surgery among
surgeons and patients: a crosssectional study. J Robot Surg.
2021;15(4):529-38.
18. Anania EC, Rice S, Winter SRJJoRS.
Building a predictive model of US
patient willingness to undergo
robotic surgery. J Robot Surg.
2021;15(2):203-14.
19. Muaddi H, Zhao X, Leonardelli GJ,
et al. Fear of innovation: public’s
perception of robotic surgery. Surg
Endosc. 2022;36(8):6076-83.
20. Algethami RF, Alotbi MF,
Alsulaimani AI, et al. Assessment of
knowledge and awareness regarding
robotics-assisted surgery (RAS)
among Saudi population: a cross
sectional study. Medical Science.
2023;27(132):1-9.
21. Irfan Thalib H, Tahir K, Shrouq
Amin A, et al. Public awareness
and perception of robotic-assisted
surgery: a cross-sectional analysis
of sociodemographic influences.
Frontiers in public health.
2025;13:1662689.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب