LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,264
تعداد مقالات11,524
تعداد مشاهده مقاله81,923,583
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله121,050,172
REHMAN, REHANA, NASIR, YUSRA, ALI, SOBIA, BAIG, MUKHTIAR, KHALID, SAIRA, ALI, TAZEEN S., ALI, RAHILA. (1405). Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, and Challenges: SWOC Analysis of Faculty Mentorship Program at a Private Medical College. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(2), 158-170. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2025.108836.2275
REHANA REHMAN; YUSRA NASIR; SOBIA ALI; MUKHTIAR BAIG; SAIRA KHALID; TAZEEN S. ALI; RAHILA ALI. "Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, and Challenges: SWOC Analysis of Faculty Mentorship Program at a Private Medical College". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 2, 1405, 158-170. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2025.108836.2275
REHMAN, REHANA, NASIR, YUSRA, ALI, SOBIA, BAIG, MUKHTIAR, KHALID, SAIRA, ALI, TAZEEN S., ALI, RAHILA. (1405). 'Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, and Challenges: SWOC Analysis of Faculty Mentorship Program at a Private Medical College', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(2), pp. 158-170. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2025.108836.2275
REHMAN, REHANA, NASIR, YUSRA, ALI, SOBIA, BAIG, MUKHTIAR, KHALID, SAIRA, ALI, TAZEEN S., ALI, RAHILA. Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, and Challenges: SWOC Analysis of Faculty Mentorship Program at a Private Medical College. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1405; 14(2): 158-170. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2025.108836.2275

Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, and Challenges: SWOC Analysis of Faculty Mentorship Program at a Private Medical College

Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
دوره 14، شماره 2، تیر 2026، صفحه 158-170    اصل مقاله (818.65 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jamp.2025.108836.2275
نویسندگان
REHANA REHMAN1؛ YUSRA NASIR2؛ SOBIA ALI2؛ MUKHTIAR BAIG3؛ SAIRA KHALID4؛ TAZEEN S. ALI5؛ RAHILA ALI* 6
1Department of Biological & Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
2Department of Health Professions Education, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
3Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
4Nursing Instructor, College of Nursing Armed Forces Postgraduate, Medical Institute (AFPGMI), Rawalpindi, Pakistan
5School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
6Department for Educational Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
چکیده
Introduction: This study aimed to conduct a SWOC (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Challenges) analysis of the faculty mentorship program at Aga Khan University Medical College (AKU-MC) Karachi, Pakistan, to assess and enhance its effectiveness.
Methods: A qualitative exploratory study was conducted, purposive sampling was used to enroll participants, and their consent was obtained before conducting interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs). Program manager and senior leader involved in the program for minimum of one year were also included.
Results: Seventeen individuals from AKU-MC participated; informal mentorship, transition to formal mentorship, and voluntary research mentorship, as well as a supportive ecosystem, mentor-mentee matching, training for skills development, and the role model were identified as the strengths of the program. Weaknesses included infrequent mentor-mentee interactions and resource limitations. Opportunities included the development of connections and future development. Challenges identified included low-frequency meetings and inadequate time for mentor-mentee meetings.
Conclusion: The faculty mentorship program at AKU-MC significantly contributed to the professional development of the faculty. However, to enhance mentor-mentee dynamics, the study identified a clear need for more frequent meetings and better overall mentor-mentee interactions, likely by addressing the identified resource and scheduling limitations. The study recommends establishing a structured framework to strengthen faculty mentorship practices. This includes formal mentor training programs focused on communication, feedback, and ethical practice; institutional policies that define the roles and integrate mentorship outcomes into faculty evaluation; and the adoption of flexible formats, such as virtual or group mentoring, to enhance accessibility. Regular monitoring and feedback mechanisms should be implemented to ensure sustainability and continuous improvement of the mentoring culture.

تازه های تحقیق
کلیدواژه‌ها
Mentoring؛ Evaluation؛ Communication؛ Strength؛ Weakness؛ Opportunities؛ Challenges
مراجع
  1. Zehra T, Tariq M, Rehman R, Zuberi RW. Basics of faculty-to-faculty mentoring: A process to identify support and challenges. Plos one. 2023;18(6):e0287127.
  2. Minshew LM, Zeeman JM, Olsen AA, Bush AA, Patterson JH, McLaughlin JE. Qualitative evaluation of a junior faculty team mentoring program. American journal of pharmaceutical education. 2021;85(4):8281.
  3. Sabeghi H, Vagharseyyedin SA, Mood MS. Collaborative Mentoring: Perceptions of a sample of Iranian Nursing and Midwifery faculties. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2020;8(4):189.
  4. Guhan N, Prakash Krishnan M, Dharshini P, Abraham P, Thomas S. The effect of mentorship program in enhancing the academic performance of first MBBS students. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2020;8(4):196.
  5. Crites GE, Ward WL, Archuleta P, Fornari A, Hill SE, Westervelt LM, et al. A scoping review of health care faculty mentorship programs in academia: implications for program design, implementation, and outcome evaluation. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2023;43(1):42-51.
  6. Straus SE, Johnson MO, Marquez C, Feldman MD. Characteristics of successful and failed mentoring relationships: a qualitative study across two academic health centers. Acad Med. 2013;88(1):82-9.
  7. Fleming M, House S, Hanson VS, Yu L, Garbutt J, McGee R, et al. The mentoring competency assessment: validation of a new instrument to evaluate skills of research mentors. Acad Med. 2013;88(7):1002-8.
  8. Denard Thomas J, Gail Lunsford L, Rodrigues HA. Early career academic staff support: Evaluating mentoring networks. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2015;37(3):320-9.
  9. Jackevicius CA, Le J, Nazer L, Hess K, Wang J, Law AV. A formal mentorship program for faculty development. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2014;78(5):100.
  10. Krishna LKR, Hamid NABA, Phua GLG, Mason S, Hill R, Lim C, et al. Peer mentorship and professional identity formation: an ecological systems perspective. BMC Medical Education. 2024;24(1):1007.
  11. Murray DD, Williams CR, Gaddy JA, Rogers CD, Kirabo A, Santisteban MM, et al. The power of junior faculty mentoring committees. Journal of cellular physiology. 2024;239(7):e31360.
  12. Dickson KS, Glass JE, Barnett ML, Graham AK, Powell BJ, Stadnick NA. Value of peer mentoring for early career professional, research, and personal development: a case study of implementation scientists. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. 2021;5(1):e112.
  13. Martin JB, Douglas DH. Faculty mentorship: Making it work across the career continuum through development, implementation, and evaluation of a formal mentorship program. Nursing education perspectives. 2018;39(5):317-8.
  14. Rehman R, Khan F, Kayani N, Ali TS. Reflection of mentors and mentees at initiation of Faculty Mentorship Program at Aga Khan University: A perspective. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2022;38(6):1691.
  15. Rehman R, Ali R, Khalid S, Ali TS. Seeds of trust ripe as luscious fruits: Faculty mentorship forum at Aga Khan University Medical College. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023;39(5):1268.
  16. Rehman R, Arooj M, Ali R, Ali TS, Javed K, Chaudhry S. Building stronger foundations: exploring a collaborative faculty mentoring workshop for in-depth growth. BMC Medical Education. 2024;24(1):797.
  17. Bandura A, Walters RH. Social learning theory. USA: Prentice hall Englewood Cliffs; 1977.
  18. Vygotsky LS. The development of higher psychological functions. Soviet Psychology. 1977;15(3):60-73.
  19. Bass BM. From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics. 1990;18(3):19-31.
  20. Krishna L, Toh YP, Mason S, Kanesvaran R. Mentoring stages: A study of undergraduate mentoring in palliative medicine in Singapore. PloS one. 2019;14(4):e0214643.
  21. Johnson JL, Adkins D, Chauvin S. A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American journal of pharmaceutical education. 2020;84(1):7120.
  22. Thomas DR. Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? Qualitative research in psychology. 2017;14(1):23-41.
  23. Bingham AJ. From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International journal of qualitative methods. 2023;22:16094069231183620.
  24. Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice. 2018;24(1):120-4.
  25. Fife ST, Gossner JD. Deductive qualitative analysis: Evaluating, expanding, and refining theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2024;23:16094069241244856.
  26. Sarabipour S, Niemi NM, Burgess SJ, Smith CT, Bisson Filho AW, Ibrahim A, et al. The faculty-to-faculty mentorship experience: a survey on challenges and recommendations for improvements. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 2023;290(2013):20230983.
  27. Kairat G. Informal faculty mentoring practices in higher education in Kazakhstan. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region. 2019;4(2):85-95.
  28. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marušić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1103-15.
  29. Waddell J, Martin J, Schwind JK, Lapum JL. A faculty-based mentorship circle: Positioning New Faculty for Success. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 2016;46(4):60-75.
  30. Ho H, Garcia B, Hernandez GT, Shokar GS. How to Effectively Mentor Junior Faculty? Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;8(1):92-6.
  31. Uslu B. Mentoring and role modelling through the perspective of academic intellectual leadership: Voluntarily and institutionally. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership. 2020;5(3):921-52.
  32. Horsburgh J. Becoming a medical educator: understanding a complex professional identity. UK: King's College London; 2018.
  33. Ahn J, Hu S, Vega A. Mentoring in the workplace and employee outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2020;35(5):625-48.
  34. Zimmerman BJ. Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. 2013;1:1-36.
  35. Barrett N, Murphy A, Zechner M, Malenczak D. Faculty mentorship in allied health schools: A program evaluation of a mentorship initiative. Journal of Allied Health. 2019;48(2):134-9.
  36. Major TE, Koyabe B, Narasimhamurthy M, Nkomazana O, Friedman HM. Research Mentoring Plan Involving North-South Collaborations. Journal of Global Oncology. 2019;5:1900176.
  37. Kramer D. A Guide for Developing a Culture of Caring Through Nursing Peer Mentorship Programs: Fostering Success and Resilience. USA: Springer Nature; 2024.
  38. Zainol J, Salam A. An audit on Mentor-Mentee Program: mentees perceptions on mentors. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. 2021;20(4):840-7.
  39. Ssemata AS, Gladding S, John CC, Kiguli S. Developing mentorship in a resource-limited context: a qualitative research study of the experiences and perceptions of the makerere university student and faculty mentorship programme. BMC medical education. 2017;17(1):123.
  40. Darani S, Esplen MJ, Ho C, Lanctot K, Teshima J, Kwong D, et al. Innovations in mentorship: Implementation of a mentorship program in psychiatry that encourages reflection on intersectionality and wellness. BJPsych Open. 2022;8(S1):S20-S.
  41. Abdollahi M, Nabavi FH. Mentoring as an appropriate strategy for medical faculty member development in higher education: a systematic review. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2023;11(1):3.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 26
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 32


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب